Questions About the Flat Earth

Interaction between ionised gases of the upper atmosphere with earths torroidal magnetic field

Thank you, I have seen this as one explanation.

adamb1 wrote:Hello everybody, can anyone please give me an idea how to explain the aurora on flat earth, even if the idea seem meaningless I can always develop on it.
Globists keep pointing at this phenomenon.
I have a couple of ideas but I am not sure, any help would be appreciated.
Many thanks

what a surprise people point to the sky when were asking for proof the ground is curved or spherical.



Space balls are meant to carry us away into fantasy land where we have no firm footing on reality and have everyone rely on the system controlled by jews

what a surprise people point to the sky when were asking for proof the ground is curved or spherical.



Space balls are meant to carry us away into fantasy land where we have no firm footing on reality and have everyone rely on the system controlled by jews[/quote]

That is precisely what they've been doing for centuries, the one thing that goes for them, is that they never give up and never are discouraged, when they fail and come back whilst the majority of humanity fell asleep for a long time.
Of all the major conspiracies by far this is the biggest, the mother of all, even bigger than evolution.

The truth does not care about your feelings.
I am tired of trying to wake people up, and I cannot thank Eric Dubay enough for the journey he has brought me on. If someone cannot appreciate the research he and other truthseekers have collected, then they do not deserve to know it.
It sounds like you are trying to dumb down the rhetoric for people so the sheeple might understand, but the most important way to get through to someone is by word of mouth; not via a biased algorithm that filters videos and proposes stupid cat videos and pornography on the daily.
Without sounding too curt, there is ignorance and then there is nescience. Nescience can be summarised as the Absence of knowledge or awareness;
Ignorance is what people do daily, and I am sure you know the definition.
When you siphon through The Atlantean Conspiracy, Adolf Hitler vs The Jew World Order, Flatlantis, The Science of Spirituality you realise these are topics which unfortunately only show a glimpse of the real truth, as important as they are.
If something is censored, why bother trying to tiptoe around their agenda and play nice guy when they definitely are not doing the same.
On second thought I am doubting lending you any credence because I realise you just joined today and are either extremely naive or an agent.
Peace

May I just relate an experience of this morning....

So the Evergiven that rammed itself into the most inconvenient part of the Suez (c)anal followed a course that traced out a cock and balls about to enter a butt, as verified through ship trackers just prior.

Talking to my wife this morning I could NOT BELIEVE how she tried to normalise or excuse and avoid ANY possibility that this was odd at least. F*CK F*CK F*CK.

The plan is to eliminate ALL humans (the 'whos' are going too) and replace them with androgynes, born into artificial wombs (already avaliable, or near enough).

If only so much had not been hidden or distorted. If only we knew even a little of our true history. if only we knew the true nature of our repeating presence here AND who or what is is that has managed to destroy what we should be.

I'm sad.

What do you do when everyone around you is sound asleep and unshakably so?

adamb1 wrote:Hello everybody, can anyone please give me an idea how to explain the aurora on flat earth, even if the idea seem meaningless I can always develop on it.
Globists keep pointing at this phenomenon.
I have a couple of ideas but I am not sure, any help would be appreciated.
Many thanks

Hi Adam!
I don’t know what causes the aurora borealis, good question. I’ve been curious about this too. Could be magnetic something going on. Seems like it probably has something to do with the poles. Maybe there’s some sort of energy field pouring out from the North Pole. I’ve heard theories it’ could be magical or spiritual in nature. To me I think what these northern lights invoke is mystery. It’s very materialistic for us to want to have to have an answer for everything right away. And that’s ok (I’m my opinion) because we are partially material (in my opinion), But it’s also ok to just not know. And this inspires me to want to find out. It’s adventurous and it invokes an excitement in our hearts. And the energy to create an expedition to go explore the north pole and find out. Unfortunately our society has become so lazy we just want a quick google answer for everything. I’m included, I wish I was raised stronger but I’m learning again to explore and seek out the answers to these mysteries in a true hope to find answers rather than as ammunition for an argument against “globies”.


Of course we aren’t able to actually go to the North Pole (yet!), but even in our internet searches we can try to have a spirit of adventure and revel in some mystery. And to be fair, I don’t know what shape the entire earth is, and I don’t think very many people do, but I’m slowly building a more truthful picture of reality, and it’s a lot closer to a plane than a ball.


Let me know if you find some more info on the northern lights

You are right, however with most globists one need to have answers otherwise they think they're right, of course we can show 100 things that aren't working on a globe model, one of them is the alleged 93M miles distance to the sun, which the 2017 eclipse has debunked.

The Lunar eclipse is another thing that debunks the globe and a distant sun.
We can go on and on, but as I said, I just asked in case someone has an idea, yes I have heard of many theories.
I also accept the fact that we may never know the truth, and it is bloody frustrating lol.
If I learn anything I will share it here I promise.

Yeah, good points. I’ll be on the lookout for some answers. I am curious too. And it would help further define a working model. I think I was mostly getting a little philosophical.

Speaking of ways to further define/prove the flat earth theory, or atleast gain more knowledge, I was trying to think of a few experiments we could do that would wake people up with results (assuming they turned out to prove FE, either way they would be good)

1. Sail a private ship from South America to Australia and record the time it takes and speed you were traveling. It should take far longer on a FE map. Are there any cruises that go this route?

2. Balloon at night filming UP to see if the stars disappear when you reach a certain height.

3. Drone balloon to the North Pole (to see if something’s there)

4. Drone ship to South Pole. Maybe solar powered. Maybe blimp solar powered. It doesn’t need to be fast.

5. Boats out in the ocean watching when the NASA rockets take off to see where they go. Supposedly this is the Bermuda Triangle so if no one wanted to go they could do a drone-ship recording it.

6. Send a homemade rocket into space. Find out what the smallest rocket to be able to enter space was and build one this small. It doesn’t need to enter orbit, just reach space, or high enough to be able to show earth curvature, therefore it could be smaller than most rockets I believe.

7. Build a real free energy device. Set it up for people to come see it, and live stream it. Prove that it works. (Personals, I’m skeptical of these claims until shown, but happy to be proven wrong). One that comes to mind is how often people claim these high spires on tops of buildings are actually designed to tap into a free energy of the aether. That sounds cool, but if someone is so sure of this can they make one? I’ve read there is electric charge in the air the higher you go up, as a scientific fact (David Weiss often says this). Ok, so is this electric charge enough to power things or not? If it is build oneand save the planet. If it’s not then it’s not. If you don’t know then why do you keep saying there is “free energy” in the air? If you’re just saying let’s explore free energy, we’ll I’m with you there.

8. Enough curvature proofs. I think we got that. It’s time to move on to other proofs.

9. Prove thrust is impossible in a vacuum with a physical demonstration. Film it. Some problems though are I’m not sure a vaccuum is totally possible on earth.

10. Independent map measurements to see if our maps are accurate

11. Circumnavigate the Antarctic with dozens of small drone ships, keeping the shoreline in view at all times. They may stop a few of these but they’ll likely miss a few. See how far around it is.

That’s what I got so far for ideas. The problem is all these take money. But if there are any flat earthers who want to fund these we could do it maybe.

9. The principle that no work is done when a pressurised gas is released into a vacuum is well known .
No work done = no reactive force of thrust. Physically demonstrated in James Joules' scientific experiment over 150 years ago.

10. I would imagine land maps would be pretty accurate since surveys use triangulation. Don't know about the seas and oceans though.

Hi There

My question is, anybody know about that any of computer flight simulators or pc games calculate with the earth curvature or the corriolis effect?
Thanks for your help!

Any thoughts on this video below? I searched the forum but didn't found it so I thought to ask here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaPa4esJJx4

The flat earth argument I’ve heard is that this mistakenly assumes the sun rays are hitting the earth parallel. However, the flat earth model has the sun rays hitting the earth at angles (because the sun is small and relatively close). And so the sun rays splay off at more obvious angles from it. And this makes sense; evreytime I look at the sun the light rays seem to be shining out at angels. Cupuscular rays also show sun rays hitting the earth at angels.

Basically this experiment does not prove the earth is flat or round. Both flat earthers and globers would expect these same results. Though, it does seem to make more sense on a flat earth sense it also matches curpuscular rays.

As a strange coincidence; his measurement is 66.1. cm. If it were 66.6 that would be really odd. However, when he tells us his number he says it is “sixty six cent-...” (and then he fumbles and repeats himself, saying) “66.1 centimeters..” so, he actually verbally says 66 “cent-“ 66.1... that’s technically four “6s” in a row. maybe just coincidence, but I always try to take note of these numbers when they come up because it could be a shout-out or synchronicity.

A century after Aristotle, around 250 B.C. yet another Greek mathematician and philosopher named Eratosthenes made his claim to fame with a new alleged proof of the spherical Earth. Eratosthenes noted that at noon during the Summer Solstice in Syene, the Sun cast no shadow and the rays could reach straight to the bottom of his well, yet meanwhile in Alexandria a vertically standing metal rod cast a significant shadow. By factoring the length of the shadow with his assumed distance to the Sun, Eratosthenes recorded a measurement of Earth’s circumference close to what heliocentrist astronomers still use today. The fact of the matter is, however, that Eratosthenes’ calculations were made assuming the Sun to be millions of miles away so that its rays would fall perfectly parallel even in points as divergent as Syene and Alexandria. This faulty premise led to his faulty conclusion, which was eventually exposed upon the invention of the nautical sextant. Using sextants and plane trigonometry, by measuring the Sun’s angle at two points on Earth simultaneously and factoring their distance from each other, the Pythagorean theorum reveals both the height and dimensions of the Sun. Using this method, the Sun and Moon have repeatedly been calculated to be approximately 32 miles in diameter, 3000 miles from the surface of the Earth. High altitude balloon footage has also filmed lighting hot-spots on clouds proving the Sun to be local and acting as a spotlight, and not a burning ball of gas millions of miles away as supposed by heliocentrists. After Eratosthenes, the globe-Earth theory completely disappeared from philosophical thought and recorded history for almost two millennia. Geocentric flat-Earth cosmologies continued to reign supreme, with even Eratosthenes himself, touted as the “Father of Geography,” depicting the Earth as flat in his famous 194 B.C. map of the world. https://ericdubay.wordpress.com/2018/07/10/the-history-of-flat-earth/

I've been asked the question: why are high tides different across the earth? example 10 meter tide in one countries shore and 4 meters tide rise in another during the same time frame.

NoSpin100 wrote:I've been asked the question: why are high tides different across the earth?  example 10 meter tide in one countries shore and 4 meters tide rise in another during the same time frame.

How do tides work on a globe model ? How does water stop from falling off a ball?
I dont know how tides work differently, i can presume it is due to relative electromagnetism. Certainly not the moons gravity.
Peace

Cause of the Tides? https://ifers.123.st/t133-what-causes-the-ocean-s-tides

Thank you, i guessed electromagnetism (couldn't articulate what my mind was posing) i definitely needed more guidance in the wording and a more detailed explanation, much appreciated.

Admin wrote:Cause of the Tides?  https://ifers.123.st/t133-what-causes-the-ocean-s-tides

Thank you.

NoSpin100 wrote:Thank you, i guessed electromagnetism (couldn't articulate what my mind was posing) i definitely needed more guidance in the wording and a more detailed explanation, much appreciated.

Read Erics books

This also

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLolvRcPoDA

So I just got back from a conversation with another truther on Instagram and there are a group of folks trying to slander Eric, claiming he's a transgender. Using his old clips/stills as a way of shaming him visually.. I've expalined the situation as rationally as possible as I know the world will want to make a "Hitler" out of Eric. Anyway https://www.instagram.com/p/COAUFXfnphm/?igshid=dhkynhreciv2 here's a link of the post people are now trying to circulate on social media.

I hope this helps and hopefully you can shed light to those being mislead. Much appreciated brother

Moonhowling wrote:So I just got back from a conversation with another truther on Instagram and there are a group of folks trying to slander Eric, claiming he's a transgender. Using his old clips/stills as a way of shaming him visually.. I've expalined the situation as rationally as possible as I know the world will want to make a "Hitler" out of Eric. Anyway https://www.instagram.com/p/COAUFXfnphm/?igshid=dhkynhreciv2 here's a link of the post people are now trying to circulate on social media.

I hope this helps and hopefully you can shed light to those being mislead. Much appreciated brother

Top video when u search him on jootube is Yoga Posing New Age Actor if u scroll thru ifers controlled opposition he speaks about it

FiachraW wrote:

Moonhowling wrote:So I just got back from a conversation with another truther on Instagram and there are a group of folks trying to slander Eric, claiming he's a transgender. Using his old clips/stills as a way of shaming him visually.. I've expalined the situation as rationally as possible as I know the world will want to make a "Hitler" out of Eric. Anyway https://www.instagram.com/p/COAUFXfnphm/?igshid=dhkynhreciv2 here's a link of the post people are now trying to circulate on social media.

I hope this helps and hopefully you can shed light to those being mislead. Much appreciated brother

Top video when u search him on jootube is Yoga Posing New Age Actor if u scroll thru ifers controlled opposition he speaks about it

Here's one guy claiming he's a shill.. Good lord people are getting dumber..

Yeah I've been aware of this controlled opposition stuff for a while now. Its just annoying to see it pickup up traction during a time where we have answers..

I have a great deal of respect for Eric and his work although I deeply disagree with much of the new-agey stuff.

I can't fault the FE content here, or Eric's contribution in keeping the subject fresh and alive.

However.

It is very easily demonstrated that any genuine threat to the Talmudic NWO is dealt with quickly and summarily and mostly with tremendous symbolism:
Lincoln
Kennedy
Lennon
John Smith
John Magufuli
and many others.

With respect to Eric, David Icke, James Corbett, Spiros whatssisname (activist post), renegade tribune, truth stream media, the chemtrails guy and natural news, GAB etc. etc. etc......

Just take what you can use but bear in mind that knowingly or not they are all Judas goats. If they weren't they wouldn't have as much of a voice as they do.

Sorry peeps, but you need to know that we've been identified and when the sh*t starts really hitting the fan we WILL be sought out and rounded up. So be ready to flee or fight, because it IS coming.