Nuclear Hoax - Nukes Do Not Exist!

The following documentary explores the truth about nuclear energy and the surprisingly abundant evidence that nuclear weapons are a hoax. Many of the nuclear explosion videos we have all seen and presumed real are shown to be complete fakes using model trees, houses and cars exploding on a set. The destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not the result of one large explosion as advertized, but rather the result of a fire-bombing campaign comparable to Tokyo's fire-bombed remains. Hiroshima and Nagasaki also never experienced anything like the hundreds or thousands of years of radiation predicted by nuclear scientists, in fact, vegetation began growing within a month after the bombing, and the Japanese people began rebuilding almost immediately! Some nuclear physicists even claim nuclear weaponry fraudulent based solely on the technical impossibilities of fission material not to be incinerated before triggering the necessary chain reaction. Top nuclear physicist Galen Winsor explains how nuclear power plants are essentially just steam plants and nothing but the most expensive and effective way to boil water.  He completely blows the lid off the idea of "nuclear meltdown" or "nuclear waste," and even eats a good portion of live radioactive waste on camera which he claims to have been doing for years!  His professional opinion is that fear of nuclear radiation has been greatly exaggerated to scare people and so a few powerful organizations can maintain total control of the world's most valuable energy resource.  Thanks to Edmund Matthews for compiling the majority of footage and big thanks to Greg Carlwood for releasing the second-hour of our nuke interview.  Be sure to give some love and subscribe to his Higherside Chats, check out the documentary, read through the excellent Nuke Lies Forum (NukeLies.org), and leave a comment what you think about this nuclear hoax. Was the government teaching school-children to hide under their desks just to induce fear and funnel black tax money into a fake Cold War arms race as big and deceptive as the fake Space Race!?

Post by schpankme on May 1, 2015 at 6:32pm

Global Thermal Nuclear War - Earth's looming mass extinction - "shall we play a game?"

Fear Porn

Post by sonofadam on May 2, 2015 at 1:49am

checkout how sloppy they are about protecting the supposed nukes

Post by harry on May 3, 2015 at 9:49pm

I wanted to ask about fukushima, do you think all the reports of pacific sea life dying is just fear mongering?... I was pretty heart broken by fukushima, I now have my doubts about the whole thing.

Thanks to this forum, im starting to appreciate how controlled the alternative opposition is.

Post by lizardking on May 4, 2015 at 12:39am

Fukushima leaking radioactive water for ‘2 years, 300 tons flowing into Pacific daily’

What does this sound like, other than fear mongering?

Post by rebecca on May 4, 2015 at 2:10am

The nuke hoax........watched it yesterday. What another eye opener! Just shows you.....believe nothing they tell you.
Was very impressed with Galen Winsor in the vid. Immediately I saw this guy was telling the truth.
Found a lengthy talk he gave on the subject. I don't know what better proof anyone would need than listen to this man!
This is one deep rabbit hole! But so positive as it is just another thing that one doesn't have to worry about. I feel very liberated by it!
But the length o their deceit wow.......just blows my mind!
Wonder what they do with all the money then ? That so called Cold War cost everyone a fortune! And so much fear!

Post by schpankme on May 12, 2015 at 6:05pm

May 12, 2015 at 5:13pm highpriestofslack said:
Qualifications: I operated and managed a nuclear reactor at sea as part of my time in the US Navy.

Neutrons bombarding nuclei cause fission
neutrons released from a fissio

Provide evidence of the Neutron?

Sir James Chadwick,Cambridge Theoretical Physics, Discovers the Neutron:
James Chadwick was working at the Cavendish laboratory in Cambridge at that time. The lab was directed by Ernest Rutherford,
and reportedly when Chadwick relayed the Joliot-Curie results and interpretation to Rutherford, he exclaimed “I do not believe it!”

THEORY
"The neutron electric dipole moment (nEDM) is a measure for the distribution of positive and negative charge inside the neutron."
"A permanent electric dipole moment of a fundamental particle violates both parity (P) and time reversal symmetry (T). "

"NEUTRON DIFFUSION THEORY - The diffusion theory model of neutron transport plays a crucial role in reactor theory since it is
simple enough to allow scientific insight, and it is sufficiently realistic to study many important design problems. The neutrons are
here characterized by a single energy or speed, and the model allows preliminary design estimates. The mathematical methods
used to analyze such a model are the same as those applied in more sophisticated methods such as multi-group diffusion theory,
and transport theory."

Theory of Neutron β-Decay, requiring four fundamental interactions: electromagnetic, strong, weak, and gravitational.

Let me be the FIRST to call Bullshit.

Post by andy on May 20, 2015 at 2:36pm

Have seen the Galen Winsor vids before and for me they fit in with all the other lies that i have bought into, looking at the footage of the explosions now is just like looking at the moon landings in that they just look so fake.
Here's a couple of links on the subject,

http://heiwaco.tripod.com/bomb.htm
http://mileswmathis.com/bikini.pdf

Enjoy

Post by Observicus on Jun 13, 2015 at 8:59am

Led by a link from bgh46 in Geocentricity thread to the interesting researcher Anders Bjorkman of Heiwa Co,
the Atomic Bomb section has an image of the aftermath. Photoshop in 1945?

Post by planetruth on Jun 20, 2015 at 5:40pm

Hi,
I'm still of two minds on the subect of complete nuke hoax or partial nuke hoax.

on one hand I would like to see more modern proof of no radiation from nukes. Someone in Fallujah, Iraq or the many other areas DU is said, and recorded, to have been used by U.S. military would help. Anyone wish to ingest plutonium or uranium to prove the pt.? Interview nuke scientists on the record to refute Galen Winsor's strong pts....pt. by pt., etc.

on the other hand, how the hell did Japan keep all electricity and power on all Summer long in 2013 after they shut down all but one of the nuke plans? it's not like Japan doesn't like their electricity and the country is said to have been nearly nuke dependent for power.  

http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jun/07/local/la-me-0608-san-onofre-20130608



Additionally, in S. California, at San Onofre nuke plant that was permanently shut down last year, after temporarily shut down and 1.4 million customers never had a power interruption. No Problema!  WTF??  All residents were left with a billion dollar IOU thou.

Still questioning.

Post by Admin on Jun 20, 2015 at 6:38pm

Jun 20, 2015 at 5:40pm planetruth said:
Hi,
I'm still of two minds on the subect of complete nuke hoax or partial nuke hoax.

on one hand I would like to see more modern proof of no radiation from nukes. Someone in Fallujah, Iraq or the many other areas DU is said, and recorded, to have been used by U.S. military would help. Anyone wish to ingest plutonium or uranium to prove the pt.? Interview nuke scientists on the record to refute Galen Winsor's strong pts....pt. by pt., etc.

There is definitely depleted uranium being used in non-nuclear weapons in the middle-east and these have indeed caused birth defects etc. and are highly radioactive. I was watching something about how the use of depleted uranium has completely made tank warfare obsolete because one hand-held depleted uranium round can eat through the tanks then asphyxiate and burn everyone inside as it incinerates and instantly uses up all the oxygen. Nuclear chain reactions have never been shown to exist, all the nuke test footage is fake, the Hiroshima/Nagasaki footage is spliced, vegetation started growing immediately and it is a thriving city now. No thousands of years of radiation, no birth defects. The areas had clearly been fire-bombed and were not the result of single centralized explosions. The military certainly has devastating weapons of mass destruction, but they are not "nuclear" and their use would not result in the Hollywood super-radioactive fall-out apocalypse - that is all just fear porn.

Post by schpankme on Jun 20, 2015 at 7:55pm

Jun 20, 2015 at 6:38pm Admin said:
depleted uranium being used in non-nuclear weapons
caused birth defects
highly radioactive
has completely made tank warfare obsolete
can eat through the tanks then asphyxiate and burn everyone inside

It's interesting to note, that in the manufacture of these "kinetic energy weapons", Depleted Uranium is classified
as a dense alloy, or Staballoy.

"Depleted Uranium is pyrophoric; the heated fragments of the penetrator ignite after impact on contact with air,
setting fire to fuel and/or ammunition in the target vehicle, thereby compensating for the lack of an explosive
warhead in the penetrator."

Post by schpankme on Jun 22, 2015 at 9:53am

Jun 22, 2015 at 9:28am harry said:
i wondered if all sea life was being slow killed

Commercial Fishing kills between:

• 1 trillion to 2 trillion Fish/Aquatic Mammals/Shellfish/other, yearly
  
• "In fact, 90 percent of large fish populations have been exterminated in the past 50 years."
  

Fukushima was a means to promote Fake Nukes, Fear Porn and the reduction of Ocean Life.


References: 

[1] “Worse things happen at sea: the welfare of wild-caught fish.” 
       www.fishcount.org.uk/published/standard/fishcountfullrptSR.pdf

[2] “Global and regional food consumption patterns and trends: Availability and consumption of fish.” World Health Organization.
       www.who.int/nutrition/topics/3_foodconsumption/en/index5.html

[3] “Current Marine Use and the AMSA Shipping Database.” Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment. April 29, 2009. 
       www.arctic.gov/publications/AMSA/current_marine_use.pdf

[4] “Fishing Vessel Types.” Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 
        www.fao.org/fishery/vesseltype/100/en

[5] “Driftnets: Overview.” Oceana. 
        oceana.org/en/eu/our-work/responsible-fishing/dirty-fishing/driftnets/overview

[6] “Fishing Methods.” Monterey Bay Aquarium.
       www.montereybayaquarium.org/cr/cr_seafoodwatch/sfw_gear.aspx

[7] “Big-Fish Stocks Fall 90 Percent Since 1950, Study Says.” National Geographic. 2003. 
        news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/05/0515_030515_fishdecline.html

[8] “Overfishing Large Sharks Impacts Entire Marine Ecosystem, Shrinks Shellfish Supply.” ScienceDaily. March 29, 2007.
       www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/03/070329145922.htm(1/25/11)

[9] Cosgrove-Mather, Bootie. “Shark Populations Petering Out.” CBS News. January 16, 2003.
       www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/01/16/tech/main536815.shtml (1/25/11)

[10] “Overfishing Large Sharks Impacts Entire Marine Ecosystem, Shrinks Shellfish Supply.” ScienceDaily. March 29, 2007. 
          www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/03/070329145922.htm(1/25/11)

[11] “Race for Fish Killing Millions of Marine Turtles.” Environmental News Service. April 8, 2010.
         www.ens-newswire.com/ens/apr2010/2010-04-08-01.html (1/25/11)

[12] Ovetz, Robert. “Prominent Scientists Join Call for UN Moratorium on Longline Fishing.” The Baltimore Chronicle. February 2, 2005. 
         baltimorechronicle.com/020205SeaTurtle.shtml(1/25/11)

[13] Alverson, D.L., Freeberg, M.H., et al. “A global assessment of fisheries bycatch and discards.” FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 339. 1994.
         www.fao.org/docrep/003/t4890e/T4890E00.HTM (1/25/11)

[14] Heilprin, John. “Wasted bycatch detailed in study.” Seattle PI. Thursday, December 1, 2005.
         www.seattlepi.com/national/250412_fish01.html (1/25/11)

[15] Skaggs, Sean. “Sea Turtles and Turtle Excluder Devices: A Review of Recent Events.” William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review. 1990.
         scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1388&context=wmelpr (1/25/11)

[16] Viegas, Jennifer. “Millions of Sea Turtles Captured, Killed by Fisheries.” Discovery. April 6, 2010. 
         news.discovery.com/animals/turtles-bycatch-fishing.html (1/25/11)

[17] “Coral Reef Protection: What Are Coral Reefs?” Environmental Protection Agency.
          water.epa.gov/type/oceb/habitat/coral_index.cfm (1/25/11)

[18] “’Sobering’ Decline Of Caribbean’s Big Fish, Fisheries: Overfishing Deemed Most Likely Cause.” ScienceDaily. May 6, 2009.
         www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/05/090505200711.htm (1/25/11)

[19] Stevely, John. “Invasive lionfish harming Caribbean reefs.” Florida Sea Grant Extension.
         www.flseagrant.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=92:lionfish-decimating-caribbeans-tropical-fish-population&catid=51:research-summary&Itemid=101 (1/25/11)

[20] Stier, Ken. “Fish Farming’s Growing Dangers.” Time. September 19, 2007.
         www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1663604,00.html (1/25/11)

[21] Rosamond, L.N., Hardyb, R.W., et al. “Feeding aquaculture in an era of finite resources.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. July 17, 2009
         www.pnas.org/content/106/36/15103.full

[22] Stier, Ken. “Fish Farming’s Growing Dangers.” Time. September 19, 2007.
         www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1663604,00.html (1/25/11)

[23] Emerson, Craig. “Aquaculture Impacts on the Environment.” ProQuest. December 1999.
         www.csa.com/discoveryguides/aquacult/overview.php (1/25/11)

[24] Gillis, Damien. “Farm Salmon Exposed.” (video documentary) The Pure Salmon Campaign. 2010. 
         www.salmonatlas.com/forums/news-announcements/4457-farmed-salmon-exposed-global-reach-norwegian-salmon-farming-industry.html (1/25/11)

[25] “Interesting Ocean Facts.” Save the Sea. 
         [url=http://savethesea.org/STS ocean_facts.htm(1/25/11)]savethesea.org/STS%20ocean_facts.htm(1/25/11)[/url]

[26] “Open ocean: importance.” World Wildlife Fund.
         wwf.panda.org/about_our_earth/blue_planet/open_ocean/ocean_importance/ (1/25/11)

[27] Weise, Elizabeth. “Study: 90% of the ocean’s edible species may be gone by 2048.” USA Today. November 3, 2006. Retrieved 3/10/2013 from 
        usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/science/discoveries/2006-11-02-overfishing-threat_x.htm

Post by tlef on Jul 9, 2015 at 4:17am

Here is a short "Nuke Cannon" video. Looks really fake. Incredible that people believe this.

Post by glog on Jul 14, 2015 at 11:28am

Ken Adachi has posted some good evidence of the Japan radiation B.S. On his website.

See: educate-yourself.org/cn/tokyodailyradiationmonitor03dec12.shtml

Post by navaho on Jul 18, 2015 at 9:23pm

If nuclear bombs are a hoax and I don't doubt it. I wonder what was the so called nuclear explosions during Operation Fishbowl in the late 50's and 60's. From what I have gathered they were trying to find out if there was a dome and how high it is. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starfish_Prime

Post by Admin on Aug 17, 2015 at 5:54pm



From the Rerevisionist: I run the nukelies site now. A few comments:

[1] www.nukelies.org was a forum, taken down without notice by its owner. I had a site-grabbed copy and restored as much as I could. But the ability to post wasn't restorable. However I do insert new material from time to time.

[2] On nuclear energy, I see confusion here. The claim we made was that all electricity is generated by coal or other fuel, or hydro-electricity. Plus a few bits. So called nuclear power stations are dumploads, like huge kettles to boil water. They are needed because demand for electricity varies. So there's a constant dumping of surplus. Most people can't imagine this: they pay their bills, and the idea of waste isn't part of their outlook.

[3] If you're in the mood for a very long (3 1/2 hour) video, Google 'LORDS OF THE NUKES' in Youtube. The two main voices are Rerevisionist and FirstClassSkeptic, from the Nukelies forum. The host is 'fakeologist', a Canadian who is not very well informed, but at any rate has done useful work.



[4] Most white people think of WW2 as an isolated event, standing by itself, a job to be done; or something like that. It's important to understand Jews don't work like that and are undistracted by atrocities, bombings, etc. For example Cuba was run by the Marrano Jew Castro, and was part of the whole Jewish process, just as much as faked films of 'nukes' and fake nuclear subs and missiles. I've tried to put all this into Lords of the Nukes. If you get through that video your worldview is likely to be completely changed.

Post by mitch on Aug 22, 2015 at 10:22am

The “No Nuclear Bombs” Conspiracy theory
August 17, 2015
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=120244

A badly argued article "armed with historical facts" and tired old claptrap about too many people wouldn't be able to keep the nuke hoax secret. "Political analyst", Franklin Ryckaert has also written some barmy Icke-esque nonsense about how jews are "demonic souls from a different world" here:

theunhivedmind.com/wordpress3/jews-are-demonic-souls-from-a-different-world-franklin-ryckaert-video/

Post by thomowen on Aug 23, 2015 at 7:04am

I think that this post deserves a big, "No shit" reply. A coal power plant is also a, "giant steam engine"...

Post by susie on Sep 14, 2015 at 12:36am


You've probably already heard about the Moon landing controversy. There is a LOT of reason to question that we got human beings through the Van Allen radiation belt to the moon and back again safely to the earth. But that's not all. There's something not quite right about the long range missile narrative too. And what about low altitude orbit craft like various space stations? The story falls apart upon close examination and common sense. Who benefits from these tales? Not us, that's for sure. - See more at: www.brasschecktv.com/videos/out-there-1/the-long-range-nuclear-missile-hoax.html#sthash.X96X9vKj.nP06sJcs.dpuf

Post by aphrodite on Nov 6, 2015 at 11:50am

26 April 1986, the Chernobyl (Ex USSR today Ucraine) Nuclear Power Plant’s Reactor No 4 blew up after a routine test, and the resulting fire lasted 10 days, "spewing 400 times as much radiation as the bomb dropped on Hiroshima. "..

About 116,000 people were evacuated from the Zone at the time of the accident.

1.Some 1,200 of them did not accept that fate. Of that group, the remaining women, now in their 70s and 80s, are the last survivors of a group.....

Those Babushkas they refused to leave 1986 (they was in 30 then).And now 2015 they are still alive and heathy .

thebabushkasofchernobyl.com/

www.huffingtonpost.com/adriana-aristizabal/the-babushkas-of-chernoby_b_7566314.html

2.Vegetation in Chernobyl ,Ucraine is perfect
images from google:

Чорнобиль, Київська область, Украјина
51.286441, 30.202587                                      51.281515, 30.214302

Post by susie on Nov 22, 2015 at 4:55pm

healthhubs.net/cancer/cancer-rates-in-the-usa-compared-to-japan/

2 "Nukes" later and a meltdown, and less cancer than US.

Cancer Rates In The USA Compared To Japan

Cancer rates vary dramatically between countries, none more so than between Japan and the USA. Overall age adjusted cancer rates in the USA are more than 50% higher than in Japan.

Americans have a 30% chance of developing cancer and a 11.2% chance of dying from it by the age of 75 compared to a 20.4% chance of developing cancer and a 9.7% chance of dying from it in Japan. The only common forms of cancer that are more prevalent in Japan are pancreatic, liver, colorectal, and stomach cancer. Interestingly enough, Japan has one of the lowest cancer rates in the developed world despite a relatively high percentage of Japanese being regular smokers.

The disparities in cancer rates are one of the major reasons life expectancy is almost five years higher in Japan than the United States (82.9 vs 78.1).

The following table shows age adjusted cancer rates per 100,000 people for both the United States and Japan courtesy of data from GLOBOCAN, 2008. Rates are for men and women combined with the exception of breast and prostate cancer which are female and male only rates respectively.

Cancer Type USA Rate Japan Rate
Prostate 83.8 22.7
Lung 42.1 24.6
Breast 76 42.7
Colorectal 29.2 31.5
Melanoma 14.3 0.5
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma 13.7 5.1
Bladder 12.7 4.8
Kidney 12.1 4.9
Thyroid 9.9 3.1
Leukaemia 9.9 4.3
Pancreatic 7.0 7.9
Liver 4.5 11.2
Stomach 5.7 31.1
Overall 335.0 201.1

Data courtesy of GLOBOCAN, 2008 (http://globocan.iarc.fr)

Interestingly, despite a much higher incidence, mortality from cancer is only marginally higher in the USA compared to Japan. The age standardized mortality rate from cancer in the USA is 104.1 per 100,000 compared to 94.8 per 100,000 in Japan, a difference of just 10%. This is partly due to the Japanese having higher rates of cancers that carry a poor prognosis such as pancreatic, liver, and stomach cancer, and partly due to superior survival rates across most cancer sites in the USA (despite many complaints about an inefficient health system, the USA has some of the highest cancer survival rates in the world).

Reasons for the differences in cancer rates between the two countries include: height and weight differences, differences in meat consumption, differences in fruit and vegetable consumption, skin color, salt intake, Helicobacter Pylori infection rates, hepatitis B & C rates, and differences in the carcinogenicity of cigarettes.

These factors are discussed in more detail below.

Height and weight differences: Japanese men and women are around 3 inches shorter than their American counterparts. Studies have found that tall people are more likely to develop several forms of cancer including colorectal, melanoma, and breast cancer. Americans are also much more likely to be overweight than Japanese people, 26% of adult Americans have a BMI over 30 compared to just 4% of Japanese. Obesity increases the risk of developing several forms of cancer including pancreatic, bladder, and prostate cancer.

Differences in meat consumption: Japanese eat less red and processed meats and more fish than Americans. Red and processed meats have been linked to an increased risk of colorectal and pancreatic cancer, particularly when they are cooked at high temperatures. Fish on the other hand has been linked to a decreased risk of some forms of cancer including the esophagus and colon.

Differences in fruit and vegetable consumption: The Japanese consume a similar amount of fruit to Americans but have a much higher vegetable intake (excluding potatoes). Popular vegetables in Japan include mushrooms, peppers, cabbage, spinach, daikon (radish), and green beans. High consumption of fruit and vegetables, particularly of the green leafy variety, can decrease overall cancer risk by as much as 15%.

Skin color: Japanese melanoma rates are much lower than Caucasian American rates because darker skin colors naturally protect against UV radiation.

Salt intake: A high intake of salt has been linked to an increased risk of stomach cancer. Japanese diets tend to be very high in salt. Soy sauce, a popular condiment in Japanese cuisine, contains more than 1,000mg of sodium per serving – almost half the recommended daily intake.

Helicobacter Pylori infection: Helicobacter Pylori is a bacterium that inhabits the upper gastro-intestinal tract of infected individuals. Helicobacter Pylori is thought to be responsible for as many as 80% of stomach cancer cases worldwide. Infection rates are higher in Japan than in the United States.

Hepatitis B & C rates: Hepatitis B and C combined are responsible for 78% of primary liver cancers. Both hepatitis B & C are more common in Japan where liver cancer rates are more than twice the rate of the USA.

Carcinogenicity of cigarettes: Cigarettes in Japan tend to have lower levels of carcinogens than cigarettes in the USA. Cigarette smoking raises the risk of cancers of the lung, oesophagus, stomach, colon, mouth, and pancreas among others.

Post by thinkforyourself on Nov 22, 2015 at 5:12pm

Nov 22, 2015 at 4:55pm susie said:
healthhubs.net/cancer/cancer-rates-in-the-usa-compared-to-japan/
2 "Nukes" later and a meltdown, and less cancer than US.

Great post Susie; this is yet further proof that there never were any Nuclear bombs in 1945, and that 'Fukushima' was nothing more than a heavy-water plant.