ISS Hoax - The International Space Station Does Not Exist!

nowhereelsetogo wrote:OK I think it pays to be open minded. I'm convinced by other simpler things that our world is flat and stationery, space ISS and all of that I have to rely on others.

There's a strong FE thread on David Ickes forums with some very aggressive and relentless opponents.

One of them posted this and I am having difficulty because it looks quite convincing in relation to the time in weightlessness.

Any views please? I had a cursory look for signs of editing but couldn't see anything.



Is it possible that they can recreate the phemomenon just by being at that point (75 - 100km?) where the V2 test and amateur rockets lost all energy suddenly and floated around a bit before falling down again.  

---
Here is a fascinating video -- compare the behavior of Magic Man's black sweater with Astro-not Sunni Williams black sweatshirt.

______

Thanks Oliver, I love it!

I have been awake to the globe lie for some time now thanks to Eric's work. Previous to this, however, I was an advid sky observer. I have tracked the "ISS" using those clever smart phone apps that can tell you exactly when the "ISS" will be above your location.

During my several times observing this (I saw a slow moving bright light through the night sky) I am amazed at the accuracy of the data that some people have regarding this "ISS". We clearly understand its movement through the cosmos.
Doea anyone have any information regarding the history of this "ISS" star that moves through the night sky in a predictable manner?
I dont believe it was man made, so is there any history on the subject of this moving star through the night sky before NASA claimed it as their own?

Zzzap wrote:
I have been awake to the globe lie for some time now thanks to Eric's work. Previous to this, however, I was an advid sky observer. I have tracked the "ISS" using those clever smart phone apps that can tell you exactly when the "ISS" will be above your location.

During my several times observing this (I saw a slow moving bright light through the night sky) I am amazed at the accuracy of the data that some people have regarding this "ISS". We clearly understand its movement through the cosmos.
Doea anyone have any information regarding the history of this "ISS" star that moves through the night sky in a predictable manner?
I dont believe it was man made, so is there any history on the subject of this moving star through the night sky before NASA claimed it as their own?

We’re talking about HABs - High Altititude Balloons. Not much different than your average hot air balloon, but without people. A generic image search for “satellites before takeoff” mostly shows balloons. They generally fly above 50k feet, tho some may fly below 30k feet. Thus avoiding typical jet air travel.... which is 35,000-45,000 feet, usually 41k feet.

So.... they may well actually be man-made. Spy planes and drones fly at 50-80,000 feet. B-52’s at 55,000 feet altitude, etc...

doh! thanks for that answer .
Now that you mentioned HAB- i feel silly i did'nt think about them.
That makes perfect sense, what I noticed most was the intensity of the light compared to the other "twinkles" in the night sky. I immediately thought that this "fast moving star" would have easily been observed by our past civilizations .

Your answer makes complete sense to me.
The light intensity is different because its artifical and has never been in the night sky before it was inflated and sent out.
Any computer program could then be designed to track the HAB.
Thanks for that!

Zzzap wrote:doh! thanks for that answer .
Now that you mentioned HAB- i feel silly i did'nt think about them.
That makes perfect sense, what I noticed most was the intensity of the light compared to the other "twinkles" in the night sky. I immediately thought that this "fast moving star" would have easily been observed by our past civilizations .

Your answer makes complete sense to me.
The light intensity is different because its artifical and has never been in the night sky before it was inflated and sent out.
Any computer program could then be designed to track the HAB.
Thanks for that!

Anytime! Also image searches for “satellites on the ground” almost always show balloons attached.

Furthermore they claim satellites stay in orbit for 20 years or more, powered by solar. However there’s no good method to convert solar to thrust. They’d never be able to maintain an orbit for very long. When you present this fact to globetards they really have no response, as there is none.

In my mind, the satellite hoax is among the easiest to disprove.