Gravity Does Not Exist!

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by Admin on Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:36 pm





If you fill a balloon with helium, a substance lighter than the nitrogen, oxygen and other elements which compose the air around it, the balloon will immediately fly upwards. If you fill a balloon with hydrogen, a substance even lighter than helium, the balloon will fly upwards even faster. If you blow a dandelion seed out of your hands, a substance just barely heavier than the air, it will float away and slowly but eventually fall to the ground. And if you drop an anvil from your hands, something much heavier than the air, it will quickly and directly fall straight to the ground. Now, this has absolutely nothing to do with “gravity.” The fact that light things rise up and heavy things fall down is simply a natural property of weight. That is very different from “gravity.” Gravity is a hypothetical magnetic-like force possessed by large masses which Isaac Newton needed to help explain the heliocentric theory of the universe.



“Most people in England have either read, or heard, that Sir Isaac Newton’s theory of gravitation was originated by his seeing an apple fall to the earth from a tree in his garden. Persons gifted with ordinary common-sense would say that the apple fell down to the earth because, bulk for bulk, it was heavier than the surrounding air; but if, instead of the apple, a fluffy feather had been detached from the tree, a breeze would probably have sent the feather floating away, and the feather would not reach the earth until the surrounding air became so still that, by virtue of its own density, the feather would fall to the ground.” -Lady Blount, “Clarion’s Science Versus God’s Truth” (40)



Wilbur Voliva, a famous flat-Earther in the early 20th century, gave lectures all over America against Newtonian astronomy. He would begin by walking on stage with a book, a balloon, a feather and a brick, and ask the audience: “How is it that a law of gravitation can pull up a toy balloon and cannot put up a brick? I throw up this book. Why doesn’t it go on up? That book went up as far as the force behind it forced it and it fell because it was heavier than the air and that is the only reason. I cut the string of a toy balloon. It rises, gets to a certain height and then it begins to settle. I take this brick and a feather. I blow the feather. Yonder it goes. Finally, it begins to settle and comes down. This brick goes up as far as the force forces it and then it comes down because it is heavier than the air. That is all.”

“Any object which is heavier than the air, and which is unsupported, has a natural tendency to fall by its own weight. Newton's famous apple at Woolsthorpe, or any other apple when ripe, loses hold of its stalk, and, being heavier than the air, drops as a matter of necessity, to the ground, totally irrespective of any attraction of the Earth. For, if such attraction existed, why does not the Earth attract the rising smoke which is not nearly so heavy as the apple? The answer is simple - because the smoke is lighter than the air, and, therefore, does not fall but ascends. Gravitation is only a subterfuge, employed by Newton in his attempt to prove that the Earth revolves round the Sun, and the quicker it is relegated to the tomb of all the Capulets, the better will it be for all classes of society.” -David Wardlaw Scott, “Terra Firma” (Cool



“The ‘law of gravitation’ is said by the advocates of the Newtonian system of astronomy, to be the greatest discovery of science, and the foundation of the whole of modern astronomy. If, therefore, it can be shown that gravitation is a pure assumption, and an imagination of the mind only, that it has no existence outside of the brains of its expounders and advocates, the whole of the hypotheses of this modern so-called science fall to the ground as flat as the surface of the ocean, and this ‘most exact of all sciences,’ this wonderful ‘feat of the intellect’ becomes at once the most ridiculous superstition and the most gigantic imposture to which ignorance and credulity could ever be exposed.” -Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (36)



Einstein’s theory of relativity and the entire heliocentric model of the universe hinges upon Newton’s “law of gravitation.” Heliocentrists claim that the Sun is the most massive object in the heavens, more massive even than the Earth, and therefore the Earth and other planets by “law” are caught up in the Sun’s “gravity” and forced to orbit perpetual circles/ellipses around it. They claim that gravity also somehow allows people, buildings, the oceans, and all of nature to exist on the under-side of their “ball-Earth” without falling off.

Now, even if gravity did exist, why would it cause both planets to orbit the Sun and people to stick to the Earth? Gravity should either cause people to float in suspended circular orbits around the Earth, or it should cause the Earth to be pulled and crash into the Sun! What sort of magic is “gravity” that it can glue people’s feet to the ball-Earth, while causing Earth itself to revolve ellipses round the Sun? The two effects are very different yet the same cause is attributed to both.

“Take the case of a shot propelled from a cannon. By the force of the explosion and the influence of the reputed action of gravitation, the shot forms a parabolic curve, and finally falls to the earth. Here we may ask, why - if the forces are the same, viz., direct impulse and gravitation - does not the shot form an orbit like that of a planet, and revolve round the earth? The Newtonian may reply, because the impulse which propelled the shot is temporary; and the impulse which propelled the planet is permanent. Precisely so; but why is the impulse permanent in the case of the planet revolving round the sun? What is the cause of this permanence?” -N. Crossland, “New Principia”



“If the sun is pulling with such power at the earth and all her sister planets, why do they not fall down upon him?” -A. Giberne, “Sun, Moon, and Stars” (27)

Furthermore, this magnetic-like attraction of massive objects gravity is purported to have can be found nowhere in the natural world. There is no example in nature of a massive sphere or any other shaped-object which by virtue of its mass alone causes smaller objects to stick to or orbit around it! There is nothing on Earth massive enough that it can be shown to cause even a dust-bunny to stick to or orbit around it! Try spinning a wet tennis ball or any other spherical object with smaller things placed on its surface and you will find that everything falls or flies off, and nothing sticks to or orbits it. To claim the existence of a physical “law” without a single practical evidential example is hearsay, not science.

“That bodies in some instances are seen to approach each other is a fact; but that their mutual approach is due to an ‘ attraction,’ or pulling process, on the part of these bodies, is, after all, a mere theory. Hypotheses may be sometimes admissible, but when they are invented to support other hypotheses, they are not only to be doubted but discredited and discarded. The hypothesis of a universal force called Gravitation is based upon, and was indeed invented with a view to support another hypothesis, namely, that the earth and sea together make up a vast globe, whirling away through space, and therefore needing some force or forces to guide it in its mad career, and so control it as to make it conform to what is called its annual orbit round the sun! The theory first of all makes the earth to be a globe; then not a perfect globe, but an oblate spheroid, flattened at the ‘poles’; then more oblate, until it was in danger of becoming so flattened that it would be like a cheese; and, passing over minor variations of form, we are finally told that the earth is pear-shaped, and that the ‘elipsoid has been replaced by an apoid!’ What shape it may assume next we cannot tell; it will depend upon the whim or fancy of some astute and speculating ‘scientist.’” -Lady Blount and Albert Smith, “Zetetic Astronomy” (14)



How is it that “gravity” is so strong that it can hold all the oceans, buildings and people stuck to the under-side of the ball-Earth, but so weak that it allows birds, bugs, smoke, and balloons to casually evade its grips completely!? How is it that “gravity” holds our bodies clung to the under-side of the ball-Earth, but yet we can easily raise our legs and arms, walk or jump and feel no such constant downward pulling force? How is it that “gravity” can cause planets to revolve elliptical orbits around a single center of attraction? Ellipses by nature require two foci, and the force of gravitation would have to regularly increase and decrease to keep planets in constant orbit and prevent pulling them into direct collision courses!

“That the sun’s path is an exact circle for only about four periods in a year, and then of only a few hours - at the equinoxes and solstices - completely disproves the ‘might have been’ of circular gravitation, and by consequence, of all gravitation … If the sun were of sufficient power to retain the earth in its orbit when nearest the sun, when the earth arrived at that part of its elliptical path farthest from the sun, the attractive force (unless very greatly increased) would be utterly incapable of preventing the earth rushing away into space ‘in a right line forever,’ as astronomers say. On the other hand, it is equally clear that if the sun’s attraction were just sufficient to keep the earth in its proper path when farthest from the sun, and thus to prevent it rushing off into space; the same power of attraction when the earth was nearest the sun would be so much greater, that (unless the attraction were very greatly diminished) nothing would prevent the earth rushing towards and being absorbed by the sun, there being no counterbalancing focus to prevent such a catastrophe! As astronomy makes no reference to the increase and diminution of the attractive force of the sun, called gravitation, for the above necessary purposes, we are again forced to the conclusion that the great ‘discovery’ of which astronomers are so proud is absolutely non-existent.” -Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (44-45)



“We are asked by the Newtonian to believe that the action of gravitation, which we can easily overcome by the slightest exercise of volition in raising an hand or a foot, is so overwhelmingly violent when we lose our balance and fall a distance of a few feet, that this force, which is imperceptible under usual conditions, may, under extraordinary circumstances, cause the fracture of every limb we possess? Common-sense must reject this interpretation. Gravitation does not furnish a satisfactory explanation of the phenomena here described, whereas the definition of weight already given does, for a body seeking in the readiest manner its level of stability would produce precisely the result experienced. If the influence which kept us securely attached to this earth were identical with that which is powerful enough to disturb a distant planet in its orbit, we should be more immediately conscious of its masterful presence and potency; whereas this influence is so impotent in the very spot where it is supposed to be most dominant that we find an insurmountable difficulty in accepting the idea of its existence.” -N. Crossland, “New Principia”

Heliocentrists claim the ball-Earth is perpetually spinning on its axis at a mind-numbing 1,038 miles per hour, or 19 miles per second, and somehow people, animals, buildings, oceans, and other surface phenomena can stick to the under-side of the spinning ball without falling or flying off. Take a ride on the “Gravitron” at your local amusement park, however, and notice how the faster it spins, the more you are pushed away from the center of spin, not towards it. Even if the centripetal (inward pulling) force of gravity did exist, which it does not, the centrifugal (outward pushing) force of the ball-Earth’s supposed 19 mile per second spin would also exist and have to be overcome, yet neither of these opposing forces have ever been shown to have any existence outside the imaginations of heliocentric “scientists.”



“Gravitation is the term now used to ‘explain’ what common-sense people look upon as inexplicable. Globularists say that all orbs in space are globes gravitating towards each other in proportion to their magnitude and power of attraction - there being a ‘centripetal’ force (tending towards the center) and a ‘centrifugal’ force (tending from the center); but how inert matter can set up any automatic force, and cause one body to gravitate towards another body, has never yet been made palpable to the senses. It belongs to the regions of Metaphysics (‘existing only in thought’).” -Lady Blunt, “Clarion’s Science Versus God’s Truth” (40-41)

“We are not like flies which, by the peculiar conformation of their feet, can crawl on a ball, but we are human being, who require a plane surface on which to walk; and how could we be fastened to the Earth whirling, according to your theory, around the Sun, at the rate of eighteen miles per second? The famed law of Gravitation will not avail, though we are told that we have fifteen pounds of atmosphere pressing on every square inch of our bodies, but this does not appear to be particularly logical, for there are many athletes who can leap nearly their own height, and run a mile race in less than five minutes, which they could not possibly do were they thus handicapped.” -David Wardlaw Scott, “Terra Firma” (3)

“The attraction of gravitation is said to be stronger at the surface of the earth than at a distance from it. Is it so? If I spring upwards perpendicularly I cannot with all my might ascend more than four feet from the ground; but if I jump in a curve with a low trajectory, keeping my highest elevation about three feet, I might clear at a bound a space above the earth of about eighteen feet; so that practically I can overcome the so-called force (pull) at the distance of four feet, in the proportion of 18 to 4, being the very reverse of what I ought to be able to do according to the Newtonian hypothesis.” -N. Crossland, “New Principia”



Newton also theorized and it is now commonly taught that the Earth’s ocean tides are caused by gravitational lunar attraction. If the Moon is only 2,160 miles in diameter and the Earth 8,000 miles, however, using their own math and “law,” it follows that the Earth is 87 times more massive and therefore the larger object should attract the smaller to it, and not the other way around. If the Earth’s greater gravity is what keeps the Moon in orbit, it is impossible for the Moon’s lesser gravity to supersede the Earth’s gravity at Earth’s sea-level, where its gravitational attraction would even further out-trump the Moon’s. Not to mention, the velocity and path of the Moon are uniform and should therefore exert a uniform influence on the Earth’s tides, when in actuality the Earth’s tides vary greatly. Furthermore, if ocean tides are caused by the Moon’s gravitation, how is it that lakes, ponds, and other smaller bodies of standing water remain outside the Moon’s grasp, while the gigantic oceans are so effected!?

“If the moon lifted up the water, it is evident that near the land, the water would be drawn away and low instead of high tide caused. Again, the velocity and path of the moon are uniform, and it follows that if she exerted any influence on the earth, that influence could only be a uniform influence. But the tides are not uniform. At Port Natal the rise and fall is about 6 feet, while at Beira, about 600 miles up the coast, the rise and fall is 26 feet. This effectually settles the matter that the moon has no influence on the tides. Tides are caused by the gentle and gradual rise and fall of the earth on the bosom of the mighty deep. In inland lakes, there are no tides; which also proves that the moon cannot attract either the earth or water to cause tides. But the fact that the basin of the lake is on the earth which rests on the waters of the deep shows that no tides are possible, as the waters of the lakes together with the earth rise and fall, and thus the tides at the coast are caused; while there are no tides on waters unconnected with the sea.” -Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (130-131)

“It is affirmed that the intensity of attraction increases with proximity, and vice versâ. How, then, when the waters are drawn up by the moon from their bed, and away from the earth's attraction,--which at that greater distance from the centre is considerably diminished, while that of the moon is proportionately increased--is it possible that all the waters acted on should be prevented leaving the earth and flying away to the moon? If the moon has power of attraction sufficient to lift the waters of the earth at all, even a single inch from their deepest receptacles, where the earth's attraction is much the greater, there is nothing in the theory of attraction of gravitation to prevent her taking to herself all the waters which come within her influence. Let the smaller body once overcome the power of the larger, and the power of the smaller becomes greater than when it first operated, because the matter acted on is nearer to it. Proximity is greater, and therefore power is greater … How then can the waters of the ocean immediately underneath the moon flow towards the shores, and so cause a flood tide? Water flows, it is said, through the law of gravity, or attraction of the earth's centre; is it possible then for the moon, having once overcome the power of the earth, to let go her hold upon the waters, through the influence of a power which she has conquered, and which therefore, is less than her own? … The above and other difficulties which exist in connection with the explanation of the tides afforded by the Newtonian system, have led many, including Sir Isaac Newton himself, to admit that such explanation is the least satisfactory portion of the ‘theory of gravitation.’ Thus we have been carried forward by the sheer force of evidence to the conclusion that the tides of the sea do not arise from the attraction of the moon, but simply from the rising and falling of the floating earth in the waters of the ‘great deep.’ That calmness which is found to exist at the bottom of the great seas could not be possible if the waters were alternately raised by the moon and pulled down by the earth.” -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (159-175)



“Even Sir Isaac Newton himself confessed that the explanation of the Moon's action on the Tides was the least satisfactory part of his theory of Gravitation. This theory asserts that the larger object attracts the smaller, and the mass of the Moon being reckoned as only one-eighth of that of the Earth, it follows that, if, by the presumed force of Gravitation, the Earth revolves round the Sun, much more, for the same reason, should the Moon do so likewise, instead of which that willful orb still continues to go round our world. Tides vary greatly in height, owing chiefly to the different configurations of the adjoining lands. At Chepstow it rises to 60 feet, at Portishead to 50, while at Dublin Bay it is but 1 2, and at Wexford only 5 feet … That the Earth itself has a slight tremulous motion may be seen in the movement of the spirit-level, even when fixed as steadily as possible, and that the sea has a fluctuation may be witnessed by the oscillation of an anchored ship in the calmest day of summer. By what means the tides are so regularly affected is at present only conjectured; possibly it may be by atmospheric pressure on the waters of the Great Deep, and perhaps even the Moon itself, as suggested by the late Dr. Rowbotham, may influence the atmosphere, increasing or diminishing its barometric pressure, and indirectly the rise and fall of the Earth in the waters.” -David Wardlaw Scott, “Terra Firma” (259-260)



“Bearing this fact in mind, that there exists a continual pressure of the atmosphere upon the Earth, and associating it with the fact that the Earth is a vast plane ‘stretched out upon the waters,’ and it will be seen that it must of necessity slightly fluctuate, or slowly rise and fall in the water. As by the action of the atmosphere the Earth is slowly depressed, the water moves towards the receding shore and produces the flood tide; and when by the reaction of the resisting oceanic medium the Earth gradually ascends the waters recede, and the ebb tide is produced. This is the general cause of tides. Whatever peculiarities are observable they may be traced to the reaction of channels, bays, headlands, and other local causes … That the Earth has a vibratory or tremulous motion, such as must necessarily belong to a floating and fluctuating structure, is abundantly proved by the experience of astronomers and surveyors. If a delicate spirit-level be firmly placed upon a rock or upon the most solid foundation which it is possible to construct, the very curious phenomenon will be observed of constant change in the position of the air-bubble. However carefully the ‘level’ may be adjusted, and the instrument protected from the atmosphere, the ‘bubble’ will not maintain its position many seconds together. A somewhat similar influence has been noticed in astronomical observatories, where instruments of the best construction and placed in the most approved positions cannot always be relied upon without occasional re-adjustment.” -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Earth Not a Globe, 2nd Edition” (108-110)



In the past several decades, NASA has shown video of astronauts, supposedly in low-Earth orbit, experiencing complete weightlessness, or “zero gravity,” how is this weightless effect achieved if gravity doesn’t exist? As it turns out, for the past several decades, NASA together with Boeing have been perfecting so-called “Zero G planes” and “Zero G maneuvers,” which are able to produce weightlessness at any altitude. Aboard modified Boeing 727’s specially trained pilots perform aerobatic maneuvers known as parabolas. Planes climb with a pitch angle of 45 degrees using engine thrust and elevator controls, then when maximum height is reached the craft is pointed downward at high speed. The period of weightlessness begins while ascending and lasts all the way up and over the parabola until reaching a downward pitch angle of 30 degrees, at which point the maneuver is repeated. Therefore all NASA’s footage of astronauts aboard “space shuttles,” or “the International Space Station” can be easily hoaxed and simulated in Earth-atmosphere aboard a Zero G plane. In fact, watching footage of Zero G plane flights alongside footage of NASA astronauts supposedly floating around their “space shuttles” and “space stations,” no observable difference can be seen between the two.



Astronomers claim to have measured all the planets distances, shapes, orbits, weights, relative positions, and times of revolution all based on the “law of gravitation” and without gravity, their entire cosmology folds under its own weight. Without gravity, people cannot stand upside-down on a ball-Earth! Without gravity, the Earth and planets cannot be revolving around the Sun! Without Newtonian gravitation, Einsteinian relativity, Copernican heliocentricity, and the entire Big Bang ball-Earth mythos cannot exist and falls to pieces. Gravity, both metaphorically and quite literally, just does not hold any water; not as a sound theory of cosmology, and not as a law supposedly responsible for holding in the world’s oceans!



“Man's experience tells him that he is not constructed like the flies that can live and move upon the ceiling of a room with as much safety as on the floor: - and since the modern theory of a planetary earth necessitates a crowd of theories to keep company with it, and one of them is that men are really bound to the earth by a force which fastens them to it ‘like needles round a spherical loadstone,’ a theory perfectly outrageous and opposed to all human experience, it follows that, unless we can trample upon common sense and ignore the teachings of experience, we have an evident proof that the Earth is not a globe … If we could - after our minds had once been opened to the light of Truth - conceive of a globular body on the surface of which human beings could exist, the power - no matter by what name it be called - that would hold them on would, then, necessarily, have to be so constraining and cogent that they could not live; the waters of the oceans would have to be as a solid mass, for motion would be impossible. But we not only exist, but live and move; and the water of the ocean skips and dances like a thing of life and beauty! This is a proof that the Earth is not a globe.” -William Carpenter, “100 Proofs the Earth is Not a Globe” (21-88)



“Nearly a hundred years ago Kepler had suggested that some kind of unknown force must hold the earth and the heavenly bodies in their places, and now Sir Isaac Newton, the greatest mathematician of his age, took up the idea and built the Law of Gravitation. The name is derived from the Latin word ‘gravis,’ which means ‘heavy,’ ‘ having weight,’ while the Law of Gravitation is defined as ‘That mutual action between masses of matter by virtue of which every such mass tends toward every other with a force varying directly as the product of the masses, and inversely as the square of their distances apart.’ Reduced to simplicity, gravitation is said to be ‘That which attracts every thing toward every other thing.’ That does not tell us much ; and yet the little it does tell us is not true; for a thoughtful observer knows very well that every thing is not attracted towards every other thing . . . The definition implies that it is a force; but it does not say so, for that phrase ‘mutual action ‘ is ambiguous, and not at all convincing.” -Gerrard Hickson, “Kings Dethroned” (14-15)



“The system of gravitation which makes the sun the moving centre of the Universe, the awkward principles of which are anything but certain since they apply to invisible circumstances so that they cannot be checked, is here replaced by the old geocentric system, universally accepted until the 17th century in view, of course, of its undisputable obviousness, and in which the earth, in a state of immobility and surrounded by the planets visibly moving round it including the sun, is at the centre of our Universe. These two facts which explain almost everything are firstly, the positive existence above the earth of a solid dome constituting the sky; and secondly, the non-material nature of the planets and constellations, which are not physical masses, but merely luminous manifestations without substance. These are the two circumstances which lead today to the fundamental transformation of astronomy.” -Gabrielle Henriet, “Heaven and Earth” (vi)

“The theory that motions are produced through material attraction is absurd. Attributing such a power to mere matter, which is passive by nature, is a supreme illusion. It is a lovely and easy theory to satisfy any man’s mind, but when the practical test comes, it falls all to pieces and becomes one of the most ridiculous theories to common sense and judgment.” -Professor Bernstein, “Letters to the British Association”

http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2016/01/gravity-does-not-exist.html

Admin
Admin

Posts : 524
Points : 2739
Reputation : 1637
Join date : 2015-12-30

View user profile http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by Animal Sanctuary on Mon Jan 25, 2016 6:30 pm

Outstanding post and video! This explains so much. Gravity is meaningless, an utterly useless word in terms of science and should be completely redefined.

So the density of water is affected by temperature. When water is heated, it expands, increasing in volume. The warmer the water, the more space it takes up, and the lower its density. The cooler the water the more dense. Because objects float better on a dense surface, they float better on salt water than fresh water. The denser the salt water, the easier it is for objects to float on top of it.



Water is weird though because when you cool it below 4°C, it starts to expand when you cool it further. So when water turns to ice, the molecules line up in that special way, and the ice actually takes up more room than the liquid.

This goes a long way toward explaining the ocean tides without using the ridiculous Moon and Sun gravity theory. There is no gravity. There is only the influence of hot and cold sources of light like the Sun and the Moon.

Animal Sanctuary

Posts : 50
Points : 608
Reputation : 148
Join date : 2016-01-12

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by iahawks on Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:44 pm

Two enthusiastic thumbs up!

iahawks

Posts : 10
Points : 451
Reputation : 28
Join date : 2016-01-10
Age : 39
Location : Oregon, USA

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by Thinkforyourself on Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:45 pm

Posted by schpankme 
Apr 11, 2015 19:12:26 GMT Admin said:
objects denser than the medium surrounding it will fall is not based on how dense, massive or voluminous the object is, 
but rather by the amount of resistance/friction, or lack thereof between it and the surrounding medium. 
This being why the bowling ball and feather fall at the same rate in the (almost) vacuum, but not under normal circumstances.



"the rate at which objects rise or fall depends on the resistance (or lack thereof) in the medium surrounding." ~ E. Dubay

Objects orientate themselves by seeking equilibrium based on their density, and the resistance within the surrounding medium.

examples:
the submarine can use compressed air to ascend in water.
the hot-air-ballon can use hot air to ascend in the air.
the airplane can use pressure difference across its flying surfaces to gain lift.

_________________
All about Shillaphobia

Shun the non-believers!

'Flat Earth Diva'

Supposed 'temper temper beanpole', 'snidy weasel' and 'clueless, cloying, sychophant.'

Apparently 'dangerous person'

Thinkforyourself
Admin

Posts : 2081
Points : 5437
Reputation : 2746
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 25
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by Thinkforyourself on Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:46 pm

Posted by planetruth on 04/14/2015
Is Sir Isaac Newton’s “Law of Gravity” Just One Great Big 500 Yr. Old Lie?
aplanetruth.info/2015/04/02/25-is-sir-isaac-newtons-law-of-gravity-just-one-great-big-lie/

_________________
All about Shillaphobia

Shun the non-believers!

'Flat Earth Diva'

Supposed 'temper temper beanpole', 'snidy weasel' and 'clueless, cloying, sychophant.'

Apparently 'dangerous person'

Thinkforyourself
Admin

Posts : 2081
Points : 5437
Reputation : 2746
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 25
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by Thinkforyourself on Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:46 pm

Posted by Admin on 04/18/2015
Gravity is Density on the Flat Earth:





_________________
All about Shillaphobia

Shun the non-believers!

'Flat Earth Diva'

Supposed 'temper temper beanpole', 'snidy weasel' and 'clueless, cloying, sychophant.'

Apparently 'dangerous person'

Thinkforyourself
Admin

Posts : 2081
Points : 5437
Reputation : 2746
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 25
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by Thinkforyourself on Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:48 pm

Posted by Admin on 05/20/2015

May 20, 2015 2:04:07 GMT drumhead138 said:
So we have gravity and density. His question to me was that any given object dropped from a high attitude would on a flat earth density model theoretically slow down as got got closer to earths mass. The oxygen level closer to earth would be more dense than say 20 miles up. Gravity seems to explain this, density does not.



Tell your educated ignorant friend that "on a flat earth model, a given object dropped from a high altitude," would not and does not "slow down as it gets closer to Earth." You are free-falling and accelerating as you go due to the laws of density, not because some magical force is "pulling" you down. And there is more oxygen closer to Earth than 20 miles up, how does he propose non-existent "gravity seems to explain this and density does not?" Oxygen is a denser gas than nitrogen and the other majority elements in our atmosflat. There is no "pulling force" pulling the oxygen down as your hypnotized friend imagines.

_________________
All about Shillaphobia

Shun the non-believers!

'Flat Earth Diva'

Supposed 'temper temper beanpole', 'snidy weasel' and 'clueless, cloying, sychophant.'

Apparently 'dangerous person'

Thinkforyourself
Admin

Posts : 2081
Points : 5437
Reputation : 2746
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 25
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by Thinkforyourself on Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:49 pm

Posted by theorist on 05/30/2015
Why doesn't a plastic ball fall quicker than a metal one?
Terminal velocity.

What is terminal velocity?
The outside surface of the object hitting the air.

The air doesn't care what the outside surface of an object is made of (even if it did care about its mass).

Gravity isn't required.

In fact if such a thing as gravity did exist, then objects probably would behave that way - where objects with more density get attracted to the Earth faster than objects of lesser density. What we observe happening in the real world is the opposite of what would happen if gravity was there. Objects don't speed up as they fall, they slow down - a lot!. Felix went at over 700 MPH when he jumped out, but lower down he was going under 250 MPH.

If gravity existed surely you'd accelerate towards the Earth - not slow down as you get lower?! 

Yes the air gets thicker, but I doubt it is thick enough to stop the Earth pulling you, the Earth is pulling you! You'd get pulled downwards at an accelerating rate, forced through the air, the Earth would force you down to it faster and faster like a magnet attracting another magnet just on a much larger scale. Same with walking, you'd feel a slight "peeling" effect having to peel your feet off the ground as you walked. Gravity never adds up.

_________________
All about Shillaphobia

Shun the non-believers!

'Flat Earth Diva'

Supposed 'temper temper beanpole', 'snidy weasel' and 'clueless, cloying, sychophant.'

Apparently 'dangerous person'

Thinkforyourself
Admin

Posts : 2081
Points : 5437
Reputation : 2746
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 25
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by Thinkforyourself on Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:50 pm

Posted by geno on 08/04/2015
please read this it should convince anyone with half a brain of the non existence of gravity guerami.pdf (85.63 KB)

_________________
All about Shillaphobia

Shun the non-believers!

'Flat Earth Diva'

Supposed 'temper temper beanpole', 'snidy weasel' and 'clueless, cloying, sychophant.'

Apparently 'dangerous person'

Thinkforyourself
Admin

Posts : 2081
Points : 5437
Reputation : 2746
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 25
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by Thinkforyourself on Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:50 pm

Posted by thinkforyourself on 08/04/2015

Aug 4, 2015 11:44:48 GMT geno said:
please read this it should convince anyone with half a brain of the non existence of gravity 


Interesting. Thanks for posting.  

As far as I am concerned, gravity was proven to be false when it was pointed out that it is not constant around the planet. 

_________________
All about Shillaphobia

Shun the non-believers!

'Flat Earth Diva'

Supposed 'temper temper beanpole', 'snidy weasel' and 'clueless, cloying, sychophant.'

Apparently 'dangerous person'

Thinkforyourself
Admin

Posts : 2081
Points : 5437
Reputation : 2746
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 25
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by Thinkforyourself on Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:51 pm

Posted by davidkay on 08/08/2015
xkcd.com/1489/

_________________
All about Shillaphobia

Shun the non-believers!

'Flat Earth Diva'

Supposed 'temper temper beanpole', 'snidy weasel' and 'clueless, cloying, sychophant.'

Apparently 'dangerous person'

Thinkforyourself
Admin

Posts : 2081
Points : 5437
Reputation : 2746
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 25
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by Thinkforyourself on Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:51 pm

Posted by csp on 08/20/2015

Aug 19, 2015 23:18:42 GMT revealeddreams said:
So if you are saying "it just is", is this another mystery that can never be answered like "what is conciousness?".



What makes something rise? it's lighter than it's surrounding
What makes something fall? its heavier than it's surrounding

There isn't any need for a force to explain this, the composition of matter takes care of all this for us.

_________________
All about Shillaphobia

Shun the non-believers!

'Flat Earth Diva'

Supposed 'temper temper beanpole', 'snidy weasel' and 'clueless, cloying, sychophant.'

Apparently 'dangerous person'

Thinkforyourself
Admin

Posts : 2081
Points : 5437
Reputation : 2746
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 25
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by Thinkforyourself on Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:52 pm

Posted by sargentsucks on 08/20/2015

Aug 20, 2015 2:01:38 GMT revealeddreams said:
Thanks for the reply LordRuger. Guess I just have to create a theory. Peace Bro.




That's the problem, we humans think EVERYTHING has to have an explanation. Just because there is a very real PHENOMENON of denser objects going down and less dense objects going up, doesn't mean it's only real if we can explain it with numbers.

Take electricity, does putting a certain pattern of magnets around a copper coil create a movement of electrons when applying a load? Yes. Is it a phenomenon? Yes. Do you tell an electrican they can't wire your house unless they explain that phenomenon? I hope not cause I would need to start a new business :-)

It's crazy how we can give someone 1,000 reasons the earth isn't round but if someone even thinks they have JUST ONE reason the earth isn't flat then they will hold on to it like a child with a passy and scream bloody murder when someone tries to remove it and feed that baby some substance

_________________
All about Shillaphobia

Shun the non-believers!

'Flat Earth Diva'

Supposed 'temper temper beanpole', 'snidy weasel' and 'clueless, cloying, sychophant.'

Apparently 'dangerous person'

Thinkforyourself
Admin

Posts : 2081
Points : 5437
Reputation : 2746
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 25
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by Thinkforyourself on Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:53 pm

Posted by natavism on 09/09/2015
This is one of my favorite subtopics of the entire flat Earth conspiracy.  I've recently been reading The Rosicrucian Enlightenment by Frances A. Yates, and I will say that it's spectacular.  It is a truly academic work about the founding of the Rosicrucians, their history, and their enterprises - this includes the founding of Freemasonry.  The gist is actually presented most clearly in the popular movie Fight Club, with John Dee being represented by Edward Norton, and the imaginary Brad Pitt (aka Tyler Durden - tyler being a masonic term) representing Christian Rosencreutz, a fictional persona used to found Project Mayhem, or Freemasonry.

Anyway, chapter XIV is titled ELIAS ASHMOLE AND THE THE DEE TRADITION: Isaac Newton and Rosicrucian Alchemy.  It is made very clear that Newton was an occultist, and I'm sure that this had a lot to do with his success and his formation of the Theory of Universal Gravitation - the entire heliocentric model is an occultic form of Sun worship.

I'm working on material for a Gravity Debunked megathread and I was hoping to find other academically minded sources to parse through.  My current list of topics will include Newton's history, the ludicrous Cavendish experiments, and the circular reasoning of gravity itself - which must assume the Earth's mass in order to find the force in order to measure the Earth's mass.  I'd also like to get into density to an extent but would like to focus mostly on how Universal Gravitation is bullshit.  I'm also looking for a copy of Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica (preferably in English, but I do have some Latin in my background and am willing to work with it if that's all that's available) if anyone could help direct me to one I'd be grateful.

Please don't be afraid to throw any information my way - if I end up writing a book then so be it - and I'm happy to credit everyone that contributes.

Thanks!

_________________
All about Shillaphobia

Shun the non-believers!

'Flat Earth Diva'

Supposed 'temper temper beanpole', 'snidy weasel' and 'clueless, cloying, sychophant.'

Apparently 'dangerous person'

Thinkforyourself
Admin

Posts : 2081
Points : 5437
Reputation : 2746
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 25
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by Thinkforyourself on Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:53 pm

Posted by ricaius on 09/09/2015

Sept 9, 2015 0:41:34 GMT natavism said:
  I'm also looking for a copy of Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica (preferably in English, but I do have some Latin in my background and am willing to work with it if that's all that's available) if anyone could help direct me to one I'd be grateful.



I've found two different translations:


First American Edition (1846)


Revision (1934)

_________________
All about Shillaphobia

Shun the non-believers!

'Flat Earth Diva'

Supposed 'temper temper beanpole', 'snidy weasel' and 'clueless, cloying, sychophant.'

Apparently 'dangerous person'

Thinkforyourself
Admin

Posts : 2081
Points : 5437
Reputation : 2746
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 25
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by Thinkforyourself on Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:53 pm

Posted by damnice on 09/11/2015
Just a philosophical thought I had the other day: If gravity is an eternal invisible force causing action/motion doesn't it completely violate the Conservation of Energy law in physics?

From wikipedia:
"In physics, the law of conservation of energy states that the total energy of an isolated system remains constant-it is said to be conserved over time. Energy can be neither created nor be destroyed, but it transforms from one form to another, for instance chemical energy can be converted to kinetic energy in the explosion of a stick of dynamite. A consequence of the law of conservation of energy is that a perpetual motion machine of the first kind cannot exist. That is to say, no system without an external energy supply can deliver an unlimited amount of energy to its surroundings."

Yet perpetual motion machines are how "science" explains everything in the universe from us sticking to the Earth to the Moon revolving around Earth, to the Earth revolving around the Sun, to our solar system revolving around the Milky Way, and on and on.

If I jump into the air it costs energy, I put energy into it. Gravity pulling me back costs the Earth nothing? How about all those satellites that are supposedly suspended in space. That is not thought of as a man-made perpetual motion machine?

Gravity is taught as a force, all forces cost energy, no energy is expended to enforce gravity, therefore there is no such thing as gravity. Got it?

_________________
All about Shillaphobia

Shun the non-believers!

'Flat Earth Diva'

Supposed 'temper temper beanpole', 'snidy weasel' and 'clueless, cloying, sychophant.'

Apparently 'dangerous person'

Thinkforyourself
Admin

Posts : 2081
Points : 5437
Reputation : 2746
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 25
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by Thinkforyourself on Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:54 pm

Posted by thinkforyourself on 09/11/2015

Sept 10, 2015 22:08:12 GMT damnice said:
Just a philosophical thought I had the other day: If gravity is an eternal invisible force causing action/motion doesn't it completely violate the Conservation of Energy law in physics?





Yes, that is an interesting point. Thank you for pointing out yet another contradiction resulting from the magic fairy nonsense that is 'Gravity'.

_________________
All about Shillaphobia

Shun the non-believers!

'Flat Earth Diva'

Supposed 'temper temper beanpole', 'snidy weasel' and 'clueless, cloying, sychophant.'

Apparently 'dangerous person'

Thinkforyourself
Admin

Posts : 2081
Points : 5437
Reputation : 2746
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 25
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by Thinkforyourself on Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:55 pm

Posted by susie on 10/02/2015






RIP gravity and relativity.

_________________
All about Shillaphobia

Shun the non-believers!

'Flat Earth Diva'

Supposed 'temper temper beanpole', 'snidy weasel' and 'clueless, cloying, sychophant.'

Apparently 'dangerous person'

Thinkforyourself
Admin

Posts : 2081
Points : 5437
Reputation : 2746
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 25
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by Thinkforyourself on Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:55 pm

Posted by aleksandar2015 on 10/11/2015
Where is gravity? Thay say gravity holds atmosphere. Why not smoke from factory? Maybe gravity is on vacation?

_________________
All about Shillaphobia

Shun the non-believers!

'Flat Earth Diva'

Supposed 'temper temper beanpole', 'snidy weasel' and 'clueless, cloying, sychophant.'

Apparently 'dangerous person'

Thinkforyourself
Admin

Posts : 2081
Points : 5437
Reputation : 2746
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 25
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by Thinkforyourself on Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:56 pm

Posted by schpankme on 10/11/2015

Oct 10, 2015 14:38:20 GMT aleksandar2015 said:
Where is gravity?





Definition of Theory

"A theory is more general and  better  verified  than  a  hypothesis. (See  Big Bang theory,  Evolution,  and Relativity)"
~ Dictionary.com

"The meaning of “theory” in science is different than the meaning of “theory” in everyday conversation."
~ The National Center for Science Education (NCSE)


The people have been taught that, Scientific Theory is not Pretend, it's an explanation of the natural world.  They  are 
further indoctrinated to believe, through the Science books and the Advanced education they purchase, that all things 
taught are proven with evidence.

This Theory based Religion, called Science Worship, is played out in classrooms,  and  through  the  media,  daily.  It
purports to be predominantly Atheist. Take notice, how this worship closely parallels Theism.  "In  the  beginning  was 
that Word, and that Word was with God, and that Word was God."

When discussing such matters as Outer Space with a religious  practitioner,  you  might  ask  the  question,  "has  the 
vacuum of Outer Space been proven, and how does the vacuum of space connect to the Earth's non-vacuum?" 

To which the answer might be, "Study astronomy, the word is in the book,  and  the  word  says, that  the  Vacuum  is 
space void of matter. This is a scientific fact, made possible by the word, and that word is Gravity."

Say the word and the god of science makes all things possible.

_________________
All about Shillaphobia

Shun the non-believers!

'Flat Earth Diva'

Supposed 'temper temper beanpole', 'snidy weasel' and 'clueless, cloying, sychophant.'

Apparently 'dangerous person'

Thinkforyourself
Admin

Posts : 2081
Points : 5437
Reputation : 2746
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 25
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by Admin on Sat Feb 13, 2016 6:25 am



I love how I release a video/article exposing gravity theory, then the next week exposing Einstein's relativity theory, and then the week after that NASA and the entire mainstream media says "Einstein Was Right, We've Proven Gravity!"  LOL.  See the power shift taking place?  Some random dude from a studio apartment in Thailand is writing the script and "the powers that be" have to react using their entire apparatus to attempt damage control.  This shows how much power we have.  I hope everyone sees this power shift taking place and helps tip the scales by working a little bit every day (as I do) towards bringing this flat Earth truth out on a mass scale. We are at a critical juncture/window of time where we can expose this greatest deception in human history if we continue to explode this information as far and wide as possible.

Admin
Admin

Posts : 524
Points : 2739
Reputation : 1637
Join date : 2015-12-30

View user profile http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by Paranoid Gramdroid on Sat Feb 13, 2016 11:23 am

Yeah, this is all very convenient. The BBC alone have released no less than 7 videos on this "discovery". I haven't seen any evidence though. Science is blind faith like any religion.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-35554081

Paranoid Gramdroid

Posts : 10
Points : 457
Reputation : 37
Join date : 2016-01-13
Age : 38
Location : Lincolnshire, UK

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by QuantumPineapple on Sat Feb 13, 2016 7:44 pm

Admin wrote:

I love how I release a video/article exposing gravity theory, then the next week exposing Einstein's relativity theory, and then the week after that NASA and the entire mainstream media says "Einstein Was Right, We've Proven Gravity!"  LOL.  See the power shift taking place?  Some random dude from a studio apartment in Thailand is writing the script and "the powers that be" have to react using their entire apparatus to attempt damage control.  This shows how much power we have.  I hope everyone sees this power shift taking place and helps tip the scales by working a little bit every day (as I do) towards bringing this flat Earth truth out on a mass scale.  We are at a critical juncture/window of time where we can expose this greatest deception in human history if we continue to explode this information as far and wide as possible.

It's so blatantly obvious they are just doing damage control now. I laughed my ASS off when I saw people linking "the big, scientific discovery of the century!" on social media. What a joke.

NOW people all over YouTube are "calling you out" Eric, because "Science proves gravity waves, so Eric is wrong!" What bullshit! We are absolutely at a tipping point.

Keep up the good work, Eric. I feel like I'm watching classic WWF and you're interrupting Vince McMahon's script. Keep going!

QuantumPineapple

Posts : 5
Points : 420
Reputation : 25
Join date : 2016-02-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by Animal Sanctuary on Sun Feb 14, 2016 2:53 am

Admin wrote:

I love how I release a video/article exposing gravity theory, then the next week exposing Einstein's relativity theory, and then the week after that NASA and the entire mainstream media says "Einstein Was Right, We've Proven Gravity!"  LOL.  See the power shift taking place?  Some random dude from a studio apartment in Thailand is writing the script and "the powers that be" have to react using their entire apparatus to attempt damage control.  This shows how much power we have.  I hope everyone sees this power shift taking place and helps tip the scales by working a little bit every day (as I do) towards bringing this flat Earth truth out on a mass scale.  We are at a critical juncture/window of time where we can expose this greatest deception in human history if we continue to explode this information as far and wide as possible.

Seriously two weeks after Eric posts his videos we get this. I think you wounded them. Keep going!


Animal Sanctuary

Posts : 50
Points : 608
Reputation : 148
Join date : 2016-01-12

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by George Tirebiter on Sat Feb 27, 2016 7:05 pm

Gravity Waves of Propaganda

"I have to say this for them: these people never quit.   If they get caught in one spectacular lie, they just wait a year and a half and come back with another one.   I guess they are relying on the short memory of most people, but when I heard this announcement of gravity waves today, I said to myself, “Didn't they already do this?  Didn't we get  a huge announcement of gravity waves in early 2014?  Didn't Alan Guth win a million-dollar prize for that?”   In fact, he did.   He—along with Alexei Starobinsky and Andre Linde—won the Kavli Prize in July 2014, so 3 million was allegedly paid out.   According to mainstream stories at the time, the proximate cause of these prizes was the discovery of gravity waves by   BICEP2   on   March   17,   2014.   Of   course   all   those   stories   from   2014   have   been   rewritten, downplaying  the  claim  of  gravity  waves   and  playing  up  the   alleged  discovery  of  cosmic  inflation. However, within a few months (after the publication of my crushing paper of March 18) they had to admit   this   announcement   was   not   only   horribly   premature,   it   was   flat   wrong.    To   save   face,   they claimed that dust in the Milky Way exactly mimicked the signature of gravity waves.   This despite having   claimed   in   the   peer-reviewed   papers   in   March   that   they   had   ruled   that out   and   claiming   a positive detection at sigma 7. A sigma of 7 indicated that BICEP2 only admitted a .0000000001% chance they were wrong.  That's 1 in 10 billion.  Funny, then, that they had to admit they were wrong only a couple of months later.   Strange how it always works out that way, whether they are claiming faster-than-light detections, dark matter detections, or whatever."(1)

"..... I can already tell the whole thing is manufactured from nothing.  The first clue is   that   the   paper   is   once   again   hiding   behind   1,000   authors.   We   saw   the   same   thing   with   the manufactured Higgs detection, which I believe had even more authors than that.  The truth doesn't need such a large bandwagon."(1)

"But  I  knew  even before  the  first  clue, since  I  know  gravity waves   don't  exist.    I assume  all  these “physicists” know it, too, but the truth doesn't butter anyone's bread.  Einstein knew it.  They admit in the articles that Einstein twice told the world gravity waves don't exist.  They tell you he flip-flopped both   times,   saying   they did exist,   but   they   don't   tell   you   why   Einstein   flipped.     He   flipped   under pressure from the mainstream, who didn't like him telling the truth.   We see this all the time in all subjects: someone blows the whistle on some big project, the spooks visit him and twist his arm, and suddenly he changes his mind.  This is what happened with Einstein."(1)

Cites-(Read More)
(1) http://milesmathis.com/liego.pdf

George Tirebiter

Posts : 55
Points : 579
Reputation : 132
Join date : 2016-02-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Gravity Does Not Exist!

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum