Re: Fake Shootings and Other False Flags

by Thinkforyourself Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:00 pm

Post by vamsi108 on 18 hours ago

yesterday at 2:38pm radicaldualist said:
Paris "Terrorist Attack" Hoax - CCTV Footage At Cafe Shows "Terrorist" Sparing Customers Lives

I gave up trying to find some footage of an actual injurious wound , yes there is pictures of people exiting attacked buildings on stretchers or being supported wrapped in blankets or unidentified bodies on the ground at restaurant cafes with some blood around them but not more then one with clear bloodied clothes around a wound . Nevertheless there is no gunshot wounds with blood surrounding them or any evidence of a single injury that has been shown up close? . News report Paris attacks: 129 killed, 352 wounded, 99 in critical condition .There is no footage of survivors in hospitals showing there close calls or the bandages or heaven forbid the wounds themselves .Thank heaven no one seems to have actually been hurt so far . The evidence falsifying this False Flag event has yet to be shown on the contrary motive to attack Syria , Emergency Drills on the same day ( http://thefreethoughtproject.com/paris-emergency-crews-practiced-mass-shooting-simulation-hours-prior-terror-attacks/ ), Convenient evidence drops framing terrorists, Pre existing news reports or tweets before the event , Suspicious footage probably showing shilly crisis actors etc etc etc have all been found .

Despite 352 surviving injured or wounded victims -

by Thinkforyourself Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:01 pm

Post by vamsi108

I think the most relevent false flag event at the moment is the staged attack in france . I am looking to find more clues and leaks by prominent leaders which also continue to elucidate the scam beyond any doubt .Personally I am already convinced as many truthers would be who are familar with false flag events and the standard tactics . So far we have motive which was the bombing of Syria one of the last strongholds holding out against the elite world banking monopolies, all controlled principally by jews . Israel the seat of modern judaism is also looking to expand there territory to dominate anyone who is not already enslaved by there unholy machinations lol. France and most of the modern world we live in, is all in there pocket with controlled media , bought politicians , and huge national debts owned by the central jew bank in switzerland and various other jewish slush funds.

So what are the obvious clues so far, well there is the emergency drills that were performed on the day coinciding with the attack . Obvious passport drops and politically motivated terroist activities of isis members a Syrian muslim regime , which conveniently gives them the justification to go and bomb a city in Syria called Raqqa. - Initial reports from activists on the ground in Raqqa, which could not be verified independently, said that hospitals had not reported any civilian casualties. Yet they also said the targeted sites included clinics, a museum and other buildings in an urban area, leaving the full extent of the damage unknown. www.nytimes.com/2015/11/16/world/europe/paris-terror-attack.html?_r=0

So Surprisingly i have seen little footage of the victims or inside the theatre (cell ph pics or videos ) considering there was supposedly 1000 people inside you would think someone managed to get something. Maybe they learnt there lesson staging the boston bombing by botching it with amputee actors fake blood , crappy actors etc etc etc to convince the world of its authenticity !!!!

What footage we have seems to have alot of people casually strolling around ! Where is the urgency of a crisis involving mortally wounded people who are on the verge of death and people in shock trying to frantically tend to them . You would think there would be hysterical tears and gut wrenching wails or ear splittings screams of agony . In reality you hear a bunch of crappy staged actors moaning as randoms wander around aimlessly, while the others tending to so called wounded people, are looking at each other for cues on how there suppose to be acting and not quite sure if anyone really knows how to pretend there was a fake terrorist attack !

by Thinkforyourself Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:02 pm

Post by vamsi108

found this pretty nonchalant testimony for someone who survived a terrorist attack and nicked by a bullet in the elbow . He just had a near death experience where over a hundred people died and his voice hardly becomes raised or agitated by the inhumanity, injustice and terror he would have experienced . Hmmm no that seems more like the testimony of someone who just attended a peaceful protest against logging in a beautiful rainforest , was disappointed by the fact they were rounded up and taken away by police for resisting arrest and couldn't save the trees .

(video removed)

How about the body language notice how he covered up his face and mumbled abit when he mentioned being shot in the elbow . For someone who has been shot in the elbow he doesnt appear to be showing many signs of pain or immobility in his arm . If its superficial or not that bad why can't he show us the wound I guess he doesnt want to disturb that terrible wound, fair enough he is suffering enough . After all if he is complicit to a false attack he will have to carry that for the rest of his life .

OMG look its happening again there just shrugging and dispassionately giving accounts of being in a near death terrorist attack . I definitely am seeing a pattern forming here .

I am gonna go out on a limb and suggest these witnesses have degrees in media communication and have jobs with covert govt agencies or they are members of a anti muslim activist group who signed waivers promising secrecy . Speculation yes,nevertheless its my best bet based on previous false flag research .

This girl does seem genuinely disturbed its possible that not everybody was in on it and some innocent bystanders where actually traumatised . Its early days lets see...

PS after a little more investigation I am finding claims that Dr Louise Hefez interviewed above is being hailed as a saviour who helped treat victims , Although she doesn't claim to have really saved anyone only tried to perform cardiac massage to reanimate a young man but failed and his body was taken away by firemen .Well if the deaths were staged and she is a doctor I doubt she would have been fooled by actors pretending to die , as a educated doctor you would think her grasp of english is competent enough to correctly say resuscitation rather then reanimate as well . Could it be her distress is a symptom of her guilt at being part of such a big hoax ?

by Thinkforyourself Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:02 pm

Post by radicaldualist

by Thinkforyourself Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:04 pm

Post by thinkforyourself on Nov 16, 2015 at 3:27pm

Great post. He describes the situation very well. One thing that I must point out is that he is also most likely controlled opposition, because he is defending Orban of Hungary, and making him seem like a genuine anti-immigrant campaigner, when in reality, Orban won a scholarship from George Soros, and he is obviously a NWO puppet.

by Thinkforyourself Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:04 pm

Post by radicaldualist

I agree 100%, also considering the interview was broadcasted by RT. He barely mentions Israel or the banksters, and supports Orban yes, controlled opposition, still good to spread around to sheeple

by Thinkforyourself Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:04 pm

Post by vamsi108

It does seem a bit naff that he seems to be so enlightened when it comes to the actual reality of world dynamics, yet he is saying its America who is controlling France ? Could it be that he doesn't want to be censored for saying anything antisemetic, so he has a choice of saying the almost truth or risking an attack by the insidious tendrils of a jewish manipulated world, that is like a cancer waiting to attack any healthy cell of opposition .

by Thinkforyourself Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:04 pm

Post by schpankme

It's strange for the guest speaker to know all the dirty secrets of State controlled Terrorism, yet he
didn't know it was a False Flag perpetrated by Crisis Actors.

by Thinkforyourself Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:05 pm

Post by vamsi108

Ok there starting to roll in another coincidence that seems a bit much to swallow . Man near bomb blast , saved from shrapnel by his cellphone is interviewed by the news crew, who accidentally just happened to be there at that time ? He shows a bit of blood on his shirt which does look a bit like grape juice ( again we see no actual wound just a claim of injury ).

by Thinkforyourself Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:05 pm

Post by thinkforyourself

Nov 16, 2015 at 4:15pm schpankme said:
It's strange for the guest speaker to know all the dirty secrets of State controlled Terrorism, yet he
didn't know it was a False Flag perpetrated by Crisis Actors.

Exactly; well said. What he didn't say was just as important as what he did say; yet again, he failed to mention the involvement of the Zionists.

by Thinkforyourself Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:06 pm

Post by thinkforyourself on Nov 16, 2015 at 4:30pm

Nov 16, 2015 at 4:25pm vamsi108 said:
Ok there starting to roll in another coincidence that seems a bit much to swallow . Man near bomb blast , saved from shrapnel by his cellphone is interviewed by the news crew, who accidentally just happened to be there at that time ? He shows a bit of blood on his shirt which does look a bit like grape juice ( again we see no actual wound just a claim of injury ).

Thanks for posting. That has got to be one of the most ridiculous videos that I have ever seen, and it is hilarious that he accidentally admits that the press were already at the scene. How could he be bleeding when there is no hole in his T-shirt?

It is good to know that French crises actor's are just as bad as American ones.

by Thinkforyourself Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:06 pm

Post by vamsi108 on Nov 16, 2015 at 4:48pm

Is this a clue - that Alex Jones who is known controlled opposition is now inciting fear porn, by revealing the history of the theatre where the attacks took place was previously a place where the knights templar were rounded up and killed on fri the 13th.Isn't it convenient that he always has a novel connection, by which he is always trying to blame the catholic church and throw everyone off the jew masonic cabal (of which the catholic church is only one branch) .If you want to avoid his near false flag rhetoric and jump to the claims he makes you can goto 9min 30 sec on the video and see his profound controlled opposition insights lol.

by Thinkforyourself Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:07 pm

Post by susie

And the stupidity laws had already been proposed. Hold onto your rights boys and girls they are stealing them like usury fees.
www.globalresearch.ca/france-moves-to-make-conspiracy-theories-illegal-by-government-decree/5438970

France Moves to Make ‘Conspiracy Theories’ Illegal by Government Decree

21st Century Wire — March 19, 2015

A history stitched together by lies and cover-ups, political assassinations, slight-of-hand false flag deceptions, secret societies, dual loyalties and stolen fortunes – this has been the exclusive privilege of organized crime and the ruling elite for centuries.

Putting aside history’s ‘big ticket’ items though, the real reason for this authoritarian trend is much more fundamental. By knocking out their intellectual competition, political elites and their media moguls hope to minimalize, and thus eliminate any alternative analysis and opinion by applying the completely open-ended and arbitrary label of “extremist” to speech. They want to wind back the clock, where a pre-internet, monolithic corporate media cartel held a monopoly on ideas.

Although France has taken the lead in this inter-governmental effort (see below), the preliminary assault began this past fall with British Prime Minster David Cameron publicly announcing on two separate occasions, that all of these so-called ‘conspiracy theories’ (anything which challenges the official orthodoxy) should be deemed as “extremist” and equivalent to “terrorist” and should be purged from society on the grounds of ‘national security’. The first came with Cameron’s warped speech at the UN, and afterwards, a similar charge was made by the UK leader against anyone who dares press the issue of institutional paedophilia and child abuse.

Watch this UN speech by Cameron where he clearly claims that ‘conspiracy theorists’ are the ‘root cause’ and indeed, an equal threat to national security as ISIS terrorists currently running amok in Syria and Iraq…

As yet, few are aware of how in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo shootings, French Prime Minster, Francois Hollande delivered an official declaration (see full report and text from his speech below). However, Hollande takes it beyond the usual hyperbole and focuses on giving the state an administrative and legal foothold for policing both speech and thought crimes in France. If this can be accomplished in France, then a European roll-out would soon follow.

Ironically, in order to achieve this fascist leap forward, Hollande has equated “conspiracy theories” to Nazism, and is calling for government regulations to prevent any sharing or publishing of any views deemed as ‘dangerous thought’ by the state. Specifically, Hollande is citing “Anti-Semitism” and also anything which could inspire ‘acts terrorism’ – as the chief vehicles for what the state will be designating as ‘dangerous thoughts’. With the thumb of Hebdo still pressing down, this may just sound like politics writ large by the French leader, but in reality it’s full-blown fascism.

Fake Shootings and Other False Flags - Page 4 World-leaders-join-rally.-Includin-Israeli-Prime-Minister-Netanyahu-Malia-President-Boubacar-Keita-German-Chancellor-Angela-Merkel-and-Palestinian-President-Abbas

Fake Shootings and Other False Flags - Page 4 World-leaders-join-rally.-Includin-Israeli-Prime-Minister-Netanyahu-Malia-President-Boubacar-Keita-German-Chancellor-Angela-Merkel-and-Palestinian-President-Abbas

French President Francois Hollande is surrounded by head of states including (L to R) Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Mali's President Ibrahim Boubacar Keita, Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel, European Council President Donald Tusk and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas as they attend the solidarity march (Marche Republicaine) in the streets of Paris January 11, 2015. REUTERS/Philippe Wojazer
French President Francois Hollande is surrounded by head of states including (L to R) Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Mali’s President Ibrahim Boubacar Keita, Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel, European Council President Donald Tusk and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas as they attend the solidarity march (Marche Republicaine) in the streets of Paris January 11, 2015. REUTERS/Philippe Wojazer

Worse yet, with all of the world leaders gathered togther in Paris in January supposedly marching solidarity for ‘free speech’ and proudly chanting “Je Suis Charlie” (image above), that Hollande would use this as political cover to restrict free speech in Europe should shock even.

RINF reports how the new censorship regime has already been implemented this week:

“Earlier this week, the Interior Minister of France — with no court review or adversarial process — ordered five websites to not only be blocked in France, but that anyone who visits any of the sites get redirected to a scary looking government website, saying:
Fake Shootings and Other False Flags - Page 4 France-Internet-Censorship

Fake Shootings and Other False Flags - Page 4 France-Internet-Censorship

While it could be argued that the four websites initially listed by the government for ‘blocking’ were exclusively for ISIS/ISIL-related activity and thus, should be kept hidden, the government has made no caveat in its reams of policy literature, other than some vague language as to what it defines as ‘extremist’, as to where this growing list will stop, or indeed, if it has any limits at all. Because this process is extrajudicial, then there will be no warning to gov’t targets of this new regime. In fact, as RINF reports, this has already happened:

“In that first batch was a site called “islamic-news.info.” The owner of that site not only notes that he was never first contacted to “remove” whatever material was deemed terrorist supporting (as required by the law), but that nothing in what he had posted was supporting terrorism.”

Will French gov’t censors also block this website – because it is challenging the government’s new public filtering program? Are we entering a new intolerant, Chinese-style policing culture in Europe, and throughout the west? Certainly they have the ability and the legal clearance to do just that right now.

Fear of losing control over manipulative narratives has always been a primary obsession with those in power, and clearly, based on what we’ve seen here – governments are making an aggressive move on free speech now. Skeptics will no doubt argue that this 21WIRE article itself constitutes a conspiracy theory. If that was the case, then why have western governments, particularly those in the US and Britain, already spent millions, if not billions in state funds in order to infiltrate, disrupt, and occupy forum websites, and social networking groups of so-called ‘conspiracy theorist and even creating entirely new groups just to contradict them? Does that not already prove what the government modus operandi is?

As if that wasn’t enough already, now France wants to take it to a whole new authoritarian level. It may sound ridiculous, but this is exactly what is taking place in government as we speak.

History shows that once this new regime is in place, they will not relinquish any new powers of censorship, and so a long, intellectual dark age is certain to follow…
Fake Shootings and Other False Flags - Page 4 French-President-Francois-Hollande-shakes-hands-with-the-Emire-of-Qatar

Fake Shootings and Other False Flags - Page 4 French-President-Francois-Hollande-shakes-hands-with-the-Emire-of-Qatar

www.voltairenet.org/article187030.html

The State Against The Republic
by Thierry Meyssan
At the request of President François Hollande, the French Socialist Party has published a note on the international “conspiracy theorist" movement. His goal: to prepare new legislation prohibiting it to express itself. In the US, the September 11, 2001 coup established a "permanent state of emergency" (Patriot Act), launching a series of imperial wars. Gradually, the European elites have aligned with their counterparts across the Atlantic. Everywhere, people are worried about being abandoned by their States and they question their institutions. Seeking to retain power, the elites are now ready to use force to gag their opposition.

VOLTAIRE NETWORK | DAMASCUS (SYRIA) | 13 MARCH 2015

www.voltairenet.org/local/cache-vignettes/L400xH300/1-5184-0b948-ed4fd.jpg

JPEG - 22.5 kb
January 27, 2015, President François Hollande made "conspiracy theorists" responsible for the crimes committed by the Nazis against the Jews of Europe. He called for a ban on their freedom of expression.
The President of the French Republic, François Hollande, has assimilated what he calls "conspiracy theories" to Nazism and called to prevent their dissemination on the Internet and social networks.
Thus he declared, on January 27, 2015 at the Shoah Memorial:
"[Anti-Semitism] maintains conspiracy theories that spread without limits. Conspiracy theories that have, in the past, led to the worst "(...)" [The] answer is to realize that conspiracy theories are disseminated through the Internet and social networks. Moreover, we must remember that it is words that have in the past prepared extermination. We need to act at the European level, and even internationally, so that a legal framework can be defined, and so that Internet platforms that manage social networks are held to account and that sanctions be imposed for failure to enforce" [1].
Several ministers also decried what they called conspiracy theorists as so many "fermenters of hate and disintegrators of society."
Knowing that President Hollande calls "conspiracy theory" the idea that States, whatever their regimes - including democracies - have a spontaneous tendency to act in their own interests and not in that of their constituents, we can conclude that he presented this confused amalgam to justify a possible censure of his opponents.
This interpretation is confirmed by the publication of a note entitled "Conspiracy theories, current status" by the Jean-Jaurès Foundation, a Socialist Party think tank of which Mr. Holland was the first secretary. [2]
Let’s leave aside the political relations of François Hollande, the Socialist Party, the Fondation Jean-Jaurès, its political radicalism Observatory and the author of the note and let’s focus on its message and its ideological content.
Definition of "conspiracy theories"

The terms "conspiracy theories" and "conspiracy theorism" have developed in France in the wake of the publication of my book on US imperialism post-September 11, titled The Big Lie [3]. At the time, we had trouble understanding what the terms meant because they referred to American political history. In the United States, are commonly called "conspiracy theorists" those according to whom President Kennedy had not been assassinated by one man but by many, forming a conspiracy (in the judicial sense). Over time, these expressions entered in the French language and have overlapped with memories of the 30s and the Second World War, those of the denunciation of the "Jewish conspiracy". These are therefore now polysemous, sometimes evoking the law of the state-Stator silence and, at other times, European anti-Semitism.
In its note, the Jean-Jaurès Foundation gives its own definition of conspiracy theorism. It is
"an ’alternative’ narrative that claims to significantly upset the knowledge we have of an event and therefore competes with the "version" which is commonly accepted, stigmatized as "official"" (p. 2).
Observe that this definition does not apply solely to the delusions of the mentally ill. Thus, Socrates, through the myth of the cave, affirmed his challenge to the certainties of his time; Galileo with his heliocentric theory challenged the prevailing interpretation of the Bible of his time; etc.
For my part, and since they see me as the "pope of conspiracy theorists" or rather the "heretic" in the words of Italian philosopher Roberto Quaglia, I reaffirm my radical political commitment, in keeping with the French republican radicalism of Leon Bourgeois [4], of Georges Clemenceau, [5] of Alain [6] and of Jean Moulin. [7] For me, as for them, the state is a Leviathan which by nature abuses those it governs.
As a radical Republican, I am aware that the state is the enemy of the common good, of the Res Publica; which is why I wish not to abrogate it, but to tame it. The republican ideal is compatible with various political regimes-including monarchies, as was enacted by the authors of the Declaration of 1789.
This opposition, which the current Socialist Party disputes, has so shaped our history as Philippe Pétain repealed the Republic to proclaim the "French State". Immediately after his assuming presidential office, I denounced Hollande’s Petainism [8]. Today, Mr. Hollande claims to be of the Republic to better fight it and this inversion of values plunges the country into confusion.
Who are the "conspiracy theorists"?

The "conspiracy theorists" are thus citizens who oppose the omnipotence of the State and who wish to place it under surveillance.
The Jean-Jaurès Foundation describes them as follows:
"[It’s] a heterogeneous movement, heavily entangled with the Holocaust denial movement, and which combines admirers of Hugo Chavez and fans of Vladimir Putin. An underworld that consist of former left-wing activists or extreme leftists, former "malcontents", sovereignists, revolutionary nationalists, ultra-nationalists, nostalgists of the Third Reich, anti-vaccination activists, supporters of drawing straws, September 11th revisionists, anti-Zionists, Afrocentricists, survivalists, followers of "alternative medicine", agents of influence of the Iranian regime, Bacharists, Catholic or Islamic fundamentalists "(p. Cool

.
One will note the amalgams and abuse of this description aiming to discredit those it designates.
Myths of the "conspiracy theorists"

The Jean-Jaurès Foundation continues its vilification by accusing "conspiracy theorists" of ignoring the realities of the world and naively believing hackneyed myths. Thus, they would believe in the "World Zionist plot", the "illuminati conspiracy" and the "Rothschild myth" (p. 4). And to credit these three statements, it cites an example solely on the "Rothschild myth": blogger Etienne Chouard - whose work is not simply about the Republic, but goes beyond to treat Democracy [9] - says the Pompidou-Rothschild 1973 law is the source of the debt of France. And the Foundation goes on to refute this assertion by quoting an article published by Libération.
One will note here that the example of Étienne Chouard leaves one unsatisfied about the two other cited myths. Especially, the Foundation addresses ignorant people who have neither read the response from Mr. Chouard to Libération [10] nor the contribution of the "conspiracy theorist", former Prime minister Michel Rocard. [11] Indeed, in this debate, it is clear that the 1973 law allowed the explosion of the French debt in favor of private banks, which would have been impossible before.
The "conspirasphere"

For the Fondation Jean-Jaurès, conspiracy intellectuals would be
"essentially North Americans. Particular mention is made of Webster Tarpley and William Engdhal (both former members of the US political-sectarian organization led by Lyndon LaRouche), Wayne Madsen (WayneMadsenReport.com), Kevin Barrett (VeteransToday.com) or Michel Chossudovsky (Mondialisation.ca ). With their European counterparts, they form a kind of International to which Thierry Meyssan, president of Voltaire Network, tried to give concrete form in November 2005 in Brussels, bringing together an "anti-imperialist conference" - "Axis for Peace "- the list of participants of which reads like a who’s who of conspiracy authors most prominent at the time" (p. Cool

.
First, let’s observe that the Fondation Jean-Jaurès must only read in French and English, and have barely skimmed over the participants’ lists of Axis for Peace, to believe that the phenomenon it describes only concerns France, Canada and the United States. In fact it includes a very large literature in Arabic, Spanish, Persian and Russian; languages which are also in the majority in Axis for Peace.
Let’s note also the malicious nature of the reference to "the politico-sectarian American organization led by Lyndon LaRouche." Indeed, William Webster Tarpley and Engdhal quit this organization more than 20 years ago. And at the time when they were members, this party was represented in France at an extreme-left organization’s congress.
A little further on, the Jean-Jaurès Foundation does not fail to mention the comedian Dieudonné M’Bala M’Bala, whose shows the State seeks to prohibit, the sociologist Alain Soral, whose website (EgaliteEtReconciliation.fr ) obtains audience records in France, and Alain Benajam (facebook.com/alain.benajam), chairman of Voltaire Network France and representative of the Novorossian Government of Donbass.
Fake Shootings and Other False Flags - Page 4 2-138-5f55d-25330

Fake Shootings and Other False Flags - Page 4 2-138-5f55d-25330

JPEG - 15.5 kb
In 1989, the former head of US intelligence in Europe, Irving Brown, revealed to reporters Roger Faligot and Rémi Kauffer that he had recruited Jean-Christophe Cambadélis when he militated in Lambertists Trotskyists. 25 years later, Mr. Cambadélis became First Secretary of the French Socialist Party.
The political ideas of "conspiracy theorists"

After these appetizers, the Fondation Jean-Jaurès comes to the heart of the debate, that of political ideas. It defines those of the "conspiracy theorists" thus:

- "the erasure of any distinction in kind between liberal democracies and authoritarian regimes (deemed more “totalitarian" than the worst of totalitarianism)”;
- "[Opposition to] any anti-racist legislation under the pretext of defending "freedom of expression";
- "[Rejection of] the relevance of the left-right divide, the real divide is the one between" the system "(or" Empire "or the" oligarchy ") and those who resist it"; (P. Cool

- "the idea that Zionism is a project of world domination" (p. 9).
The Jean-Jaurès Foundation specifically targets areas of conflict, but exaggerates to discredit its opponents. For example, no one is opposed to all anti-racism legislation, but only and exclusively to the Fabius-Gayssot law that punishes by imprisonment any debate about the extermination of the Jews of Europe [12].
What is Zionism?

The Foundation then engages in a very long analysis of my works on Zionism. It disfigures them, then comments:
"Thierry Meyssan’s anti-Zionism bears no resemblance to the criticism of a situation, that of the governments that have been able to succeed each other at the head of the State of Israel. It does not arise from an anti-colonialism that would be resolved by Israel’s withdrawal from the territories occupied after the Six Day War and the creation of a Palestinian state. It also does not proceed from an internationalism that would hold in suspicion, in principle, any national movement wherever it comes from, precisely because it does not liken Zionism to a national movement. This paranoid anti-Zionism does not pretend to fight Zionism in the diversity of its historical expressions, but as a fantastic hydra that is the source of evil in the world. "
In wanting to conclude this debate by giving it considerable space in its analysis, the Jean Jaurès Foundation highlights its importance. I indeed defend a position thus far absent in the Western political debate [13]:
- The first head of state who stated his intention to bring together Jews from around the world in a state that would be theirs was Lord Cromwell in the seventeenth century. His project, clearly explained, was to use the Jewish diaspora to expand English hegemony. This project has been defended by all successive British governments and registered by Benjamin Disraeli in the agenda of the Berlin Conference.
- Theodor Herzl himself was a disciple of Cecil Rhodes, the theorist of the British Empire. Herzl originally proposed to create Israel in Uganda or Argentina, not in Palestine. When he succeeded in having Jewish activists adhere to the British project, he bought land in Palestine by creating the Jewish Agency whose articles are a carbon copy of the Rhodes society in Southern Africa.
- In 1916-17, the United Kingdom and the United States reconciled themselves by committing together to create the state of Israel through the Balfour Declaration in London and Wilson’s 14 points in Washington.
It is therefore perfectly absurd to claim that Herzl invented Zionism, to separate the Zionist project from British colonialism, and to deny that the State of Israel is a tool of the common imperial project in London and Washington.
The position of the Parti socialiste on this subject is not innocent. In 1936 it proposed with Léon Blum to create the state of Israel on the territory of the Lebanon mandate [14]. However the project was quickly dismissed because of the opposition of the French High Commissioner in Beirut, Damien de Martel de Janville.
Concluding remarks

In 2008, Professor Cass Sunstein, an adviser to President Barack Obama and husband of the US Ambassador to the UN, had written a similar note [15].
He wrote:
"We can easily imagine a series of possible answers.
- 1. The government can ban conspiracy theories.
- 2. The government could impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories.
- 3. The government could engage in a contrary discourse to discredit conspiracy theories.
- 4. The government could initiate credible private parties to engage in a discourse against conspiracy theories.
- 5. The government could engage in informal communication with third parties and encourage them. "
Ultimately, the US government had decided to fund individuals, both at home and abroad, to disrupt the forum websites of conspiracy theorists and to create groups to contradict them.
This not having sufficed, France is called upon to take authoritarian measures. As in the past, the French elites, of which the Socialist Party forms the pseudo-left wing, have placed themselves under the orders of the main military power of the time, in this case, the US.
Let’s not be naive, we are approaching an inevitable showdown. It remains to be determined which instance, necessarily administrative, will be in charge of censorship and what will be its criteria.
Thierry Meyssan
Translation
Roger Lagassé
www.voltairenet.org/article187030.html

by Thinkforyourself Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:08 pm

Post by biggambler on Nov 16, 2015 at 6:14pm

The thing about RT and other controlled opposition media is they actually put real effort in their propaganda.

Something like CNN and FOX is disgustingly obvious, I'm not sure why anyone would fall for it.

by Thinkforyourself Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:08 pm

Post by iahawks on Nov 16, 2015 at 11:25pm

If I were to go up to someone who swallows every piece of media trash that is put in front of him, and said, "Hey! Nobody died in this supposed shooting... Isn't that great news?!?!", that person would argue tooth and nail for his position that people actually did die. How twisted is that?

Plus, a friend of mine made a good observation about the Paris "attack": He said that during NFL football games on Sunday here in the U.S. there were Paris light shows and displays (you know, with the three colors that they have going on Facebook profiles and such) that probably would have taken much longer than 48 hours to set up; in other words, it was already known the "attack" was coming.

by Thinkforyourself Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:09 pm

Post by schpankme on Nov 16, 2015 at 11:55pm

Facebook Broadens 'Safety Check' Feature After Paris Attacks

"Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said that the social network will make more frequent use of its
"Safety Check" tool after the terrorist attacks in Paris on Friday."

Facebook introduced 'Safety Check' in 2011, the next morning, after the Japanese tsunami and
Fukushima nuclear incident.

Are you OK during the false flag? kk thx

by lizardking Wed Jan 20, 2016 8:10 pm

Terror From Within (1995 Oklahoma Bombing Documentary)

Waco - A New Revelation (2011 New Documentary)

WACO: The Big Lie

by lizardking Thu Jan 28, 2016 3:53 pm

by iahawks Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:08 pm

Thinkforyourself wrote:Post by schpankme on Nov 16, 2015 at 11:55pm

"Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said that the social network will make more frequent use of its
"Safety Check" tool after the terrorist attacks in Paris on Friday."

Thank Goodness for the Facebook "Safety Check"!!! I was wondering why I was feeling so safe lately...

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:04 pm

Posted by kostas on 05/02/2015

How to Avoid Becoming a Patsy like Dzhokar Tsarnaev:

An increasingly common hazard of modern life is finding that you have been blamed for a CIA false flag.

These practical steps will help you to avoid this predicament, everyone's worst nightmare.

by lizardking Tue Mar 08, 2016 7:44 pm

by csp Thu Mar 10, 2016 3:54 am

EAGLES of Death Metal frontman Jesse Hughes has sensationally suggested security guards at the Bataclan theatre may have been in on the Paris attacks.

Speaking about the massacre of 90 people during the band’s concert last November, Hughes said he was suspicious of the guards’ behaviour before the gig, The Sun reports.
He claims to have requested one guard be taken off duty due to his odd behaviour and said another six simply failed to show up for work on the night.
During an interview with the FOX Business Network’s Kennedy, Hughes, said: “When I first got to the venue and walked in, I walked past the dude who was supposed to be the security guard for the backstage. He didn’t even look at me.”
“I immediately went to the promoter and said, ‘Who’s that guy? I want to put another dude on’, and he goes, ‘Well some of the other guards aren’t here yet’,”.

“Eventually I found out that six or so wouldn’t show up at all,” he added.
Hughes said he wouldn’t make a definitive statement out of respect for the police investigation but said, “It seems rather obvious they had a reason not to show up.”

http://www.news.com.au/world/europe/eagles-of-death-metal-singer-jesse-hughes-suggests-bataclan-security-may-have-been-in-on-paris-attacks/news-story/95c3ac56ef148a5cdce746bbcbd0698a

by George Tirebiter Thu Mar 10, 2016 6:54 pm

by mitch Fri Mar 11, 2016 1:30 pm

Bataclan slams “insane” Eagles of Death Metal for “grave, defamatory” Paris conspiracy remarks BY SCOTT WILSON, MAR 11 2016

“Hundreds of people were saved thanks to (these agents’) intervention.”

The owners of the Bataclan venue have condemned Eagles of Death Metal frontman Jesse Hughes’s suggestion that some members of security “had a reason not to show up” on the night of last year’s Paris terror attacks.

In a statement to Variety, a Bataclan representative called Hughes’s claims “insane,” saying: “Jesse Hughes spread some very grave and defamatory accusations against the Bataclan teams.

“A judicial investigation is undergoing. We wish to let justice proceed serenely. All the testimonies gathered to this day demonstrate the professionalism and courage of the security agents who were on the ground on November 13. Hundreds of people were saved thanks to (these agents’) intervention.”

Hughes made the remarks in an interview with Fox Business Network broadcast yesterday (March 10), where he appeared to hint that he believes “six or seven” workers failed to turn up to the gig because they may have known an attack was imminent.

“When I first got to the venue and walked in, I walked past the dude who was supposed to be the security guard for the backstage,” Hughes said.

“He didn’t even look at me. I immediately went to the promoter and said, ‘Who’s that guy? I want to put another dude on.’ He said, ‘Well, some of the other guards aren’t here yet.’ And eventually, I found out that six or so wouldn’t show up at all.”

“Out of respect for the police still investigating, I won’t make a definite statement, but I’ll say that it seems like they had a reason not to show up.”

Hughes was playing with the Eagles of Death Metal at the venue on November 13, where 89 people were killed in a terrorist attack.

The frontman said last month that he believed more people may have survived the attack had the been legally allowed to carry guns.

“I know people will disagree with me, but it just seems like God made men and women, and that night guns made them equal.”

by Sponsored content