NASA Fail Compilation

Fellow Flat Earthers,


PLease pick this video apart from the Nvidia CEO, who tries to answer all the conspiracies behind the moon landings, he conveniently doesnt care to explain the LEM not leaving behind any blast craters, and a bunch of other shit. God I want to slap every one of those idiots in that room clapping for this tard. Damn real life trolls. I apologize in advance if this has already been posted, but I coudlnt resist laughing at this guy and sharing it with the community https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syVP6zDZN7I&feature=emb_rel_end

Hi guys,

Can someone help me understand how they did it? I'm really intrigued because I don't think it was made with cables or the zero-gravity plane.



Pure CGI?

danielmarchiori wrote:Hi guys,

Can someone help me understand how they did it? I'm really intrigued because I don't think it was made with cables or the zero-gravity plane.



Pure CGI?

Daniel,

Obviously, you have taken the correct first step -- you understand that this is not a space station floating above a ball, filled with busy scientists and rocket jockeys.

It is a cylindrical sound stage, and the actress, Sunni Williams is dangling from filaments, appearing to float. Take another look at her black sweatshirt and you will see just random sideways angular pulls of fabric. Notice how her hair is sprayed and styled in a full explosion, sticking straight outwards from her head.

Now, take a look at this video, of this illusionist and observe the same little angular pulls of fabric from the black sweater.

That is how they did it.

Daniel,

Obviously, you have taken the correct first step -- you understand that this is not a space station floating above a ball, filled with busy scientists and rocket jockeys.

It is a cylindrical sound stage, and the actress, Sunni Williams is dangling from filaments, appearing to float.  Take another look at her black sweatshirt and you will see just random sideways angular pulls of fabric.  Notice how her hair is sprayed and styled in a full explosion, sticking straight outwards from her head.

Now, take a look at this video, of this illusionist and observe the same little angular pulls of fabric from the black sweater.

That is how they did it.  

---

Hi Oliver, thanks for the feedback.

I don't believe in nasa, I know we didn't go to the moon and we don't live in a wet spinning ball.

But this video is very disturbing, watch it at https://youtu.be/SGP6Y0Pnhe4?t=99 the girl's necklace behaves in a strange way, and in the next few seconds she gets stuck in 3 holes where it would not be possible to be stuck cables. Is it the anti-gravity plane? But if it is, they keep recording for a long time. This video crap is quite intriguing.

---

danielmarchiori wrote:

Daniel,

Obviously, you have taken the correct first step -- you understand that this is not a space station floating above a ball, filled with busy scientists and rocket jockeys.

It is a cylindrical sound stage, and the actress, Sunni Williams is dangling from filaments, appearing to float.  Take another look at her black sweatshirt and you will see just random sideways angular pulls of fabric.  Notice how her hair is sprayed and styled in a full explosion, sticking straight outwards from her head.

Now, take a look at this video, of this illusionist and observe the same little angular pulls of fabric from the black sweater.

That is how they did it.  

---

Hi Oliver, thanks for the feedback.

I don't believe in nasa, I know we didn't go to the moon and we don't live in a wet spinning ball.

But this video is very disturbing, watch it at https://youtu.be/SGP6Y0Pnhe4?t=99 the girl's necklace behaves in a strange way, and in the next few seconds she gets stuck in 3 holes where it would not be possible to be stuck cables. Is it the anti-gravity plane? But if it is, they keep recording for a long time. This video crap is quite intriguing.

---

Intriguing indeed. I certainly don't have all of the answers, but I can say that the best explanation I can see is that from what I can tell, she is floating down belly-first with the suspension filaments behind her -- and the camera is looking up at her. You can clearly see distinct angled Points of the fabric of her black sweatshirt, supporting her weight and/or steering her movements. And, just like a puppet marionette, the strings can be loosened to allow her to bounce into the holes.

The necklace appears to be a nice touch. Subtle. But if she is dangling belly-first, as I predict, it does explain some of the forward float of the necklace. Again, I don't have all of the answers.

But this video raises more questions for me:

What "Experiments" and scientific-studies are they supposedly accomplishing? We have always been told that they spend their days conducting research in micro-gravity and so on -- but what are their findings after years and years of time and billions and billions of dollars? This space station has been floating around for almost 25 years, so they say -- but has it improved any of our lives?

Sunni Williams, the star actress in this production, she is supposed to be a scientist, astronaut -- a brilliant mind, talented and dedicated to the mission. They have her demonstrating beds, toothpaste, hair grooming and toilets in space. Is there a part 2 where Sunni shows Real work, real science or anything real taking place?

The answers to all of my questions and yours are the same -- this is a fake, studio-quality production showcasing actors dangling on strings. It costs billions and billions of dollars and provides absolutely zero positive net results for the world.

More NASA fakery.  A video of the moon's shadow over the sun at https://sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov/gallery/potw/item/954 .

NASA explanation. "On Mar. 6, 2019, SDO observed a long lunar transit - with a twist. The shadow of the Moon in SDO's images first touched the limb of the Sun at 2200 UTC (5pm EST) on Mar. 6, making its way across and finally left the solar disk at 0209 UTC on Mar. 7 (9:09 pm EST, Mar. 6). The moon's apparent reversal is caused by SDO first overtaking the moon in its orbit, then the moon catching up as SDO swings around Earth's dusk side. During the transit the Sun moves in the frame as the telescopes cool and flex in the lunar shadow.ÊNote that the edge of the Moon is very (fake) sharp because it has no atmosphere. Credit: Solar Dynamics Observatory, NASA. This is the last Picture of the Week produced by Steele Hill. We would like to thank Steele for 9 years of SDO POTWs! He also selects POTWs for SoHO and STEREO. With 23 and 13 years on-orbit, that means Steele has picked over 2000 POTWs! Thanks for looking at all those beautiful images and finding a favorite almost every week!"

Video links:

https://sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov/assets/gallery/movies/Lunar_eclipse171cross_sm.mp4

https://sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov/assets/gallery/movies/Lunar_eclipse171cross_big.mp4

tycho_brahe wrote:More NASA fakery.  A video of the moon's shadow over the sun at https://sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov/gallery/potw/item/954 .

NASA explanation. "On Mar. 6, 2019, SDO observed a long lunar transit - with a twist. The shadow of the Moon in SDO's images first touched the limb of the Sun at 2200 UTC (5pm EST) on Mar. 6, making its way across and finally left the solar disk at 0209 UTC on Mar. 7 (9:09 pm EST, Mar. 6). The moon's apparent reversal is caused by SDO first overtaking the moon in its orbit, then the moon catching up as SDO swings around Earth's dusk side. During the transit the Sun moves in the frame as the telescopes cool and flex in the lunar shadow.ÊNote that the edge of the Moon is very (fake) sharp because it has no atmosphere. Credit: Solar Dynamics Observatory, NASA. This is the last Picture of the Week produced by Steele Hill. We would like to thank Steele for 9 years of SDO POTWs! He also selects POTWs for SoHO and STEREO. With 23 and 13 years on-orbit, that means Steele has picked over 2000 POTWs! Thanks for looking at all those beautiful images and finding a favorite almost every week!"

Video links:

https://sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov/assets/gallery/movies/Lunar_eclipse171cross_sm.mp4

https://sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov/assets/gallery/movies/Lunar_eclipse171cross_big.mp4

I don't understand. How can the moon cast a shadow on the sun?

Is that what they're saying or am I being dim?

Yep! You read it correctly. It makes no sense. NASA knows the masses will believe anything.

Hello Everyone,
I note that there is an online auction of NASA photographs running at the moment and ending on 25th November.
Perhaps it would be interesting for someone here to buy a photograph and then challange the authenticity of the item with some solid arguments?
Here is a link to the catalogue-

https://www.the-saleroom.com/en-gb/auction-catalogues/kanerz-art/catalogue-id-kanerz10071?utm_source=auction-alert&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=auction-alert&utm_content=catlink#lot-1a4f0ce8-1a6e-4de1-adb2-adde01041604

Any thoughts?

Kindest regards
macapaca

macapaca wrote:Hello Everyone,
I note that there is an online auction of NASA photographs running at the moment and ending on 25th November.
Perhaps it would be interesting for someone here to buy a photograph and then challange the authenticity of the item with some solid arguments?
Here is a link to the catalogue-

https://www.the-saleroom.com/en-gb/auction-catalogues/kanerz-art/catalogue-id-kanerz10071?utm_source=auction-alert&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=auction-alert&utm_content=catlink#lot-1a4f0ce8-1a6e-4de1-adb2-adde01041604

Any thoughts?

Kindest regards
macapaca

Thank you macapaca for your post!

I was going through NASA’s 'photos' recently because especially their old ones (from the 60s) really reveal their process of deceiving everyone with their fake shots from 'space'. I'll probably make a separate post about those photos, but I would recommend to take a look for yourself on this site:
https://tothemoon.ser.asu.edu/search?class=nav-light&page=1

Anyway, on the site of the online auction are some remarkable finds as well! Take a good look at LOT 20, 27 and 28! As if the flat earth here wasn’t obvious enough, read the description of LOT 20: "Watching a full moon looming above the Earth’s horizon seen from space."

Besides, LOT 125, 126, 128 and 130 are clearly cartoons. I mean, come on.. they don’t even try to hide it!

Would also love to know if someone actually could challenge the authenticity!

I was looking through the NASA website amusing myself with all the fakery and came across this gem. I don't know if it has been shown here yet but I'll put it up
https://eoimages.gsfc.nasa.gov/images/imagerecords/79000/79765/dnb_land_ocean_ice.2012.3600x1800.jpg
Hint: look at Australia, and if you know anything about where there are major populations and just desert you will piss yourself,

And then I found the poor attempt at the cover up, someone in the artistic licence department must of got a arse kicking for this!
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/80030/city-lights-of-australia-or-not

Shmack_1 wrote:And then I found the poor attempt at the cover up, someone in the artistic licence department must of got a arse kicking for this!
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/80030/city-lights-of-australia-or-not

The very last paragraph:

“And ultimately, the new images of Earth at night are ripe for new discoveries. It’s easy to say that lands are uninhabited or barren—that there’s nothing out there to make light. But the satellite says there is light, so we should probably go take a look at what we have been overlooking or simply could not see before.”

Literally saying stop noticing things and just listen to the experts lol.