Questions About the Flat Earth

TyrannicalSawdustRex wrote:
Could you point me in the direction of the discrepancies across Australia that you mention please.

You'll find it in this thread: https://ifers.forumotion.com/t337p75-mapping-the-earth
On page 4 of 4, there is a video posted by pitagoras that deals with it.
You made a post below it on the same page.

Finally got to watch the video this morning . Nice to see the work the lad put in to show the discrepancies regarding the size of Australia and I don't like to criticize.

However the Gleason map is not an FE map. It is a representation of Globe model viewed as a plane. The latitudes are equidistant only on a globe , and on the AE map. Other posters on that thread have pointed this out too.

The pretence that the "Equator" is the mid point of the globe is a fantasy designed to back up the imaginary globe model.

Gleason's AE map is fundamentally flawed and is pushed as a flat earth map by the lunatics in power . It gives them a way to defeat the observable flat earth reality .

There are ways to produce a better map but using but using the AE map is not the way until you realise that the map is not distorted by longitude as stated by Gleason.

Tis the latitude that is distorted and leads to the exaggerated distances south of the equinoctial circle. These give ammunition to the globe pillocks - that seems to be the idea of that map.

If the sun is about 3,000 miles away (the length of the USA from east coast to west coast), and the radius of the earth being about 10,000 miles, then the sun should be visible all the time from any point on the earth and never set completely, no?

I would understand the sun disappearing (perspective) if the sun was much closer to earth, or of the earth was much larger, but given these proportions, I don't understand.

Thanks!

stevelucas wrote:If the sun is about 3,000 miles away (the length of the USA from east coast to west coast), and the radius of the earth being about 10,000 miles, then the sun should be visible all the time from any point on the earth and never set completely, no?

I would understand the sun disappearing (perspective) if the sun was much closer to earth, or of the earth was much larger, but given these proportions, I don't understand.

Thanks!

I don't understand your false reasoning here. Especially when the density of the atmos is taken into consideration. Light can't keep penetrating through liquid, just look how dark the ocean gets after a few meters. Even with the sun directly beaming down. The atmos is full of dense particles.

I stumbled on this picture and it puzzled me.
How can we explain this, only if at least one of the numbers mentioned here is incorrect?

My explanation would be :

Writing words and numbers in red does not make them factual or true. It's the kids version of the AE contorted representation of the imaginary globe.