GPS - Cell Tower - Microwave - 5G

Realearth wrote:

Please read Senate Bill 637, tell us, what makes this Bill fiction, with no proof or facts as you say.

Does this bill proof there is an APOCALYPSE coming because of harmful radiation?

this guy literally says the next thing is skynet and terminators. Doesnt that ring some kind of BS meter when you watch such a youtube movie? This is completely besides if 5g is harmful or not.

This reminds me of Delgado’s mind control.

vincey84 wrote:this guy literally says the next thing is skynet and terminators. Doesnt that ring some kind of BS meter when you watch such a youtube movie? This is completely besides if 5g is harmful or not.

Just continue following this thread and you will soon wake up.

Peace

Realearth wrote:

vincey84 wrote:this guy literally says the next thing is skynet and terminators. Doesnt that ring some kind of BS meter when you watch such a youtube movie? This is completely besides if 5g is harmful or not.

Just continue following this thread and you will soon wake up.

Peace

why do you accept this behavior of burning down towers? It is not only simply destroying communication infrastructure that has nothing to do with 5g but also they can just build other ones. Are you someone that thinks that some kind of violent revolution is necessary? and end your post with peace?

UK Government to remove all Huawei 5G infrastructure by 2023

Voice To Skull Microwave Technology

MIND CONTROL VIA ELECTRONIC TORTURE

The More You Know

CHD VS FCC
Evidentiary Brief Filing

susie wrote:MIND CONTROL VIA ELECTRONIC TORTURE

Again, why are these links not showing up if one isn't logged in? Is that on purpose?

LOGGED IN:


NOT LOGGED IN:


What's going on here? Is this on purpose? Why one has to log in to be able to reach the link? This is bad for non-members that lurk here.

susie wrote:
CHD VS FCC
Evidentiary Brief Filing

I'm always deeply suspicious of 'women' that have that all too familiar transgender look that is prevalent in Hollywood, TV personalities, Sports personalities etc etc. And Kennedy, despite what appears to be fighting vaccines etc, always has me deeply suspicious of controlled opposition simply because he is a Kennedy. What do others members think? I guess even controlled opposition getting info out is better than no publicity, right?

anon1 wrote:LOGGED IN:


NOT LOGGED IN:


What's going on here? Is this on purpose? Why one has to log in to be able to reach the link? This is bad for non-members that lurk here.

it is a technical thing with the forum only displaying "wrapped" links to logged in users. It could have al kinds of reasons(think of external referrals and linking by unwanted parties), but why is this important?

vincey84 wrote:

anon1 wrote:LOGGED IN:


NOT LOGGED IN:


What's going on here? Is this on purpose? Why one has to log in to be able to reach the link? This is bad for non-members that lurk here.

it is a technical thing with the forum only displaying "wrapped" links to logged in users. It could have al kinds of reasons(think of external referrals and linking by unwanted parties), but why is this important?

Like I said, this is preventing some of the information being shared here to reach non-members. A lot of people just like to lurk and will never create an account, so they'll never be able to reach those links. And even if you create an account you'd have to wait to be approved. Besides all that, I keep archiving all the topics here in https://archive.is/ and https://archive.org/ (which is a good practice that not enough people here seem to be doing) and all those links don't get archived and will be lost in case IFERS gets pulled down again.

I've been lurking here since 2017, it was just a few months ago that I decided to create an account. I don't think I have much to contribute to yet, that's why I didn't create an account before. I suspect a lot of regular readers here are non-members in a similar situation.

Forgotmylogin wrote:

susie wrote:
CHD VS FCC
Evidentiary Brief Filing

I'm always deeply suspicious of 'women' that have that all too familiar transgender look that is prevalent in Hollywood, TV personalities, Sports personalities etc etc. And Kennedy, despite what appears to be fighting vaccines etc, always has me deeply suspicious of controlled opposition simply because he is a Kennedy. What do others members think? I guess even controlled opposition getting info out is better than no publicity, right?

"I guess even controlled opposition getting info out is better than no publicity, right?"
Why would you even think this? So controlled opposition agents mixing truth and lies together is good? Weird shilly stuff your posting their stranger

anon1 wrote:

vincey84 wrote:

anon1 wrote:LOGGED IN:


NOT LOGGED IN:


What's going on here? Is this on purpose? Why one has to log in to be able to reach the link? This is bad for non-members that lurk here.

it is a technical thing with the forum only displaying "wrapped" links to logged in users. It could have al kinds of reasons(think of external referrals and linking by unwanted parties), but why is this important?

Like I said, this is preventing some of the information being shared here to reach non-members. A lot of people just like to lurk and will never create an account, so they'll never be able to reach those links. And even if you create an account you'd have to wait to be approved. Besides all that, I keep archiving all the topics here in https://archive.is/ and https://archive.org/ (which is a good practice that not enough people here seem to be doing) and all those links don't get archived and will be lost in case IFERS gets pulled down again.

You just joined. Many people on the forum have stored things not only Eric. That is how the forum got revived several times. It is just pure nonsense.

Russian Blue Cat wrote:

Forgotmylogin wrote:

susie wrote:
CHD VS FCC
Evidentiary Brief Filing

I'm always deeply suspicious of 'women' that have that all too familiar transgender look that is prevalent in Hollywood, TV personalities, Sports personalities etc etc. And Kennedy, despite what appears to be fighting vaccines etc, always has me deeply suspicious of controlled opposition simply because he is a Kennedy. What do others members think? I guess even controlled opposition getting info out is better than no publicity, right?

"I guess even controlled opposition getting info out is better than no publicity, right?"
Why would you even think this? So controlled opposition agents mixing truth and lies together is good? Weird shilly stuff your posting their stranger

Firstly it's there not their. Secondly that's a bit of a leap, calling me a shill for that post. Or suggesting it. Only because I chose to mention it's most likely controlled opposition. You do realize that probably 99% of video makers are controlled opposition right? I don't see you calling shilly behavior on anyone posting all the various videos. People like David Icke, Max Igan and most likely RFK Jr + many of the protests are probably controlled opposition. See, I was simply calling out the fact that those using the Jew tranny trick probably can't be trusted but I still feel if the majority of sheep can be woken up, even by cointelpro, we at least have a chance of stopping the Elite inbred jew scum from imprisoning us by 2021 or forcing us to take nanochip vaccine to simply fly in a plane (around the plane). I've been a flat earther for around 5 years. I had a previous account but forgot the password and couldn't reset it as it was associated with a safemail email account (which I abandoned when I found out it was based in Israel - WTF!). I've even supported Eric by buying two of his excellent books, have you? I have been banned from other forums for calling out the jew hand in much of the bullshit we have to put up with today, I'd appreciate a non-hostile reception here.

vincey84 wrote:why do you accept this behavior of burning down towers? It is not only simply destroying communication infrastructure that has nothing to do with 5g but also they can just build other ones. Are you someone that thinks that some kind of violent revolution is necessary? and end your post with peace?

The 'Burning down of those towers' is nothing more than fake news. Nobody is burning down anything, and this events are just created in the news to ridicule 'conspiracy theorists' that have been fooled with the fear for 5G radiation by controlled opposition in the alternative media.

fight windmills or tilt at windmills
to fight imaginary evils or opponents (5G)
from Don Quixote's charging at windmills under the delusion that they were giants

Just Vital wrote:

vincey84 wrote:why do you accept this behavior of burning down towers? It is not only simply destroying communication infrastructure that has nothing to do with 5g but also they can just build other ones. Are you someone that thinks that some kind of violent revolution is necessary? and end your post with peace?

The 'Burning down of those towers' is nothing more than fake news. Nobody is burning down anything, and this events are just created in the news to ridicule 'conspiracy theorists' that have been fooled with the fear for 5G radiation by controlled opposition in the alternative media.

fight windmills or tilt at windmills
to fight imaginary evils or opponents (5G)
from Don Quixote's charging at windmills under the delusion that they were giants

Look 5G may not cause a fake Covidiot33 virus but all EMFs are harmful to humans, especially when in close proximity to cell.towers. So the fact there are going to be way more towers erected means greater harm. And that doesn't include any potentially increased damaging effects from the new higher frequencies being used. Electroporation, even.if the mechanism is different to what is claimed, appears to have the potential to cause more detox symptoms I.e viral infections.

I am aware that events might be staged Just Vital, but couldn't it just be some people that really believe this? A lot of the 5g are pushed in the conspiracy corner, but mostly of their own fault. The most I have seen are people talking out of their asses showing the same test results on some rats that died very quick anyway, a completely unreliable test. I want to see the dangers and more testing is of course a good thing, but very little of solid evidence is offered and more of a exaggerated conspiracy theory is linked to it. But yeah I think it should be carefully studied. The 5g look like fools with or without the burning of towers that is my point.

Look Forgotmylogin, provide something that shows the harm. The towers make use of these kind of beam technologies that can't penetrate the human body. However I am for the research and slower roll out of 5g, because it is better to be on the safe side. But honestly so much is claimed to an extend that i think is not in relation to the facts.