GPS - Cell Tower - Microwave - 5G

Sure but what can be proven to be harmful?
Studies in humans are manipulated all the time. Do you also believe vaccine damage is fake as the rigged studies claim? There are studies extolling the benefits of milk, eggs etc yet not many here would buy that. Look I see your point on proof but who would spend them money to study potential harm.from 5G? Look how many.other things with.big money behind them suspected to harmful, were kept hidden from people for decades. E.g cigarettes, fluoride, asbestos, BPA, thalidomide etc. The elites are all for 5G, another alarm bell. I've personally known people that get severe migraines when in close proximity to cell towers. What about cellphones lowering.sperm count or increasing incidence of brain tumours? Made up too? I think not.

Forgotmylogin wrote:What about cellphones lowering.sperm count or increasing incidence of brain tumours? Made up too? I think not

There you go again, show a study that shows this.

vincey84 wrote:The 5g look like fools with or without the burning of towers that is my point.

I agree that 5G is foolish as it is - and it ridicules the actual conspiracies and truths in this world. But now with the pretend burning of towers they can make 5G believers 'a danger for society' because they destroy vital communication systems or something like that. The majority actual believe people attack these towers with a can of gasoline, which is insane when you think about it, including those who believe it is harmful.

Next thing you know you will be labeled a conspiracy-terrorist if you go against anything they push in the media - including subjects like flat earth - because the controlled opposition combines these subjects as truths. In the end it just seems another psychological tactic to silence critical thinkers.

"So you think the world is flat? Then you also must believe that 5G is harmful, which makes you a terrorist"

Forgotmylogin wrote: I've personally known people that get severe migraines when in close proximity to cell towers.

I personally know people as well that get migraines when they are close to towers, but only when they KNOW there are towers nearby. When people beLIEve they are surrounded by invisible harmful radiation, they actually can think themself sick and a migraine is just a symptom of that. Our emotions and what we put in our bodies are the things we should pay attention to, not this BS.

https://humansarefree.com/2020/02/dutch-state-secretary-admits-5g-will-be-used-for-crowd-control.html

Yeah Just Vital, the starting a fire with gasoline at some metal tower does sound absurd, it is just that i haven't really looked much into the staging of events. Apparently there are a lot of things that could be staged when you look back right? I do think feelings and emotions are way underestimated when it comes to steering our bodies even of getting diseases.

Videos of these 5g tower fires have been censored, typical. It is just weird like this tower burning like its made of gunpowder.

Anyways to all, I am not saying when i ask for evidence or reports or research that I am necessarily against the theory. But that is what it is, a theory. It is good sometimes to throw up some theories, but it is also good to come back from that because it can be restricting your view quite a lot. So not start making theory upon theory without ever going back to the basis.

Zzzap wrote:https://humansarefree.com/2020/02/dutch-state-secretary-admits-5g-will-be-used-for-crowd-control.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzG4oEutPbA&ab_channel=USFORCESTV

here a youtube from 2012.

vincey84 wrote:

Forgotmylogin wrote:What about cellphones lowering.sperm count or increasing incidence of brain tumours? Made up too? I think not

https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/ijo.2015.2908
There you go again, show a study that shows this.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3341445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK208983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6240172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278351/

Forgotmylogin wrote:

vincey84 wrote:

Forgotmylogin wrote:What about cellphones lowering.sperm count or increasing incidence of brain tumours? Made up too? I think not

https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/ijo.2015.2908
There you go again, show a study that shows this.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3341445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK208983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6240172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278351/

You know, i have read through these. Many of these articles say that more research is needed, then it is about certain exposures. And that's the honest answer really that we don't know much about the influences of many technologies. But yeah more research IS needed, especially with the increasing amount of EMF. But yeah the real important question that has been raised is has the brain tumors increased since the use of cellphones?( i mean that should be very significant then) And the answer is that there is no real trend in brain tumors. This does not proof that EMF have no effect or anything or that cell phones couldn't still cause some tumors or anything but it does go against the general hypothesis that cell phones increase the risk of braintumors. So yeah this means it is either limited to a specific group that is just showered with emf or there are other factors that cause it.

In any cause you can not just take it as a fact, when researchers haven't conclusively proven it. Unless you think that is what these studies mean.

vincey84 wrote:

Forgotmylogin wrote:

vincey84 wrote:

Forgotmylogin wrote:What about cellphones lowering.sperm count or increasing incidence of brain tumours? Made up too? I think not

https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/ijo.2015.2908
There you go again, show a study that shows this.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3341445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK208983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6240172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278351/

You know, i have read through these. Many of these articles say that more research is needed, then it is about certain exposures. And that's the honest answer really that we don't know much about the influences of many technologies. But yeah more research IS needed, especially with the increasing amount of EMF. But yeah the real important question that has been raised is has the brain tumors increased since the use of cellphones?( i mean that should be very significant then) And the answer is that there is no real trend in brain tumors. This does not proof that EMF have no effect or anything or that cell phones couldn't still cause some tumors or anything but it does go against the general hypothesis that cell phones increase the risk of braintumors. So yeah this means it is either limited to a specific group that is just showered with emf or there are other factors that cause it.

In any cause you can not just take it as a fact, when researchers haven't conclusively proven it. Unless you think that is what these studies mean.

I don't disagree with anything you've said in this post. And by the way I do think these attacks on 5G towers are fake controlled opposition and also that it's nonsense to say 5G causes covid etc, but I still feel if the elites are pushing it in a big way, and they are, there most likely is some very nefarious reasons.

Forgotmylogin wrote:

vincey84 wrote:

Forgotmylogin wrote:

vincey84 wrote:

Forgotmylogin wrote:What about cellphones lowering.sperm count or increasing incidence of brain tumours? Made up too? I think not

https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/ijo.2015.2908
There you go again, show a study that shows this.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3341445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK208983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6240172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278351/

You know, i have read through these. Many of these articles say that more research is needed, then it is about certain exposures. And that's the honest answer really that we don't know much about the influences of many technologies. But yeah more research IS needed, especially with the increasing amount of EMF. But yeah the real important question that has been raised is has the brain tumors increased since the use of cellphones?( i mean that should be very significant then) And the answer is that there is no real trend in brain tumors. This does not proof that EMF have no effect or anything or that cell phones couldn't still cause some tumors or anything but it does go against the general hypothesis that cell phones increase the risk of braintumors. So yeah this means it is either limited to a specific group that is just showered with emf or there are other factors that cause it.

In any cause you can not just take it as a fact, when researchers haven't conclusively proven it. Unless you think that is what these studies mean.

I don't disagree with anything you've said in this post. And by the way I do think these attacks on 5G towers are fake controlled opposition and also that it's nonsense to say 5G causes covid etc, but I still feel if the elites are pushing it in a big way, and they are, there most likely is some very nefarious reasons.

we can agree there. I have learned a little. but yeah looking at the bigger picture you know whats going on right? Everybody in cities being taxed to death being stamped as co2 hazards while they set off most of the earth as protected parks. That is in plans from 50 years back or so. 5g yeah sure it plays a role, probably more to do with monitoring than anything else. I mean high quality cams means you can uncover crazy details and follow everything much better. But im not done with this subject, i will keep a close eye on 5g developments.

vincey84 wrote:

anon1 wrote:

vincey84 wrote:

anon1 wrote:LOGGED IN:


NOT LOGGED IN:


What's going on here? Is this on purpose? Why one has to log in to be able to reach the link? This is bad for non-members that lurk here.

it is a technical thing with the forum only displaying "wrapped" links to logged in users. It could have al kinds of reasons(think of external referrals and linking by unwanted parties), but why is this important?

Like I said, this is preventing some of the information being shared here to reach non-members. A lot of people just like to lurk and will never create an account, so they'll never be able to reach those links. And even if you create an account you'd have to wait to be approved. Besides all that, I keep archiving all the topics here in https://archive.is/ and https://archive.org/ (which is a good practice that not enough people here seem to be doing) and all those links don't get archived and will be lost in case IFERS gets pulled down again.

You just joined. Many people on the forum have stored things not only Eric. That is how the forum got revived several times. It is just pure nonsense.

First, why so rude? I'm not trying to stir any drama.

Second, I said it myself that I didn't have much to contribute to this forum, so I ended up creating an account just a few months ago, even though I've been lurking here since 2017. That's exactly my point, some other lurkers may be unable to access those links. I wasn't trying to say bad things about this forum or its members, I was just trying to point out something that I noticed and I was trying to help. I thought it was an easy fix or I was misunderstanding something.

Third, what I said about archiving was just to encourage more people to archive each and every topic they ever post or read here, eventually we will have all the content of this website available in those famous archives, https://archive.is and https://archive.org. Most of the time when I click in my browser extension to archive some URL here I can't find any other previous archiving (those websites tell you how many times the page has been archived before), so it means that usually I'm the first one to archive most of the pages in this forum on those websites. That's the only reason I said what I said, to encourage more people to do the same, it's common practice in some other conspiracy circles I'm used to. I'm aware you already have a system to deal with this and have already saved this forum before by re-uploaded all its content, I'm glad people here are very diligent and serious in what they do. I just thought that throwing out the idea of more people archiving in those websites would be a good thing, since they are very popular and a lot of people like me still use them to access whole websites that are now gone (you can jump from link to link without ever getting out of Archive.is or Archive.org if the pages have already been archived).

anon1 wrote:

vincey84 wrote:

anon1 wrote:

vincey84 wrote:

anon1 wrote:LOGGED IN:


NOT LOGGED IN:


What's going on here? Is this on purpose? Why one has to log in to be able to reach the link? This is bad for non-members that lurk here.

it is a technical thing with the forum only displaying "wrapped" links to logged in users. It could have al kinds of reasons(think of external referrals and linking by unwanted parties), but why is this important?

Like I said, this is preventing some of the information being shared here to reach non-members. A lot of people just like to lurk and will never create an account, so they'll never be able to reach those links. And even if you create an account you'd have to wait to be approved. Besides all that, I keep archiving all the topics here in https://archive.is/ and https://archive.org/ (which is a good practice that not enough people here seem to be doing) and all those links don't get archived and will be lost in case IFERS gets pulled down again.

You just joined. Many people on the forum have stored things not only Eric. That is how the forum got revived several times. It is just pure nonsense.

First, why so rude? I'm not trying to stir any drama.

Second, I said it myself that I didn't have much to contribute to this forum, so I ended up creating an account just a few months ago, even though I've been lurking here since 2017. That's exactly my point, some other lurkers may be unable to access those links. I wasn't trying to say bad things about this forum or its members, I was just trying to point out something that I noticed and I was trying to help. I thought it was an easy fix or I was misunderstanding something.

Third, what I said about archiving was just to encourage more people to archive each and every topic they ever post or read here, eventually we will have all the content of this website available in those famous archives, https://archive.is and https://archive.org. Most of the time when I click in my browser extension to archive some URL here I can't find any other previous archiving (those websites tell you how many times the page has been archived before), so it means that usually I'm the first one to archive most of the pages in this forum on those websites. That's the only reason I said what I said, to encourage more people to do the same, it's common practice in some other conspiracy circles I'm used to. I'm aware you already have a system to deal with this and have already saved this forum before by re-uploaded all its content, I'm glad people here are very diligent and serious in what they do. I just thought that throwing out the idea of more people archiving in those websites would be a good thing, since they are very popular and a lot of people like me still use them to access whole websites that are now gone (you can jump from link to link without ever getting out of Archive.is or Archive.org if the pages have already been archived).

If this archive thing works, great. Maybe its a good idea to download the stuff onto some physical drive too for safekeeping. But the reason of it takes too long to be approved to the forum is rather lame isn't it...for a forum that has so many topics and stuff to read, it is the least thing you can do. What i personally wouldn't want is to have stuff posted on conspiracy forums and being completely taken out of context. You know why can't people that are interested not come here and discuss it here?

vincey84 wrote:

Forgotmylogin wrote:

vincey84 wrote:

Forgotmylogin wrote:

vincey84 wrote:

Forgotmylogin wrote:What about cellphones lowering.sperm count or increasing incidence of brain tumours? Made up too? I think not

https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/ijo.2015.2908
There you go again, show a study that shows this.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3341445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK208983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6240172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278351/

You know, i have read through these. Many of these articles say that more research is needed, then it is about certain exposures. And that's the honest answer really that we don't know much about the influences of many technologies. But yeah more research IS needed, especially with the increasing amount of EMF. But yeah the real important question that has been raised is has the brain tumors increased since the use of cellphones?( i mean that should be very significant then) And the answer is that there is no real trend in brain tumors. This does not proof that EMF have no effect or anything or that cell phones couldn't still cause some tumors or anything but it does go against the general hypothesis that cell phones increase the risk of braintumors. So yeah this means it is either limited to a specific group that is just showered with emf or there are other factors that cause it.

In any cause you can not just take it as a fact, when researchers haven't conclusively proven it. Unless you think that is what these studies mean.

I don't disagree with anything you've said in this post. And by the way I do think these attacks on 5G towers are fake controlled opposition and also that it's nonsense to say 5G causes covid etc, but I still feel if the elites are pushing it in a big way, and they are, there most likely is some very nefarious reasons.

we can agree there. I have learned a little. but yeah looking at the bigger picture you know whats going on right? Everybody in cities being taxed to death being stamped as co2 hazards while they set off most of the earth as protected parks. That is in plans from 50 years back or so. 5g yeah sure it plays a role, probably more to do with monitoring than anything else. I mean high quality cams means you can uncover crazy details and follow everything much better. But im not done with this subject, i will keep a close eye on 5g developments.

Absolutely. I've also heard and it's very possible that 5G allows the internet of things to interact with the nanochips that will be implanted in people. Another thing which ties covid33 into this is that individuals are difficult to target in groups so the social distancing serves an additional purpose of making that easier. We are living at a time when humanity is as close as ever to being fully controlled by the JWO. But I retain hope of a mass awakening and revolution. What do you make of www.deagel.com and population forecasts?

Studies showing EMW cause illness



Don't agree with some of the misguided nutrition discussion but Tom Cowan deplores big Pharma controlled medicine research, its money hunger scientists and doctors.

susie wrote:Every vaccination period has been linked to a technological leap.  See the graphic above illustrating how each expansion of the use of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) and each new generation of wireless technology has been accompanied by a new disease..

T

This was from the invisible rainbow thinking that tom cowan (jew) regurgitated, and Firstenberg (easy) is still sold on amazon and listed as a best seller. This is a distraction 100% all started with Q and Cowen and Kauffman all jews. Truth will show itself every time

its_Goyim wrote:

susie wrote:Every vaccination period has been linked to a technological leap.  See the graphic above illustrating how each expansion of the use of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) and each new generation of wireless technology has been accompanied by a new disease..

T

This was from the invisible rainbow thinking that tom cowan (jew) regurgitated, and Firstenberg (easy) is still sold on amazon and listed as a best seller. This is a distraction 100% all started with Q and Cowen and Kauffman all jews. Truth will show itself every time

I don’t know if this is true or not. And it’s fine to be skeptical based on a groups previous lies but I don’t think it’s fair to outright cast the entire theory aside because one person who you don’t trust said it was true. You need to look at the theory on its own merit.

Tree wrote:

its_Goyim wrote:

susie wrote:Every vaccination period has been linked to a technological leap.  See the graphic above illustrating how each expansion of the use of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) and each new generation of wireless technology has been accompanied by a new disease..

T

This was from the invisible rainbow thinking that tom cowan (jew) regurgitated, and Firstenberg (easy) is still sold on amazon and listed as a best seller. This is a distraction 100% all started with Q and Cowen and Kauffman all jews. Truth will show itself every time

I don’t know if this is true or not. And it’s fine to be skeptical based on a groups previous lies but I don’t think it’s fair to outright cast the entire theory aside because one person who you don’t trust said it was true. You need to look at the theory on its own merit.

I have that was just one example if you look at the beginning 0g theory and then read the poisoned needle by Elenore mcbean or vaccination the silent killer by Elenore and Ida you will see it had nothing to do with radio waves or G's so to speak. Here are the free PDF's if anyone wants to take a gander. Her original book on amazon was like 700 dollars, so obviously they didnt want people reading it. So heres to saving 800 bucks.

https://www.amazon.com/Poisoned-Needle-Supressed-Facts-Vaccination/dp/B00347PUJW/ref=sr_1_5?crid=R4AD26MPZD9T&dchild=1&keywords=the+poisoned+needle+mcbean&qid=1635513572&qsid=145-8390264-6896816&sprefix=The+Poisoned+needle%2Caps%2C164&sr=8-5&sres=B095NMNPL2%2CB083QLCKN8%2CB013PT3YQE%2CB001OMOO3W%2CB00347PUJW%2C1852287772%2CB079Z48RKC%2CB08LX8Q3H2%2CB08JP8WKN4%2CB01576DWQU%2CB012RGU4EQ%2CB07JH8GZBC%2CB010TSRAEG%2CB07SSQX7VH%2CB0115WOB0G%2CB01GGGS8XW

https://archive.org/details/the-poisoned-needle

https://archive.org/details/vaccinationsilen00hono

susie wrote:

"No Amount of Evidence (will ever persuade an idiot)"
Translation: "Everyone that doesn't beLIEve in the same unfounded theories as I do is an idiot" (ad hominem attacks are proof though right?)
You've posted 59 times in this thread but haven't provided one experiment everyone can do proving 5g is harmful


here is me first posting in this thread asking for personal proof that 5g is harmful

susie wrote:Personal experience beats any so called agenda driven information for me

So tell me, why should i beLIEve your agenda driven information rather than my own personal experience showing that 5g isn't harmful and simply is shill nonsense

Gonna tell me to put my head in a microwave?

susie wrote:95GHz waves for the active denial system.  Read the description of this vid about it burning your skin.  It is like being in a microwave oven.

susie wrote:Would you willingly sit inside a microwave oven when it is tirned on? Put a fork inside the microwave and turn it on.
There is your experiment criteria.

"Personal experience beats any so called agenda driven information for me" I'll be looking forward to your unbiased non agenda driven information that isn't from shills and includes something everyone can do to PERSONALLY KNOW WITH 100% certainty that 5g is harmful

Russian Blue Cat wrote:

susie wrote:

"No Amount of Evidence (will ever persuade an idiot)"
Translation: "Everyone that doesn't beLIEve in the same unfounded theories as I do is an idiot" (ad hominem attacks are proof though right?)
You've posted 59 times in this thread but haven't provided one experiment everyone can do proving 5g is harmful


here is me first posting in this thread asking for personal proof that 5g is harmful

susie wrote:Personal experience beats any so called agenda driven information for me

So tell me, why should i beLIEve your agenda driven information rather than my own personal experience showing that 5g isn't harmful and simply is shill nonsense

Gonna tell me to put my head in a microwave?

susie wrote:95GHz waves for the active denial system.  Read the description of this vid about it burning your skin.  It is like being in a microwave oven.

susie wrote:Would you willingly sit inside a microwave oven when it is tirned on? Put a fork inside the microwave and turn it on.
There is your experiment criteria.

"Personal experience beats any so called agenda driven information for me" I'll be looking forward to your unbiased non agenda driven information that isn't from shills and includes something everyone can do to PERSONALLY KNOW WITH 100% certainty that 5g is harmful

Yes. We all have multimillion dollar 5g equipment at home to conduct experimentation with. When anyone shares a link from MSM you dismiss it as jewish lies. There’s goes your earnest request for unbiased non agenda driven information. All news information is agenda driven. Some desire to spread truth and justice. Others want to push for or control a narrative. It’s all agenda driven.

tycho_brahe wrote:Yes. We all have multimillion dollar 5g equipment at home to conduct experimentation with.

Translation: The only way to experimentally prove 5g is harmful is with multimillion dollar 5g equipment.
This is similar to "outer space" only able to be proven to exist by going to outer space, similar to proving "gravity" can cause smaller masses to "orbit" larger masses by going into "outer space" on spaceships "orbiting" earth like the ISS. This is tycho_brahes way of excusing the fact that he hasn't experimentally proven to himself that 5g is harmful because he doesn't have "special equipment"

tycho_brahe wrote:When anyone shares a link from MSM you dismiss it as jewish lies. There’s goes your earnest request for unbiased non agenda driven information. All news information is agenda driven. Some desire to spread truth and justice. Others want to push for or control a narrative. It’s all agenda driven.

Posting something from the mainstream media as your proof that 5g is harmful when i'm asking for personal experiments you have done to prove 5g is harmful, or do you expect me to trust you (a stranger) posting mainstream media links (more strangers that are known liars)
"There’s goes your earnest request for unbiased non agenda driven information."
Translation: Jewish Mainstream Media is unbiased non agenda driven information because the links and info tycho_brahe (a stranger) shares is to be regarded as 100% truth and not be questioned and if you do question it you're the one that's biased and agenda driven for not trusting the Jewish mainstream media articles that tycho_brahe shares

"All news information is agenda driven."
Not articles you agree with right? but wait, that sounds like your dismissing the news as agenda driven.

"Some desire to spread truth and justice. Others want to push for or control a narrative. It’s all agenda driven."
But you clearly have no agendas, or bias by citing mainstream media sources when being asked for experimental proof that 5g is harmful

"It’s all agenda driven" "All news information is agenda driven" "Others want to push for or control a narrative."
Geee I wonder why I would "dismiss" agenda driven mainstream news controlled by jews when I've only been asking for experimental proof that 5g is harmful for almost 2 years now

Stop with your close-minded bias, go do an experiment that proves your beLIEfs, then come and post it here so we can replicate it instead of writing off people for not beLIEving in "agenda driven news pushing and controlling narratives"

Hi Russian Blue Cat,

It seems you are extremely skeptical of 5G or a shill for them. I don't believe you are a shill and hope you are not. Just like you have stated to many others you are a stranger so do not expect me to trust that you are not a shill but based on your previous posts I believe you are not. I would like to present you some of my personal experience, and work experience. I then will ask you to do an experiment and record it and report back to us with your results. The signals the 5G towers are producing are going to be positive, negative or neutral as far as impacting human health. It is a safe bet to say that they are not positive but if you have evidence to prove otherwise then please provide it. That leaves the choice that they are either neutral or negative. There are military weapons that use similar technology that have shown to have negative effects on people. There are also other experiments out there that show frequency having effect on people's behavior and health. From your comments it seems you do not believe these experiments because you are unable to perform them yourself. Unlike satellites these towers are easily visible and are receiving a constant power supply. They received a huge push for install during COVID19 which received a great deal of funding from the government. Is the reason they pushed this just to waste money? I do not think so as wasting tax payer money is one thing but wasting that much material doesn't make sense.

I graduated college in May of 2019 with a degree in agricultural engineering. I struggled to find work after college and eventually got a job working as a designer for a company that works on utilities. At this company I designed underground and aerial(on poles) routes for the fiber for 5G. At the time of starting this job I didn't think 5G was all that bad. I thought it was rather overexaggerated in some ways. Working there I learned of the hard deadlines the government wanted to meet through the company they used called everstream (it's spelled lower case). This company wanted these fibers put in quickly but with all the rules and regulations that municipalities have it was not possible. Many installs were rushed and by doing this they daisy chained together many towers. By doing this if one tower is taken out it will likely impact others and could domino in some locations. They installed the fiber routes so quickly and were so demanding about it that they wanted the company I worked for to hook up to poles that were already overloaded or would overload them(poles could break). They said they didn't care because the work needed done which caused some issues with legality and safety. How they were installing the cable for 5G was interesting to me as around the city(Columbus, Ohio) I live near had the routes completely surround the city and then the more populated areas were extended a little further. It looks as if they were trying to cage people by these towers and routes as they would go past the population density similar to a cage. I would comment more about the technology but you won't believe me so why waste my time.

I did learn about another way we are getting screwed and having our money stolen from us by these companies and the government. The government will hire a company like everstream to install fiber on public land. They will do the install and make the vent far larger than they were contracted to do for the job for more cable to be able to fit in it. After they will sell the space that tax money paid for to companies at a high price. Sometimes they will lease the space and get a constant stream of money. This cost will then get put back on the consumer who paid for the fiber and vent in the first place via taxation and monthly billing charges. So in many locations Verizon and AT&T are not paying for their installs as they get grants for them to do the same thing. They then will turn around and charge you for it again. If you have doubts on my education or work experience then feel free to PM me and I'll try provide you evidence that should be satisfactory.

This was around April-May 2020. I play a lot of disc golf and my fiancé and I decided to take a walk near a course we play at. As we were walking I started to notice a tickling in my throat. I was like man this is weird as I had been feeling great that day. We continue walking and now I begin to cough on occasion and my eyes begin to water. We walk a little further and I notice a 5G tower about 100-200 feet away from me. It was a big wtf as I never even seen the thing go up and have went to this park multiple times. My fiancé says something along the lines of it's the 5G I told you so. I say f it and want to walk closer to see if this is really what is causing it. I walk closer and my symptoms get worse and worse. We then head back to my car and after we got some distance from the tower the symptoms started to go away. I have since replicated the experiment multiple times. That's my direct lived experience so your "I don't believe you" matters very little to me as I know it's true so I could careless what you think. You can continue to hate on others who are providing evidence that it is harmful but you just plugging your ears and screaming no doesn't make you right. These things cost millions and millions of dollars and the average person doesn't have access to this technology as much as you want to play the you can't prove it game. The idea that any of us could afford it or would want to to perform experiments we believe are harmful is ass backwards. If I had that kind of money I would use it for flat earth research, not 5G. I don't want to put animals through torture by blasting them with harmful frequencies. Even if I did do those experiments based on what you have said you would not believe me as well as normies would deny it as well. Very little incentive for us to do so. You have been asking for an experiment that everyone can do so I will provide you with one and I expect you to come back with documented results as you are so hard lined on wanting an experiment.

Go out and find a 5G tower near you(a big one, not the little baby ones). Do your due diligence and make sure that the 5G is actually turned on at whichever tower you choose. This is something you may need to do some work to be sure. Stay near the tower for a 24 hour period and I mean try to get as close as possible without getting in any legal trouble. I think you should stay at least within 50 feet of the tower. I think if you find one in a field that would work best. Choose different activities to do while staying there for 24 hours. I want to give you some of the freedom to choose as it could be rather boring staying there. I think activities you should do are exercise, meditation, sleep, and some sort of strategy game. During this time document if you are feeling any abnormalities and I would say try to video record the whole day if possible. If you feel completely normal and feel nothing obviously document that as well. I would prefer for you to just do a 24 hour livestream. I look forward to your experiment and the results.

Another issues that we can not see or experiment for is if these frequencies are negatively impacting the spiritual/astral realms. I don't know whether they are or not but if they are then I would error on the side that it is bad.

Lightning_Peasant wrote:Hi Russian Blue Cat,

It seems you are extremely skeptical of 5G or a shill for them. I don't believe you are a shill and hope you are not. Just like you have stated to many others you are a stranger so do not expect me to trust that you are not a shill but based on your previous posts I believe you are not.

Asking for experimental proof that 5g is harmful for almost 2 years means I'm a shill?
Do you react this way when people ask for an experiment proving flat earth, you immediately call them a skeptic or a shill

Lightning_Peasant wrote:There are military weapons that use similar technology that have shown to have negative effects on people

Because the military can be trusted, why do you expect me to trust strangers that are known liars rather than my own experience?

Lightning_Peasant wrote:There are also other experiments out there that show frequency having effect on people's behavior and health. From your comments it seems you do not believe these experiments because you are unable to perform them yourself.

Cites strangers "experiments" doesn't provide any link to so called experiments and expects me to beLIEve them, but i'm the shill

Lightning_Peasant wrote:Unlike satellites these towers are easily visible and are receiving a constant power supply. They received a huge push for install during COVID19 which received a great deal of funding from the government. Is the reason they pushed this just to waste money? I do not think so as wasting tax payer money is one thing but wasting that much material doesn't make sense.

So the only reason they would put up these towers is to "waste money" not give better internet to people?

Lightning_Peasant wrote:I play a lot of disc golf and my fiancé and I decided to take a walk near a course we play at. As we were walking I started to notice a tickling in my throat. I was like man this is weird as I had been feeling great that day. We continue walking and now I begin to cough on occasion and my eyes begin to water. We walk a little further and I notice a 5G tower

Couldn't it be some sort of allergy that caused you to get a tickling in your throat, which caused coughing which can cause your eyes to water, and how did you know it was a 5g tower, I need to be able to identify them for my own experiments.

Lightning_Peasant wrote:I say f it and want to walk closer to see if this is really what is causing it. I walk closer and my symptoms get worse and worse. We then head back to my car and after we got some distance from the tower the symptoms started to go away.

symptoms get worse meaning the symptoms you mentioned previously, or new ones? Couldn't it have been you were playing disc golf/walking and pollen in the air in that area caused you to have those symptoms then as you left that area it cleared up? Is this your only experiment or have you done others near 5g towers?

Lightning_Peasant wrote:You can continue to hate on others who are providing evidence that it is harmful but you just plugging your ears and screaming no doesn't make you right.

How is asking for experimental proof that 5g is harmful hateful? Who are these unnamed people "providing evidence that it is harmful" and what experiments have they provided that everyone can do.

Lightning_Peasant wrote:but you just plugging your ears and screaming no doesn't make you right. as much as you want to play the you can't prove it game

Why are you so hostile and abrasive because someone is asking for experimental proof? Do you react this way when talking about flat earth with people as well?