CoronaVirus and Forced Vaccination Manipulation

German Covid conspiracy theorist Attila Hildmann is blocked on Telegram

The ban of all "Corona"- and vaccine skeptical information on Youtube and Facebook was the beginning, this is the next step and the final step will be the imprisonment of all government critics.

I am a subscriber of Hildmann's Telegram channel. Now I can only view it on my Linux Desktop app, on iPhone it's gone. For Android-based phones you can install the original Telegram app to avaoid censorship, but on iPhone it's not possible. At least not to my knowledge. If anyone knows a way, please share.

Hildmann didn't do that before or after, but in one voice message he said that "they lie to us about everything, even the shape of the earth".

Hey Attila, wenn Du hier mitliest: Mach weiter so, bleib wie Du bist!

Influenza Stakeholders Meeting 1/22/2019

Follow the $$

As this tread has died out. Here is a interesting video I recently watched about this topic: https://rumble.com/vj25zh-covid-19-is-caused-by-graphene-oxide-introduced-by-several-ways.html

Dr. David Martin gives a deposition to Reiner Fuellmich after combing thousands of patents since the early 2000's for the SarsCov spike protein injections. Names all of the companies, Universities and major players involved, DARPA and government connections, etc.

You cannot patent something that is found in nature, so they created In-sillico make-believe computer generated genome sequences that they claim are Coronaviruses, Patent those sequences, since they are man made, not natural, which allows them to patent the PCR test sequence to detect their made up sequence, which allows them to patent the jab, which their synthetic lab made proteins to "treat" the make believe patented Coronavirus detected by the patented test to detect the make believe virus, and then they poison you.

The "outbreaks" are just PCR test fraud looking for made up patented sequences using the name Coronavirus, SARS, etc. They only exist on paper for patent reasons, the real bioweapon is in the jab, not an actual virus going around the public.

THE CALM BEFORE THE STORM - HOW MANY WILL GET MURDERED BY THE BS19 POISONS.
THE GIFT THAT KEEPS ON GIVING
Medical battery is where a doctor or medical professional causes a harmful or offensive touching to their patients

QUESTION EVERYTHING DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH
Use the information found in this video as a starting point for conducting your own research and conduct your own due diligence before making any significant decisions be it investment or otherwise.
(RedPillWorld) will always try to obtain the best content possible for all subscribers

https://www.bitchute.com/video/3JZwlzvqv1q7/

Once they involve the military to aid them, we are indeed heading into a dangerous & serious era.

I hope that KARMA is real & does exist, so all those who are complicit (inc those at the top) in genocide etc., will be held accountable for their crimes.

How to remove Graphene Oxide found in Covid Vaccines-electromagnetic-fields-blood-clots-severe-covid-symptoms-how-to-remove-graphene-oxide-from-the-body
ON THE CONNECTION BETWEEN GRAPHENE OXIDE FOUND IN “COVID VACCINES”, ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS, BLOOD CLOTS & SEVERE “COVID” SYMPTOMS  | HOW TO REMOVE GRAPHENE OXIDE FROM THE BODY

Find out how La Quinta Columna discovered the connection between graphene oxide and electromagnetic fields
by Orwellito, Orwell City
July 5, 2021



Many are already aware of the work that the team of Spanish researchers that make up La Quinta Columna have been doing.

They are the ones who have had the courage to get a vial of vaccination and send it for analysis to a renowned Spanish university through Prof. Dr. Pablo Campra Madrid, who is compiling and officializing the results in a report that promises to be more conclusive than the preliminary one he prepared for the general public early last week.

However, there are people who still do not know about La Quinta Columna. If you are one of those, then the following video is especially for you. Orwell City has transcribed, translated, subtitled and edited the video to keep its message going around the world.

Ricardo Delgado, founder and director of La Quinta Columna participated with his research partner, Dr. José Luis Sevillano, in the XXVIII Humanitarian Conference organized by the World Coalition for Health and Life (COMUSAV) and the United Nations Council for Life and Truth (CONUVIVE).



Video available at Orwellito Rumble and BitChute channels.

Transcript:

“La Quinta Columna wants to make it clear from the beginning that we have the obligation, we have the obligation to be united because we are in the same battle to give the best of ourselves, because what is at stake is precisely the future of all species. Depending on the strength and momentum that we put into this task will depend on the future of all humanity. We are right now at the turning point from which things can begin to change, and in this sense La Quinta Columna is going to summarize what has been the result of its research during this year and a half, but above all and especially during the last two months. And why during the last two months? I always remember Dr. José Luis Sevillano’s words since the two of us work as a binomial and he has been accompanying me in La Quinta Columna. He said that when the vaccination started we were going to really see what he was doing and what material could be in there.

Then we realized that there was a new phenomenon that for a while we tried to deny, although today it’s evident because of the millions of videos on social media, and we have been able to even measure it with devices: teslameters, magnetometers, etc. I am referring to the magnetic or pseudo-magnetic phenomenon that people acquire after inoculation. A magnetic phenomenon on the one hand, but also one that turns inoculated people into superconductors and also stores energy that can be measured with a multimeter in certain parts, such as the forehead, for example.

So from there we started to look for what kind of materials or, better said, nanomaterials can cause those kinds of properties inside the body and we came up with some of the candidates. One of them initially was graphene. Graphene inside the body acquires magnetic properties and is a superconductor. It serves for energy storage and condensation and was a strong candidate. Without yet having any knowledge of what was inside the vial, we realized that the industry or rather the stock market of the graphene industry had high uptrend peaks just as the COVID-19 vaccination campaign was starting at the beginning of the year, late December and early January. But also, quite curious, during the flu vaccination campaign.

When we have seen the possibilities that graphene has, or rather, that graphene oxide nanoparticles have inside the body when it comes to neuromodulation and when it comes to picking up neuronal electrophysiological effects for brain mapping, we have realized the possibility that graphene is being injected. Can graphene be injected? Yes. Graphene can be injected. And, in fact, some scientific papers have already raised the possibility that it could be used as a nanoadjuvant in vaccines. With that hypothesis of suspicion, we did what anyone could have done and what I also recommend that you can do if you have access to a vial.

We had access to a sealed vial from Pfizer, and by means of a request for services to a university, specifically in my name, it was sent for an analysis of the vial, where we were looking for the material in question: graphene. After some time of investigation by Dr. Pablo Campra Madrid, Doctor in Chemical Sciences, Bachelor in Biological Sciences and member of the University of Almeria, we obtained this preliminary report where we are told that there is indeed solid evidence of graphene oxide in the sample and that it is also the main component of what they wrongly called a vaccine.

From here and with this solid evidence, which will be further complemented with other spectroscopy techniques that can be done. Those that have been used are transmission electron microscopy; EMF techniques, also, optical microscopy; and ultraviolet radiation spectroscopy, which coincide with the peak wavelength of graphene oxide. From here we began to study the toxicity or cytotoxicity that graphene oxide has on the body.

Pay attention to this finding: Graphene oxide inside the body causes thrombogenicity, thrombi. Graphene oxide inside the body causes blood clotting. Graphene oxide inside the body causes post inflammatory syndrome or systemic or multi-organ inflammations. Graphene oxide inside the body when it is above the levels of glutathione —which is the body’s natural reserve of antioxidants—, causes alteration of the immune system, collapse of the immune system and cytokine storm. Inhaled graphene oxide spreads evenly throughout the alveolar tract and causes bilateral pneumonias. Inhaled graphene oxide causes inflammation of the mucous membranes and thus loss of taste and smell, possible loss of taste and smell: anosmia.

In short, graphene oxide behaves exactly like the supposed SARS-CoV-2 of the official version, generating the same symptomatology of severe COVID-19. When installed at the neuronal level, it causes neurodegeneration or, in other words, neurological COVID-19.

So, from here we started to see what possible compounds, drugs and treatments could degrade graphene oxide. And look what we found: N-acetylcysteine or glutathione administered degrade it. Because what glutathione does is counteract free radicals and oxidants, all the toxins that can enter the body.

And we discovered that there were about 300 clinical studies where certain hospitals and certain universities were using N-acetylcysteine with incredible results. For example,100 patients with saturation levels below 50% practically dead —bluntly speaking—, with bilateral pneumonias, within an hour of intravenous glutathione or N-acetylcysteine administration they made it. They were taken off ventilators and everything.

We now fully understand why those treatments worked: because they addressed all the symptoms of the disease supposedly caused by SARS-CoV-2. Given that to date there is no scientific evidence of an actual sequencing and isolation of SARS-CoV-2, we suspect with many credible indications that COVID-19 disease is actually the side effect of the introduction of graphene oxide into the body by different ways.

And I say ‘different ways’ because, although they were withdrawn at the time, masks containing graphene oxide nanoparticles have been introduced and are still being marketed. These masks have been introduced and are still being marketed by companies such as Nanografi, so we have masks with graphene oxide, but also graphene oxide nanoparticles introduced in PCR tests; graphene oxide is also present in antigen tests; hydrogels also contain graphene oxide nanoparticles; intranasal vaccines also, since graphene oxide in aerosols is more potent, as is the supposed SARS-CoV-2. Intranasal vaccines are also prepared, for example, by Turkey. They are made by Nanografi for COVID-19 and influenza.

We know that, naturally, graphene oxide is eliminated by the levels of glutathione in the body, and that is why we suspect that they propose a second, third and even fourth dose every so often: so that you have your considerable dose of graphene oxide. In short, we are talking about the simultaneous and gradual mass poisoning of the entire world population.

Think, if the preliminary report of a professor of a public university in Almeria —and I know that the same study is being done in other European and some Latin American universities—, if it determined that there is graphene oxide in the vials, how is it possible that graphene oxide is injected if the masks were removed because it caused pulmonary affections because of this nanoparticle? We are talking about a crime against humanity with the complicity of governments or at least their participation.

When we study glutathione, we realize that it begins to fall from the age of 30 onwards, but above all it falls considerably from the age of 65 onwards. In fact, COVID-19 takes a heavier toll on older people, apart from those who are immunocompromised and have other pathologies. When we study glutathione, we realize that children have high glutathione reserves because of their youth, and the COVID-19 disease itself hardly has an impact on children. Similarly, glutathione is especially low in the obese population and we realize that it is precisely the obese who are most affected by COVID-19. We realize that glutathione is related to vitamin D. Low levels of glutathione are low levels of vitamin D and it is precisely patients with COVID-19 who have low levels of vitamin D. We realize that athletes have high levels of glutathione endogenously, which are secreted with intense exercise, and precisely athletes are hardly affected by COVID-19.

Everything that we have subsequently studied only further increases and corroborates the hypothesis that the supposed SARS-CoV-2 of the official version is precisely the graphene oxide. And that all the elements of protection, of supposed protection, that we have been given: masks, PCR tests, swabs, antigen tests and vaccine —the wrongly called vaccine— are precisely all those elements that will potentially cause the disease to develop in the future.

(5G INVOLVEMENT IN VACCINES. EVIDENCE OF 5G HARM!!)
And why do I say ‘in the future’? When we studied the electromagnetic phenomenon we realized that graphene oxide has what is called an ‘electronic absorption band’. The electronic excitation, its magnetic resonance is precisely in the third bandwidth of the 5G technology, the one that is being tendered right now and that, remember, has been with us throughout the pandemic.

As absolutely everything started we have had three ‘nets’: The first is that 5G terrestrial antenna that never stopped being placed —because only the antenna operators worked— and that curiously 8 out of 10 of these antennas are placed near geriatrics and nursing homes, in their immediate vicinity, which has been precisely the most affected population. Another inner net: precisely of graphene, according to the preliminary report of the vial of this university. And an external net, which is the one used by space satellites to supposedly provide 5G coverage.


Incredibly, we are narrating a science fiction movie, but believe me, today nanoscience, neuroscience and biotechnology have advanced tremendously.We have only made an approximation in the realm of science and behind the back of civil society. Can a person be controlled or neurocontrolled remotely wirelessly? Yes, it can be done and it is probably being done in a disguised way, and that may explain some of the anomalous behavioral behavior of the population, especially those who have been inoculated or who have received doses of graphene oxide by different ways. As I say, I know I am drawing a science fiction movie, but at the heights we are at it can be difficult to really believe in something. In this sense we say that COVID-19 is only the collateral effect of the introduction of that nanocomposite by different ways, and we suspect that it was introduced in the 2019 anti-flu campaign.

As I was saying, graphene oxide has an absorption band from which it oxidizes much more quicklywhen a small button is turned on to provide 5G coverage or to perform a technological test. Do you think it is a coincidence that Wuhan —where the pangolin and bat soup came from as distraction elements— is the first city in the world with the 5G technology trial at the end of November 2019 and that all previous flu vaccination probably with graphene oxide started from there? When excited, graphene oxide multiplies frequencies. With a minimum signal, it oxidizes much faster and breaks the balance between glutathione levels and the toxicity of the organism, generating bilateral pneumonia, altering the behavior of the immune system, which cannot cope as soon as the neutrophils try to phagocytize it as if it were a pathogen, as if it were SARS-CoV-2.

We shared an article today, if I can screen share I’m going to try to do that, can you let me know if you’re seeing it on screen? Well, let’s see: ‘Graphene oxide is detected in the body by specialized cells (neutrophils) of the immune system.’ Just as if it were a pathogen. The body, the immune system, doesn’t care if there is a biological agent because this never behaved like a biological agent. There are incubation periods if biological. It is not possible that in residences in our country in Spain, such as Matacaz in Barcelona, half of a residence died in 4 hours. If it is a biological agent, it does not cause bilateral pneumonia, but rather asymmetric pneumonia: they usually enter through the right lung due to symmetry. But half of a residence that had previously been vaccinated against influenza could not die.


Source: Graphene Info
We observed that the higher the flu vaccination, the higher the mortality of COVID-19, and logically we saw a relationship. The other relationship was with electromagnetic fields. What we did not know is that there was a marking on each of these people to make them a target population for the electromagnetic focus. A lethal weapon that now makes people magnetic and logically you will understand that if they interact with those radiation sources at a specific frequency and quality, they cause in oxidation, they break the redox balance of the oxidative biomarkers of the organism, causing the COVID-19 disease.

We know this crystal clear, and we have all the scientific articles that prove it. One of them is this one:

‘Researchers at Karolinska Institutet, the University of Manchester and Chalmers University of Technology have shown that the human immune system handles graphene oxide in a manner similar to pathogens, possibly leading to safer biomedical applications in the future.’

What you are seeing here is graphene oxide being attacked by neutrophils which are, let’s say, cells of the immune system that try to phagocytize it, try to engulf it: to coagulate it. That’s why graphene oxide generates clots and thrombi.

‘Graphene oxide is currently being studied for use in various drug delivery methods and other medical and non-medical applications. However, it is of critical importance to understand how these materials interact with the body. The study shows that neutrophils, the most common type of white blood cell specialized in combating infections, —just like a pathogen— release so-called neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs, the most common type of white blood cells) when encountering GO (graphene oxide). NETs are made up of a “spider-web” of DNA decorated with proteins that help neutrophils to destroy microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi. The researchers found that GO causes specific changes in the lipid composition of the cell membrane of neutrophils leading to the release of NETs. They could also show that antioxidant treatment —such as with NAC and glutathione— reversed this process.’

That is why treatments with glutathione have worked, and that is why treatments with N-acetylcysteine, which is a precursor of glutathione. Because they work providing the army with antioxidant reserves to deal with a toxic substance, a poisoning, that has been introduced into the body by different ways.

‘In a companion study published in Nanoscale, it was shown that GO is degraded in NETs, much like bacteria and other pathogens.’

Taken together, these studies show that GO can be trapped and degraded in NETs just like pathogens. I want to tell you that we have published in our website at least 70 studies that reflect everything we are saying and manifesting here.

On the other hand, I have been asked about the efficacy of chlorine dioxide. That goes another way. What it does is to oxygenate the cell, it prepares it so that it is not easily destroyed by this toxicant. What glutathione would do is to provide the army with more numbers of soldiers in terms of glutathione to deal with toxins. What we have found, as I say, is that most of the treatments that have been with N-acetylcysteine or glutathione and even with other antioxidants such as astaxanthin, which is a powerful antioxidant, have been very favorable treatments for the patients.

And also, curiously and suspiciously, found that these health institutions are literally governed by evil; it is a psychopathy without previous history: we had never seen the history of such psychopathy.

By June 17 that the FDA tried to stop the marketing of N-acetylcysteine after it had been used for 57 years as a normal and ordinary mococcolytic. It was a very suspicious thing to do, wasn’t it? So this is basically my exposition. Any doubts that you may have about the studies that we have carried out at La Quinta Columna, well, there is simply something that is very conclusive, and that is the preliminary report of a renowned professor of a public university here in Spain. We are very close to providing complementary evidence to give more strength to this report in which we are already told that there is solid and proven evidence that there is graphene oxide in the sample that we sent.

Simply, for Colonel Tamayo and Judge Giorgianni: regardless of the fact that we obviously think that SARS-CoV-2 is precisely graphene oxide —and we can prove it— or at least it behaves exactly and exhaustively the same, how is it possible that graphene oxide is injected through the vials? How is it possible if the masks were really withdrawn because they caused pulmonary affections due to toxicity? What are we talking about, gentlemen?

Here I have tried to make the exposition as synthesized as possible so any doubt that may be generated by the manifestation that I have given here can be clarified throughout the time left we have.”

—Ricardo Delgado.

Ok kids, here is the EVIDENCE that 5G IS HARMFUL!!

susie wrote:And an external net, which is the one used by space satellites to supposedly provide 5G coverage.


Incredibly, we are narrating a science fiction movie, but believe me, today nanoscience, neuroscience and biotechnology have advanced tremendously.We have only made an approximation in the realm of science and behind the back of civil society. Can a person be controlled or neurocontrolled remotely wirelessly? Yes, it can be done and it is probably being done in a disguised way, and that may explain some of the anomalous behavioral behavior of the population, especially those who have been inoculated or who have received doses of graphene oxide by different ways. As I say, I know I am drawing a science fiction movie, but at the heights we are at it can be difficult to really believe in something. In this sense we say that COVID-19 is only the collateral effect of the introduction of that nanocomposite by different ways, and we suspect that it was introduced in the 2019 anti-flu campaign.

As I was saying, graphene oxide has an absorption band from which it oxidizes much more quicklywhen a small button is turned on to provide 5G coverage or to perform a technological test. Do you think it is a coincidence that Wuhan —where the pangolin and bat soup came from as distraction elements— is the first city in the world with the 5G technology trial at the end of November 2019 and that all previous flu vaccination probably with graphene oxide started from there?

I've been waiting for someone on this forum to fall for the "graphene oxide" magnification, nano lies.
You claim this is the evidence that 5G is harmful, so why are you mentioning fake "space satellites" in conjunction with 5g if its real?

"Incredibly, we are narrating a science fiction movie, but believe me, today nanoscience, neuroscience and biotechnology have advanced tremendously."
you are narrating a science fiction movie, and no, i won't beLIEve you.

"Can a person be controlled or neurocontrolled remotely wirelessly? Yes, it can be done and it is probably being done in a disguised way"
Doesn't provide evidence proving this, but "probably" counts as proof right?

"As I say, I know I am drawing a science fiction movie, but at the heights we are at it can be difficult to really believe in something."
I know i'm spewing unproven sci-fi crap but please beLIEve!

"As I was saying, graphene oxide has an absorption band from which it oxidizes much more quicklywhen a small button is turned on to provide 5G coverage or to perform a technological test."
Where's the proof proving this statement? oh right, gotta beLIEve

"Do you think it is a coincidence that Wuhan —where the pangolin and bat soup came from as distraction elements— is the first city in the world with the 5G technology trial at the end of November 2019 and that all previous flu vaccination probably with graphene oxide started from there?"
it probably has graphene oxide, so guess work is now proof?

It's really quite simple, if 5g is harmful, prove it using experiments anyone and everyone can do.
If people are being magnetized why does sticking a magnet to the vaccinated not do anything for me when i tested it? I heard people say that it only works on some people, how convenient, can't test to see if people are being magnetized myself, guess i gotta beLIEve some videos i've seen on the internet.

Notice how 5g, microchips, nanoparticles, and people being "magnetized" are being used by the brainwashed to make fun of "anti vaxxers"
Now whenever i try and tell people about vaccines being unknown injections coming from strangers and how it doesn't even make sense to trust strangers to inject you with unknown substances, i have to deal with hive minded people marginalizing and strawmanning my position by claiming that i beLIEve vaccines contain microchips, nanoparticles, people being magnetized, and 5g controlling people.
Then look who's promoting this sci-fi nonsense, alex jones, david icke, and every controlled opp agent alive.

5G, microchips and nanoparticles supposedly being in vaccines, people supposedly being magnetized by "graphene oxide" in vaccines, these claims are controlled opposition lies meant to get people to write off anyone against vaccines as a crazy conspiracy theorist, which is what controlled opposition is meant to do

Russian Blue Cat wrote:

susie wrote:And an external net, which is the one used by space satellites to supposedly provide 5G coverage.


Incredibly, we are narrating a science fiction movie, but believe me, today nanoscience, neuroscience and biotechnology have advanced tremendously.We have only made an approximation in the realm of science and behind the back of civil society. Can a person be controlled or neurocontrolled remotely wirelessly? Yes, it can be done and it is probably being done in a disguised way, and that may explain some of the anomalous behavioral behavior of the population, especially those who have been inoculated or who have received doses of graphene oxide by different ways. As I say, I know I am drawing a science fiction movie, but at the heights we are at it can be difficult to really believe in something. In this sense we say that COVID-19 is only the collateral effect of the introduction of that nanocomposite by different ways, and we suspect that it was introduced in the 2019 anti-flu campaign.

As I was saying, graphene oxide has an absorption band from which it oxidizes much more quicklywhen a small button is turned on to provide 5G coverage or to perform a technological test. Do you think it is a coincidence that Wuhan —where the pangolin and bat soup came from as distraction elements— is the first city in the world with the 5G technology trial at the end of November 2019 and that all previous flu vaccination probably with graphene oxide started from there?

I've been waiting for someone on this forum to fall for the "graphene oxide" magnification, nano lies.
You claim this is the evidence that 5G is harmful, so why are you mentioning fake "space satellites" in conjunction with 5g if its real?

"Incredibly, we are narrating a science fiction movie, but believe me, today nanoscience, neuroscience and biotechnology have advanced tremendously."
you are narrating a science fiction movie, and no, i won't beLIEve you.

"Can a person be controlled or neurocontrolled remotely wirelessly? Yes, it can be done and it is probably being done in a disguised way"
Doesn't provide evidence proving this, but "probably" counts as proof right?

"As I say, I know I am drawing a science fiction movie, but at the heights we are at it can be difficult to really believe in something."
I know i'm spewing unproven sci-fi crap but please beLIEve!

"As I was saying, graphene oxide has an absorption band from which it oxidizes much more quicklywhen a small button is turned on to provide 5G coverage or to perform a technological test."
Where's the proof proving this statement? oh right, gotta beLIEve

"Do you think it is a coincidence that Wuhan —where the pangolin and bat soup came from as distraction elements— is the first city in the world with the 5G technology trial at the end of November 2019 and that all previous flu vaccination probably with graphene oxide started from there?"
it probably has graphene oxide, so guess work is now proof?

It's really quite simple, if 5g is harmful, prove it using experiments anyone and everyone can do.
If people are being magnetized why does sticking a magnet to the vaccinated not do anything for me when i tested it? I heard people say that it only works on some people, how convenient, can't test to see if people are being magnetized myself, guess i gotta beLIEve some videos i've seen on the internet.

Notice how 5g, microchips, nanoparticles, and people being "magnetized" are being used by the brainwashed to make fun of "anti vaxxers"
Now whenever i try and tell people about vaccines being unknown injections coming from strangers and how it doesn't even make sense to trust strangers to inject you with unknown substances, i have to deal with hive minded people marginalizing and strawmanning my position by claiming that i beLIEve vaccines contain microchips, nanoparticles, people being magnetized, and 5g controlling people.
Then look who's promoting this sci-fi nonsense, alex jones, david icke, and every controlled opp agent alive.

5G, microchips and nanoparticles supposedly being in vaccines, people supposedly being magnetized by "graphene oxide" in vaccines, these claims are controlled opposition lies meant to get people to write off anyone against vaccines as a crazy conspiracy theorist, which is what controlled opposition is meant to do

I personally have witnessed the magnitized injection site on a friend’s arm. Must have a certain type of magnet since he tested several. When I witness it with my own eyes and feel the magnetic resistance it is a bit more than beLIEf.

susie wrote:

Russian Blue Cat wrote:

susie wrote:And an external net, which is the one used by space satellites to supposedly provide 5G coverage.


Incredibly, we are narrating a science fiction movie, but believe me, today nanoscience, neuroscience and biotechnology have advanced tremendously.We have only made an approximation in the realm of science and behind the back of civil society. Can a person be controlled or neurocontrolled remotely wirelessly? Yes, it can be done and it is probably being done in a disguised way, and that may explain some of the anomalous behavioral behavior of the population, especially those who have been inoculated or who have received doses of graphene oxide by different ways. As I say, I know I am drawing a science fiction movie, but at the heights we are at it can be difficult to really believe in something. In this sense we say that COVID-19 is only the collateral effect of the introduction of that nanocomposite by different ways, and we suspect that it was introduced in the 2019 anti-flu campaign.

As I was saying, graphene oxide has an absorption band from which it oxidizes much more quicklywhen a small button is turned on to provide 5G coverage or to perform a technological test. Do you think it is a coincidence that Wuhan —where the pangolin and bat soup came from as distraction elements— is the first city in the world with the 5G technology trial at the end of November 2019 and that all previous flu vaccination probably with graphene oxide started from there?

I've been waiting for someone on this forum to fall for the "graphene oxide" magnification, nano lies.
You claim this is the evidence that 5G is harmful, so why are you mentioning fake "space satellites" in conjunction with 5g if its real?

"Incredibly, we are narrating a science fiction movie, but believe me, today nanoscience, neuroscience and biotechnology have advanced tremendously."
you are narrating a science fiction movie, and no, i won't beLIEve you.

"Can a person be controlled or neurocontrolled remotely wirelessly? Yes, it can be done and it is probably being done in a disguised way"
Doesn't provide evidence proving this, but "probably" counts as proof right?

"As I say, I know I am drawing a science fiction movie, but at the heights we are at it can be difficult to really believe in something."
I know i'm spewing unproven sci-fi crap but please beLIEve!

"As I was saying, graphene oxide has an absorption band from which it oxidizes much more quicklywhen a small button is turned on to provide 5G coverage or to perform a technological test."
Where's the proof proving this statement? oh right, gotta beLIEve

"Do you think it is a coincidence that Wuhan —where the pangolin and bat soup came from as distraction elements— is the first city in the world with the 5G technology trial at the end of November 2019 and that all previous flu vaccination probably with graphene oxide started from there?"
it probably has graphene oxide, so guess work is now proof?

It's really quite simple, if 5g is harmful, prove it using experiments anyone and everyone can do.
If people are being magnetized why does sticking a magnet to the vaccinated not do anything for me when i tested it? I heard people say that it only works on some people, how convenient, can't test to see if people are being magnetized myself, guess i gotta beLIEve some videos i've seen on the internet.

Notice how 5g, microchips, nanoparticles, and people being "magnetized" are being used by the brainwashed to make fun of "anti vaxxers"
Now whenever i try and tell people about vaccines being unknown injections coming from strangers and how it doesn't even make sense to trust strangers to inject you with unknown substances, i have to deal with hive minded people marginalizing and strawmanning my position by claiming that i beLIEve vaccines contain microchips, nanoparticles, people being magnetized, and 5g controlling people.
Then look who's promoting this sci-fi nonsense, alex jones, david icke, and every controlled opp agent alive.

5G, microchips and nanoparticles supposedly being in vaccines, people supposedly being magnetized by "graphene oxide" in vaccines, these claims are controlled opposition lies meant to get people to write off anyone against vaccines as a crazy conspiracy theorist, which is what controlled opposition is meant to do

I personally have witnessed the magnitized injection site on a friend’s arm.  Must have a certain type of magnet since he tested several.  When I witness it with my own eyes and feel the magnetic resistance it is a bit more than beLIEf.

Graphene oxide is something that can be easily purchased. You believe that ‘vaccines‘ are poison, why wouldn’t you believe it’s found in a poisonous injection? The Dr. published a scientific paper on his discovery of the injection in a vial. I believe he concluded by saying more tests need to be done.
What problem do you have exactly with his theory? I believe he published his findings.
If this is about agenda 2030 and reducing the population, Graphene oxide will work just fine.

susie wrote:

Russian Blue Cat wrote:

susie wrote:And an external net, which is the one used by space satellites to supposedly provide 5G coverage.


Incredibly, we are narrating a science fiction movie, but believe me, today nanoscience, neuroscience and biotechnology have advanced tremendously.We have only made an approximation in the realm of science and behind the back of civil society. Can a person be controlled or neurocontrolled remotely wirelessly? Yes, it can be done and it is probably being done in a disguised way, and that may explain some of the anomalous behavioral behavior of the population, especially those who have been inoculated or who have received doses of graphene oxide by different ways. As I say, I know I am drawing a science fiction movie, but at the heights we are at it can be difficult to really believe in something. In this sense we say that COVID-19 is only the collateral effect of the introduction of that nanocomposite by different ways, and we suspect that it was introduced in the 2019 anti-flu campaign.

As I was saying, graphene oxide has an absorption band from which it oxidizes much more quicklywhen a small button is turned on to provide 5G coverage or to perform a technological test. Do you think it is a coincidence that Wuhan —where the pangolin and bat soup came from as distraction elements— is the first city in the world with the 5G technology trial at the end of November 2019 and that all previous flu vaccination probably with graphene oxide started from there?

I've been waiting for someone on this forum to fall for the "graphene oxide" magnification, nano lies.
You claim this is the evidence that 5G is harmful, so why are you mentioning fake "space satellites" in conjunction with 5g if its real?

"Incredibly, we are narrating a science fiction movie, but believe me, today nanoscience, neuroscience and biotechnology have advanced tremendously."
you are narrating a science fiction movie, and no, i won't beLIEve you.

"Can a person be controlled or neurocontrolled remotely wirelessly? Yes, it can be done and it is probably being done in a disguised way"
Doesn't provide evidence proving this, but "probably" counts as proof right?

"As I say, I know I am drawing a science fiction movie, but at the heights we are at it can be difficult to really believe in something."
I know i'm spewing unproven sci-fi crap but please beLIEve!

"As I was saying, graphene oxide has an absorption band from which it oxidizes much more quicklywhen a small button is turned on to provide 5G coverage or to perform a technological test."
Where's the proof proving this statement? oh right, gotta beLIEve

"Do you think it is a coincidence that Wuhan —where the pangolin and bat soup came from as distraction elements— is the first city in the world with the 5G technology trial at the end of November 2019 and that all previous flu vaccination probably with graphene oxide started from there?"
it probably has graphene oxide, so guess work is now proof?

It's really quite simple, if 5g is harmful, prove it using experiments anyone and everyone can do.
If people are being magnetized why does sticking a magnet to the vaccinated not do anything for me when i tested it? I heard people say that it only works on some people, how convenient, can't test to see if people are being magnetized myself, guess i gotta beLIEve some videos i've seen on the internet.

Notice how 5g, microchips, nanoparticles, and people being "magnetized" are being used by the brainwashed to make fun of "anti vaxxers"
Now whenever i try and tell people about vaccines being unknown injections coming from strangers and how it doesn't even make sense to trust strangers to inject you with unknown substances, i have to deal with hive minded people marginalizing and strawmanning my position by claiming that i beLIEve vaccines contain microchips, nanoparticles, people being magnetized, and 5g controlling people.
Then look who's promoting this sci-fi nonsense, alex jones, david icke, and every controlled opp agent alive.

5G, microchips and nanoparticles supposedly being in vaccines, people supposedly being magnetized by "graphene oxide" in vaccines, these claims are controlled opposition lies meant to get people to write off anyone against vaccines as a crazy conspiracy theorist, which is what controlled opposition is meant to do

I personally have witnessed the magnitized injection site on a friend’s arm.  Must have a certain type of magnet since he tested several.  When I witness it with my own eyes and feel the magnetic resistance it is a bit more than beLIEf.

I second that. My fiancé and I have tried this at work and has worked on multiple people who got the Pfizer vaxxx.

Among the daily and hourly tracking of infection rates, the advent of contact tracing and the political bantering, the novel coronavirus pandemic certainly revealed many things about how society prepares and battles infectious disease overall.

To focus exclusively on the efficacy of the medical mask, the intent of protecting the public seemed noble enough. For each person who willfully wears a medical mask, the action seemed like it was better-than-nothing and perhaps, it just felt good to Do-Something to battle the pandemic.

That expressed intent of Doing-Something made two very broad medical assumptions:

A) A medical mask is clinically Better-Than-Nothing in minimizing the outbound transmitted spread of infected droplets during exhalation.

B) A medical mask blocks inbound infectious particles during inhalation.

Based largely on Assumption A, Governor Andrew M. Cuomo of New York State, USA, issued an executive order in April 2020 requiring all persons to wear masks in public.

https://www.wnypapers.com/news/article/current/2020/04/16/141051/cuomo-issues-executive-order-requiring-all-people-in-new-york-to-wear-masks-or-face-coverings-in-public

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/15/nyregion/coronavirus-face-masks-andrew-cuomo.html

About one month later, Governor Cuomo boasted that masks were working by absorbing outbound droplets, "I don’t think we need to wait for this sort of evidence to conclude that it is a worthwhile activity, particularly for preventing transmission from infectious but asymptomatic individuals by absorbing droplets that otherwise might be dispersed into the air."

https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2020/05/20/new-yorks-governor-says-the-benefits-of-masks-are-amazing-canadians-would-be-wise-to-listen.html

This is not an attack directed at Governor Cuomo. On the contrary, the governor's exceptional candor, early on, had transcended politics and even made it quite easy to understand the New York State policy on the subject at large. Governor Cuomo's statements in support of masking made perfect sense for the public desire to Do-Something to combat the coronavirus.

But there is a much bigger issue at stake, beyond encouraging or mandating mask use by Executive Order, the bigger issue is that a mask must be considered a clinical, biomedical device, requiring patient consent to use for an expressed medical purpose.

There are directions for use, but by-and-large, there is an absence of medical warnings and there were no waivers issued for certain individuals who cannot or should not wear an appliance that can block and reduce their respiration airflow.

It seems so very simple to put on a mask to cover the nose and mouth to absorb particles of moisture during exhalation. But consider this, the labeling of reduced- and low-calorie beverages as "Diet" is illegal in many countries, because a "diet" is a medical procedure, requiring physician supervision.

http://www.sarayest.com/uncategorized/why-coca-cola-light-and-diet-coke/

A diet is a medical procedure. A mask is a biomedical device.

Meanwhile, even though a wearing medical mask may seem to be a simple procedure, wearing the mask incorrectly will completely nullify its effectiveness. With that in mind, wearing the mask incorrectly will even endanger other people who may approach the wrongful wearer. The rationale that every person wearing a mask is safe to approach has just invited disaster.

If you think that it is safe to approach a person wearing a mask, you would be wrong.

All masks are not created equally. Recent evidence reveals that materials such as fleece are absolutely ineffective at blocking exhaled particles.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/reviewedcom/2020/08/11/study-finds-neck-gaiters-wont-protect-you-covid-19-heres-what-get-instead/3343474001/

China has been wearing masks since the SARS and bird-flu outbreaks of the early 2000s and have generally worn them in public ever since. These masks obviously did not stop the virus from escaping clinical lockdown in Wuhan and subsequently infecting every known area of human existence.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15539054/

In 2010, France had banned all face-coverings as a matter of national security and personal freedom within their republic. But then in May 2020, they immediately imposed face masks with stiff legal penalties with little evidence that masks would be effective against halting coronavirus.

First, France banned facemasks -- and then France mandated facemasks. Sacre Bleu! Zut alors! Mon Dieu!

https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2020/5/15/coronavirus-exposed-the-real-reasons-behind-frances-burqa-ban

The clear plastic face shields, even though they probably blocked more droplets, were frowned upon, forbidden or forced users to also use a medical mask in addition to the face shield.

This reveals the evidence of the REAL reason for face masks -- facial recognition software had crashed and needed time to process and reboot. When hundreds of billions of pictures are snapped by apps, traffic cameras and cash machines each day, the time required to recognize and process each one adds up.

Tech billionaires collectively seemed to have a sudden, highly keen interest in fighting Coronavirus, to the point of raising suspicion. By comparison, these same benevolent billionaires have never expressed much concern about fighting heart disease or cancer, which have killed hundreds of millions of people over the years.

But now, there is a bigger disease attacking their tech babies -- facial recognition applications demanding greater and greater bandwidth and computing power.

There are Apps that will eat up more server capacity than Facebook, Netflix and YouTube combined, they fall under the machine-learning, artificial intelligence, Application Programming Interface and Software Development Kits involved with Facial Recognition.

Perhaps it is possible that tech billionaires have conspired to create and include Embedded injection nanoparticle human telemetry bio-computers as part of each COVID vaccine shot. That topic has been explored and conjectured upon this platform and many others, with plenty of material to review and ponder.

But for now, the focus upon masks and facial recognition empowers the understanding of Computer Vision, specifically facial recognition, begins Face detection, including mask-on, in stills and videos. With up to 70 facial features, facial expressions, gender, age, demographic recognition are extracted from any webcam, smartphone camera, IP camera, thermal camera, live stream, and video call while recognizing the same face from various angles and lighting conditions.

ClearView AI, run by Huon Ton That, is the next iteration of SmartCheckR and they have automated all government, police & FBI cross-checking of facial recognition. This leverages all Driver License photos against social media and web platforms and now municipal and traffic cameras.

Amazon Rekognition - AWS running on ML "machine learning" algorithm is an artificial intelligence that never forgets and never stops.

Microsoft Azure Facial Recognition -- this is a portion of what Microsoft has under the Azure Cognitive Services menu of service-level agreements (SLAs), which are monetized tasks, typically ten tasks for one cent.

What is a "task" then and how do these cognitive services, which are available in various forms from ClearView AI, Amazon
Rekognition, and Microsoft Azure, monetize each transaction, as a computer automated purchase order? Why not mention Google and FaceBook and Twitter all the other members of this facial wrecking cabal? Here goes:

1) The grouped Application Programming Interface (API) keys for Computer Vision, or image-recognition tasks run for about one-tenth of one US cent per image and can process ten requests per second, per customer. Computer Vision encompasses the following:

a. Tagging -- cross-referencing social media platforms to associate known names to faces.

b. Facial Recognition -- matching facing across social media, municipal cameras, live feed video and internet sites.

c. GetThumbnail -- producing a 72 dpi image of a digitized photo or a section of the photo.

d. Color recognition -- returns a numeric indication of color, standardized with the Red-Green-Blue on a scale parentheses of (R, G, B), where Red=(255, 0, 0), Black=(0, 0, 0) and White=(255,255,255).

e. Image Type -- identifies descriptive categorizations by forms and shapes within a digitized picture or media file.

f. GetAreaOfInterest -- encapsulates what is known as a "bounding box" around what the AI considering to be the most important area of the image and provides results in JavaScript Open Notation (JSON).

2) Next, the grouped Application Programming Interface (API) keys for more specialized Computer Vision, also run for about one-tenth of one US cent per image and will process ten requests per second, per customer:

a. OCR - optical character recognition, such as reading signs, billboards, mailboxes or even papers in someone's hand, and converting that to computerized text.

b. Adult Content - this will recognize pictures of human genitalia, breasts, gluteal cleft (also known as the butt crack), pelvic areas, pubic hair, or excess exposed skin to identify the images as nudity or pornography.

c. Celebrity - as an add-on to facial recognition, the celebrity recognition feature will tag celebrities within images to mark for copyright adherence, content promotion, and advertisements.

d. Landmark - recognizes terrain, vegetation, coastlines, water, railways, buildings, roads, and intersections against the database of known landmarks to confirm locations and features.

e. Detect Objects - recognizes objects within the image, such as weapons, commercial items, clothing and other accoutrements.

3) Finally, the most premium features will bridge imagery, facial recognition with documents and language will leverage costs per transaction:

a. Description -- an automated text response summary of recognized Vision data from any of the aforementioned categories.

b. Reading and Language -- extracts language in a document using context and inference derived from AI neural network called ReasoNet among a few other neural networks.

c. Content Moderator -- moderates content within language extracted from ReasoNet and others to block content when identified as potentially unsafe or inappropriate.

d. Face Automated Storage -- detects, verifies, identifies, groups and cross-references similar facial features and enables storage in increments of 1,000 faces on a monthly basis.

These are the keys to understanding the Great Masquerade of 2020 (and most of 2021, so far).

When these Automated Assignments of facial recognition bridged with the immediate taskings to store the faces, the scale went haywire and they could not just pull the plug. When a computer is told to do something, it will typically carry out the assignment to completion and provide the feedback, requesting and/or awaiting its next task.

Clearview AI, Amazon Rekognition and Microsoft Azure Cognitive Services can carry out ten requests per second for each of the hundreds of millions of subscribers, this equates to hundreds of billions of images in the queue each day. To process, tag and store these images became a mighty hiccup for these relatively new services.

Google, FaceBook and Twitter had already long-established facial recognition, through tagging and other processes. They had established monetization through advertisements, keywords and so on. But when Clearview AI, Amazon Rekognition and Microsoft Azure Cognitive Services, contracted the Facial Recognition tasks, including broad, sweeping government contracts that were already requested by the late part of 2019.

So at that point, when social media photos and videos curdled with the tens of billions of publicly-available still images, added with government photos, passports and drivers licenses, meeting with the influx and addition of the hundreds of billions of government live stream, traffic and municipal cameras which then spiraled with the spew of smartphone and social media traffic.

Pardon the run-on sentence, but these servers could not process the data.

To slow down the flood of new inbound billions and billions of images from millions of social media accounts, government live stream traffic and municipal cameras and so on would require that just about every person, everywhere would need to somehow obscure about two-thirds of their faces, and/or stay out of public entirely -- or the entire system would crash.

The purchase orders for the services were already in place. Billions upon billions of US Dollars of purchase orders were already tasked. The tasks could not be canceled, because such a cancellation order takes much more time to process -- especially on a few hundred billion queued tasks.

Every wireless phone has a camera now -- many phones have several cameras.

Municipal cameras, traffic cameras, automated teller machine cameras.

Facial Recognition -- ten for a penny!

The catch-up period required two weeks to reset.

The catch-up period required another two weeks to reset.

Maybe another two weeks, to flatten the curve.

And another two weeks … and a shutdown … and a lockdown … and a quarantine … and, well, you were there, you saw the empty streets, stadiums and enforced compliance.

The masks work, right?

A mask is a biomedical device. A biomedical device requires patient consent.

Unless ... hmmm ...

A mask is actually a computing device, a photo-filter, enabling the worldwide reset of facial recognition AI platforms.

And you've already agreed to those Terms and Conditions.

https://youtu.be/fuGF5TeBNaM

Right at the end, a little slip of the tongue, ‘this is all about isola….ventilation’.

Blood smear samples from healthy individuals vs persons who have been injected:

https://rumble.com/vjw5kq-breaking-discovery-what-covid-injections-do-to-your-blood-doctor-releases-h.html

Injection site connectivity

Injection site illumination:
Skin glows at Injection site

susie wrote:Injection site illumination:
Skin glows at Injection site

The link leads to an invite page. No video.

Russian Hacker Haxx the Vaxx

notdownunder wrote:

In 1913, John D. Rockefeller Sr. took full control of Western Medicine and promoted what's known as "germ theory" in hopes to control the world and peddle patented vaccines & pharmaceuticals on unsuspecting, fearful citizens.


Details on Germ Theory vs. Terrain Theory: https://www.bitchute.com/video/9OoEO2oTS64v/

Thank you so much. I've been looking for information on this subject for awhile. If germ theory turns out to be a lie then my mind will be sufficiently blown for the day.

CDC created Sars Cov 2 in NC. Patented then CDC got possession and patented it also.
“Novel” has been patented 78 times since then.

Rico case emerging since CDC patented and 3 days later the “cure” was patented by a drug co.

susie wrote:
CDC created Sars Cov 2 in NC.  Patented then CDC got possession and patented it also.
“Novel” has been patented 78 times since then.

Rico case emerging since CDC patented and 3 days later the “cure” was patented by a drug co.

I got to watch the video 2 days ago. If we truly had a free press this would be front page news everywhere. If we truly had a justice department every senior official at the CDC would be locked up. Instead all you find are hit pieces against Dr. David Martin. Towards the end of the video he mentions Moderna filed for the COVID vaccine in use today on November 2019.

FOIA EVERYWHERE PROVE IT HAS NEVER BEEN ISOLATED/DOES NOT EXIST

World’s 2nd biggest PSYOP.