The Sun, Moon, and Stars Prove the Flat Earth

linguo wrote:
How Earth protected from the gamma rays generated by Sun?
Watch these people try to answer a seriously important question while not one of them can agree with each other
http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/142005/how-earth-protected-from-the-gamma-rays-generated-by-sun

Science Fiction Facts:
The Sun is not producing "nuclear fusion"
No Nukes
No Neutrinos
No Photons
No Solar gamma rays
No Solar flares
No Atmosphere
No Ozone Layer
No hole in the ozone-layer above Antarctica

I didn't think atomic theory depended on heliocentricism. It's ruled by electromagnetism. Am I incorrect?

linguo wrote:
I didn't think atomic theory depended on heliocentricism.
It's ruled by electromagnetism. Am I incorrect?

Science Fiction Facts:

• Big Bang Theory
  
• Heliocentric Theory
  
• Atomic Theory
  

All one and the same visually.

São Paulo, Brazil. Dec 21/2016 at 5:30am (Nikon P900) facing Northwest direction.

Saw a star appear like a normal one in the night sky, flashed VERY bright, like the sun for a second, and disappeared completely?

not sure where else to post and I got in trouble for making a topic with such short manifesto so posting here

Illuminati? You mean jews wrote:Saw a star appear like a normal one in the night sky, flashed VERY bright, like the sun for a second, and disappeared completely?

not sure where else to post and I got in trouble for making a topic with such short manifesto so posting here

What date and time did you observe this?
What was your location?
Was there anyone with you that saw this star?
What part of the sky?
Was it moving?
Best regards

Beashambassador wrote:

Illuminati? You mean jews wrote:Saw a star appear like a normal one in the night sky, flashed VERY bright, like the sun for a second, and disappeared completely?

not sure where else to post and I got in trouble for making a topic with such short manifesto so posting here

What date and time did you observe this?
What was your location?
Was there anyone with you that saw this star?
What part of the sky?
Was it moving?
Best regards

2 January 2017, 8:30 is my prediction
North west nsw
No one was with me
well that's hard to describe.. i live in a two story house so standing on a one story house and lifting my head about 5cm, it was in the lower star region
it was not moving at all

It was extremely bizarre, and for some reason I knew something was going to happen when I saw the star appear.

This is me by the way, i've been banned for no reason. AGAIN. I want answer as to why so I know it's not fucking internet filtration because this is the best place to post this kind of things

First time posting on here guys, i went out for a cig a moment ago and there was this ring around the moon can anyone explain??

was taken on my phone also have a video too was really weird surely this shows how close the moon is in order to have the light disperse so outwards like that ??

o0LJ0o wrote:was taken on my phone also have a video too was really weird surely this shows how close the moon is in order to have the light disperse so outwards like that ??

https://youtu.be/XuIyrpFN7YQ

reminded me of this video.

In my opinion it is a visual effect coused by reflection of medium / dome above us.
Some sort of mirroring effect, similar as it can been observed with rainbows.

Real World wrote:In my opinion it is a visual effect coused by reflection of medium / dome above us.
Some sort of mirroring effect, similar as it can been observed with rainbows.

Care to back up that opinion with anything or are you here to waste time with silly ideas that are clearly not believed by most in this crowd? There are plenty of pages with details on the subject that so far lead to silly town you can read if you want.

thugnastylol - if you are that knowledgable bring it on and shine on everyone your knowledge, what is cousing that effect? Have you been there to know it or this forum is also to look for answear from multiple opinions?

Please do not misinterpret me, i dont believe in religious versios of dome, i meant that i have reason to think there is different medium above us. Like atmosphere is a medium, water is other medium, and some sort of gas is another medium. I dont know what it is, but i assume it has other properties then our Atmospheric medium so it can work with light very specyficly on some occasions cousing those visual effects.

Real World wrote:Please do not misinterpret me, i dont believe in religious versios of dome, i meant that i have reason to think there is different medium above us. Like atmosphere is a medium, water is other medium, and some sort of gas is another medium. I dont know what it is, but i assume it has other properties then our Atmospheric medium so it can work with light very specyficly on some occasions cousing those visual effects.

First you ask me not to misunderstand you, but you contradict yourself immediately after. You say that you "have reason to think there is different medium above us", with no evidence as shown in the start of the next sentence, "I dont know what it is, but i assume". My purpose here is not to point out flaws, it is simply to keep the ideas focused on topics based on evidence.

We can sit here and name chemicals and metals known to be put in the air or show diagrams of how atmosphere becomes less dense as we get further from sea level to speculate on where light will react most probably. To me this is not very important. It is easy to be seduced to want to know why about things (especially to things that we only have a tiny exciting glimmer of info into), however sharing what we do know for sure about the liars involved and the pitfalls and traps laid out in the system to those around us is a much better use of effort for the cause.

thugnastylol - in first message you wrotte "There are plenty of pages with details on the subject that so far lead to silly town". In the second message you have not even mentioned any town.
Yes, i do have a reason to think like i wrotte, and i pointed why.
Yes i dont know for sure how it works - this is my opinion, as i'm still trying to find many answers.
Where are your evidences? Can you name precisly chemicals which are higher then 10, 50 or 100 km above earth, to make judgment how it effets on vision?
Next you wrotte "density is not that important to you" - Very selective and individual you are in your reserches. I dont mind someone else opinion, as i take yours, but so far from very begining your rude attitude i showing more of your ego insted of any evidences.

I disagree with you about lack of importance of density. Why?
What we see is result of air density and different pressures related to that, plus on top goes perspective with our globular eyes construction and light as information, all of that together giving various results to confuse many people in reserches.

If you plan to continue this way of comunication please use Private Message, so we can exange our opinions or 'evidences'.

I find density to be important, the part I don't find as important is what is actually in the atmosphere that may make light reflect in a ring shape like the image above. I have no ways of sampling air at many heights, so I have to read studies that NASA and agricultural groups put out when they do atmospheric testing, which is not very helpful. This topic on atmospheric change does impact people and all life, so I think understanding why these companies are impacting our atmosphere is important. However I don't believe we will figure anything tangible out with opinions based on no evidence.

Your original post "In my opinion it is a visual effect coused by reflection of medium / dome above us. Some sort of mirroring effect, similar as it can been observed with rainbows." gives us nothing but your speculation. Please fully explain your opinion (links if possible) and I will gladly provide my opinion and possibly some links to check out.

Flat Earth Luminology (Flat Earth Astrology)  

Earth is stationary. It is not spinning or orbiting the sun.
Walk around a person with a full cup of hot coffee filled to the brim. Be careful not to get burned as you orbit that person. Now have that person you are circumnavigating walk forward at a constant speed and continue orbiting without spilling the coffee. To get around him you have to accelerate to get on his other side, then decelerate or you will be left behind as he continues on his way.  If your body continues to orbit that moving person at a constant velocity, the length of steps your feet take must vary. In other words, the forces on that cup of coffee are constantly varying and you will get burned.

If the sun is moving in a curved path around the Milky Way at ~450,000 mph, Earth must be traveling at that speed plus 67,000 mph. If Earth is orbiting at a constant velocity, then the forces causing the circumnavigation must vary. Either way, our bodies would sense changes in velocity or the forces required to maintain an orbit.

Destany Mall in Syracuse, NY has a large Carousel. Your body feels any changes in velocity, and, as you move further from the center, the centripetal force gets stronger ejecting you off the platform if you don’t hold onto something.

If Earth is moving in a curved path within the Milky Way at ~527,000 mph, which law of physics exempts a sleeping chicken balanced on one foot from falling over?

The invisible things of this world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made.

Sweden 2017-02-28  17:42
Very rare to see the moon during daylight in sweden.
Did not have my tripod with me so the picture is taken with a handheld P900.

Sun, Moon, and Stars Prove the Flat Earth



Sad to see Rory Cooper's channel missing from you tube. He is one of the best at explaining things. Hopefully he will be back.

So the Sun & Moon are going around us counter clockwise so this means that not everyone would have sun and moon rises in the east? Some would see the sun and moon rise from the west? Wouldn't this be impossible on a globe?

Danno25 wrote:
Sun & Moon are going around us counter clockwise

The Sun and Moon orbit clockwise above the flat Earth.

Sun Timelaps from Finland facing North

Thinkforyourself wrote:Posted by Admin on 05/18/2015

Hey BrandonD, read again, this is not "very technical and complicated," when light of any kind shines through a dense medium it appears larger, or rather gives a greater glare, at a given distance than when it is seen through a lighter medium. This is more remarkable when the medium holds aqueous particles or vapor in solution, as in a damp or foggy atmosphere. You can see this by standing within a few yards of a street lamp, and noticing the size of the light; on going away to many times the distance, the light upon the atmosphere will appear considerably larger. This phenomenon may be noticed, to a greater or less degree, at all times; but when the air is moist and vapory it is more intense. It is evident that at sunrise, and at sunset, the sun's light must shine through a greater length of atmospheric air than at mid-day; besides which, the air near the earth is both more dense, and holds more watery particles in solution, than the higher strata through which the sun shines at noonday; and hence the light must be dilated or magnified, as well as modified in color. So the Sun as it sets towards the horizon, from a viewer's perspective on Earth, simultaneously gets bigger due to the reason given above, AND smaller due to the law of perspective. The net result is what you see.

Thanks for this explanation. It's indeed not very technical and complicated, but still very, very interesting.

https://www.rt.com/viral/387050-meteorite-auction-lunar-martian/

Hi, i got problem with the new moon phase. Wikipedia says:
[i]In astronomy, new moon is the first phase of the Moon, when it orbits not seen from the Earth, the moment when the Moon and the Sun have the same ecliptical longitude.[1] The Moon is not visible[note 1] at this time except when it is seen in silhouette during a solar eclipse when it is illuminated by earthshine. See the article on phases of the Moon for further details.[i] So far, so good. That means, when i understand that correctly, i stand on earth, look to the sky at the moon, but i cannot see them, because the sun is in one line behind the moon. In nighttime? That means to me, i could only see a new moon on daytime... If i´m wrong, show me the mistake in my explanation... That´s pretty important for me to know that. I have already a lot of discussions where i life. This would be for me a further indication the prove the earth is not a spinning ball... Best regards from Germany