Cell Tower Microwave Radiation

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Cell Tower Microwave Radiation

Post by Thinkforyourself on Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:49 pm

Posted by marleyites on 09/12/2015

Here's a video and information regarding this phenomenon of electromagnetic radiation.

I just visited an under-construction, brand new senior citizens center, where the elders of the community will meet and eat.

The center is within 100 ft. of the base of the cell tower. Since I just found this video, I'll have to do some more research and post more. This is to get started...





Published on Mar 15, 2012

In March 2012, Professor Magda Havas of Trent University gave a one hour presentation to the citizens of Oakville Ontario Canada that demonstrated the amount of microwave emissions that are emitted by cell phone antenna. The audience in attendance were mostly members of the local community of Bronte that were concerned about 6 additional cell phone antenna that were placed on a tower beside their local fire station.

In this video you will be introduced to several cell antenna studies that show the microwave radiation that is emitted by these towers are harmful to human health. You will hear testimony of one person that lived right below a cluster of cell antenna that had been placed on her roof. Using radio frequency meters, Dr. Havas also demonstrated how wireless household appliances such as portable phones, WiFi base stations and DECT baby monitors broadcast constant microwave radiation that are similar in intensity a few hundred meters away from a large cell phone tower.

For links to read about the studies that were mentioned visit www.celltowerstudy.com

For information about the Bronte Fire Station protest visit www.mybronte.ca

For information about Dr. Magda Havas visit www.magdahavas.com

The program was produced by James Spalding for Burlington/Oakville TVCogeco and this segment is an excerpt from the original 2 hour program.

_________________
All about Shillaphobia

Shun the non-believers!

'Flat Earth Diva'

Supposed 'temper temper beanpole', 'snidy weasel' and 'clueless, cloying, sychophant.'

Apparently 'dangerous person'
avatar
Thinkforyourself
Admin

Posts : 2080
Points : 5641
Reputation : 2799
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 26
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Cell Tower Microwave Radiation

Post by George Tirebiter on Thu Feb 25, 2016 6:34 pm

Here's a video interview of Barrie Trower on the dangers of microwave radiation:

avatar
George Tirebiter

Posts : 55
Points : 731
Reputation : 132
Join date : 2016-02-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

The Cooking of Humanity

Post by George Tirebiter on Fri Mar 11, 2016 6:25 pm

An excellent interview by Deborah Tevares with Barrie Trower:

avatar
George Tirebiter

Posts : 55
Points : 731
Reputation : 132
Join date : 2016-02-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

The Microwave Control Grid

Post by George Tirebiter on Sun Mar 13, 2016 5:19 pm

More info from Deborah Taveres on the microwave control grid:

avatar
George Tirebiter

Posts : 55
Points : 731
Reputation : 132
Join date : 2016-02-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Cell Tower Microwave Radiation

Post by Thinkforyourself on Sun Mar 13, 2016 5:22 pm

George Tirebiter wrote:More info from Deborah Taveres on the microwave control grid:


Thanks for posting. One thing that I needed to point out is that the woman in the video refers to 'satellites', which of course don't exist, but she is right to warn of the dangers of microwave cell phone towers.

_________________
All about Shillaphobia

Shun the non-believers!

'Flat Earth Diva'

Supposed 'temper temper beanpole', 'snidy weasel' and 'clueless, cloying, sychophant.'

Apparently 'dangerous person'
avatar
Thinkforyourself
Admin

Posts : 2080
Points : 5641
Reputation : 2799
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 26
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars

Post by George Tirebiter on Sun Mar 13, 2016 5:49 pm

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, An Introduction Programming Manual was uncovered quite by accident on July 7, 1986 when an employee of Boeing Aircraft Co. purchased a surplus IBM copier for scrap parts at a sale, and discovered inside details of a plan, hatched in the embryonic days of the "Cold War" which called for control of the masses through manipulation of industry, peoples' pastimes, education and political leanings. It called for a quiet revolution, putting brother against brother,
and diverting the public's attention from what is really going on.

Some quotes from the text:

"It is patently impossible to discuss social engineering or the automation of a society, i.e., the engineering of social automation systems (silent weapons) on a national or worldwide scale without implying extensive objectives of social control and destruction of human life, i.e., slavery and genocide. This manual is in itself an analog declaration of intent. Such a writing must be secured from public scrutiny. Otherwise, it might be recognized as a technically formal declaration of domestic war. Furthermore, whenever any person or group of persons in a position of great power and without full knowledge and consent of the public, uses such knowledge and methodologies for economic conquest - it must be understood that a state of domestic warfare exists between said person or group of persons and the public.

"You have qualified for this project because of your ability to look at human society with cold objectivity, and yet analyze and discuss your observations and conclusions with others of similar intellectual capacity without the loss of discretion or humility. Such virtues are exercised in your own best interest. Do not deviate from them.

"In 1954 it was well recognized by those in positions of authority that it was only a matter of time, only a few decades, before the general public would be able to grasp and upset the cradle of power, for the very elements of the new silent weapon technology were as accessible for a public utopia as they were for providing a private utopia.

"All science is merely a means to an end. The means is knowledge. The end is control. Beyond this remains only one issue: Who will be the beneficiary?

"Consequently, in the interest of future world order, peace, and tranquility, it was decided to privately wage a quiet war
against the American public with an ultimate objective of permanently shifting the natural and social energy (wealth) of the undisciplined and irresponsible many into the hands of the self-disciplined, responsible, and worthy few. In order to implement this objective, it was necessary to create, secure, and apply new weapons which, as it turned out, were a class
of weapons so subtle and sophisticated in their principle of operation and public appearance as to earn for themselves the name "silent weapons"."(1)    

Short video by Deborah Taveres on the Silent Weapons System:



A reading of the document Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars:



Cite-(Read More)

(1)A link to the document Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars:

http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/SILENT%20WEAPONS%20for%20QUIET%20WARS.pdf
avatar
George Tirebiter

Posts : 55
Points : 731
Reputation : 132
Join date : 2016-02-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Low Intensity Radiofrequency Radiation: A New Oxidant For Living Cells

Post by George Tirebiter on Mon Mar 21, 2016 1:39 am

There exist a great number of studies showing the negative effects of non-native EMF. As usual, the cell phone industry has led the way in burying this evidence under fallacious claims of safety and labeling whistle-blowers and truth-tellers as wackos.

Just standard operating procedure to keep the cash flow uninterrupted.

Where have we seen this before?

"Radiofrequency radiation (RFR), e.g. electromagnetic waves emitted by our cell phones and Wi-Fi, are referred to as non-ionizing. This means that in contrast to the ionizing radiation, which does induce  ionization of water and biologically  important macromolecules, RFR does not have a capacity for such effects. Unlike, for example X-rays, the energy of RFR is not enough to break electrons off the molecules. However, is RFR completely safe for public health? Traditionally, the industry and the public bodies said yes. Nevertheless, new research data change this perception.

"Oxidative stress is an induced imbalance between pro-oxidant and antioxidant systems resulting in oxidative damage  to  proteins, lipids and DNA; and is closely connected to overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in living cells. The  notion that the low intensity RFR can bring about significant oxidative stress in living cells has been doubted for years. The logic is simple: as low intensity radiofrequency electromagnetic waves are not able to ionize molecules, they can do nothing   wrong for the living tissues. However, during the last decades a worldwide increase in penetration of wireless communication systems, including cellular telephony and Wi-Fi, attracted massive attention to possible biological effects of low intensity RFR. Consequently, the recent epidemiological studies unexpectedly indicated a significant increase in the occurrence of various  tumors among longterm and “heavy” users of cellular phones. These include brain tumors, acoustic neuromas, tumors of parotid  glands, seminomas, melanomas and lymphomas. Similarly, an increase in tumor incidence  among  people  living nearby cellular base transmitting stations was also reported. As a result, in 2011 the World Health Organization/International Agency for Research on Cancer classified radiofrequency radiation as a possible carcinogen to humans.

"To that, a new medical condition, so-called electro-hypersensitivity, in which subjects suffer due to RFR exposure has been described. Typically these people suffer from skin and mucosa related symptoms (itching, smarting, pain, heat sensation), or heart and nervous system disorders after exposure to computer monitors, cell phones and other electromagnetic devices. This malady is growing continuously: starting from 0.06% of the total population in 1985 this category now includes as much as 9-11% of the European population.

"A number of experimental studies demonstrate metabolic effects induced by low intensity RFR. Notwithstanding the non-ionizing nature of RFR, profound mutagenic effects and features of significant oxidative stress in living cells under low
intensity RFR exposure were detected using various biological models. Some of the papers however still show an absence of  biological effects. To clarify the picture, we analyzed peer-reviewed publications on oxidative effects of RFR and found
altogether 80 currently available papers, of which a remarkable part, 76 papers (92.5%), reported the detection of significant oxidative stress. These effects most often included overproduction of ROS, lipid peroxidation/increased concentrations of malondialde-hyde, protein peroxidation, increased concentrations of nitric oxide (NO) and changes in the   activity of antioxidant enzymes. Some papers point to the role of particular ROS and the ROS related pathways.


"Whatever the particular first-step molecular mechanisms, it is clear that the substantial overproduction of ROS in living cells under low intensity RFR exposure could cause a broad spectrum of health disorders and diseases, including cancer in humans. Undoubtedly, this calls for the further intensive research in the area, as well as to a precautionary approach in routine usage of wireless devices."(1)

Cite:
(1) http://www.scopemed.org/fulltextpdf.php?mno=154583


Last edited by George Tirebiter on Mon Mar 21, 2016 7:19 pm; edited 1 time in total
avatar
George Tirebiter

Posts : 55
Points : 731
Reputation : 132
Join date : 2016-02-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Electromagnetic Field Interactions With Biological Systems

Post by George Tirebiter on Mon Mar 21, 2016 7:18 pm

The following information was shared at a symposia of the International Society for Bioelectricity and was presented 24 years ago in 1992. The theme topics for the Symposia were cancer, neural function, cell signaling, pineal gland function, and immune system interactions.

"If one used electromagnetic energy sensors to view the world.....100 years ago, the world would have looked quite dim. Now the world glows with electromagnetic (em) energy emissions at most frequencies of the non-ionizing portion of the spectrum, such as power line fields, radio waves, microwaves, etc.

Living organisms are complex electrochemical systems that up until very recently have interacted with a relatively simple and weak magnetic field and few EMF energy emitters.

"A wide range of living organisms, including humans, [utilize EMF] energy to regulate various critical cellular systems; we see this in the complex of circadian rhythms.

"Thus, it is not surprising that the massive introduction of electromagnetic fields in an enormous range of new frequencies, modulations, and intensities in recent years has affected living organisms. In fact, it would be incredible and beyond belief if these electromagnetic fields did not affect the electrochemical systems we call living organisms.

"Much of the literature on electromagnetic field interactions published before the middle 1980s is irrelevant to biologists. Most of it was generated by the engineering community’s attempt to find out if their high-power equipment creates a hazard. Thus, little attention was paid to the variables that are important in biology. Instead, efforts were wasted in fruitless controversies such as whether the effects seen were thermal or non-thermal.

"In recent years, though, the convergence of a number of lines of research has led a diversity of biologists to carry out experiments using low-intensity electromagnetic fields to study the function of living cells and systems.

"The toxicology model used by investigators in earlier years was not the appropriate model on which to design experiments. It was assumed that electromagnetic fields are a foreign substance to living organisms, like lead or cyanide. With foreign substances in a toxicology model, the greater the dose, the greater the effect-a dose-response relationship. Thus, experiments tended to be designed with high doses and with little regard for other parameters such as modulation and frequency. This is one reason why those earlier studies yielded so little useful information.

"As noted [above], electromagnetic fields are not a foreign substance. Living organisms are electrochemical systems that use emfs in everything from protein folding through cellular communication to nervous system function. A more appropriate model of how living organisms can be expected to respond to em fields would be to compare them to a radio receiver.

"An electromagnetic signal a radio detects (let us call it signal x) and transduces into the sound of music is almost un-measurably weak. Yet the radio is immersed in a sea of em signals from power lines, radio stations, TV stations, radars, etc. The radio doesn’t notice the sea of signals because they are not the appropriate frequency or modulation. Thus, they don’t disturb the music we hear. If we expose the radio to an appropriately tuned em signal or harmonic, however, even if it is very weak compared to signal x, it will interfere with the music. Similarly, if we expose a living system to a very weak em signal, if the signal is appropriately “tuned,” it could facilitate or interfere with normal function. This is the model that much biological data and theory tell us to use, not a toxicology model. And this is the model that is now starting to be used so fruitfully."(1)

And yes, more researchers understand this and realize the need to use this approach in their experiments, but funding for research has been and is currently limited, as is any motivation by the controlled media to expose the results of those studies that have been done.

And currently there are nearly as many cell phones as there are people.

That's a lot of lab rats.......



Cite (Read More):
(1) http://www.fasebj.org/content/7/2/272.full.pdf
avatar
George Tirebiter

Posts : 55
Points : 731
Reputation : 132
Join date : 2016-02-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Antenna Search

Post by George Tirebiter on Mon Mar 21, 2016 8:18 pm



http://www.antennasearch.com/

The link above is to the Antenna Search site, which can be used determine the locations of cell towers and antennas that are operating around a specific location.

Get detailed information on more than 1.9 million towers and antennas in the U.S.

Includes Google maps, ownership details and contact information.

Pinpoint existing towers, future towers and even small hidden antennas.

Get detailed information on:

Existing Towers: Registered and Non-Registered structures where antennas are placed. Towers may be used for various services including Cellular, Paging, Microwave and others.

Future Towers: Newly filed (or pending) applications to construct new towers. Application info includes location coordinates and detailed ownership data.

Antennas: The actual emitters of radio signals. Antennas can be placed on towers (multiple) or can be installed stand alone on top of existing buildings. Stand alone antennas are small (well below 200 ft). You may also check multiple antennas to determine which cell phone carriers are located on a particular tower.

- Quick Statistics (as of Sunday 3/13/2016 Weekly Update) -

Total(US)                     Top State

Towers 599,462             Texas (58,648)
Antennas 1,818,436           California (134,144)
avatar
George Tirebiter

Posts : 55
Points : 731
Reputation : 132
Join date : 2016-02-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Dirty Electricity' and the Diseases of Civilization

Post by George Tirebiter on Mon Mar 21, 2016 9:56 pm

Another deliberately hidden critical facet of the damage inflicted by non-native electromagnetic energy on the human body is the effect of Dirty Electricity.

"Electric and magnetic fields, or EMF, are emitted from electrical devices or anything that uses electricity. Earth currents are low electrical currents found in soil. Natural activity deep within the earth causes some of these currents along with above ground electrical energy to produce low magnitude electrical currents. Transients and high frequency noise or signals come from the wiring of buildings, and from the use of common electrical devices found in homes and offices. The noise is created when electrical current is transmitted and interrupted.

"In these characterizations of electrical pollution, high frequency signals pollute regular electrical currents traveling in wires and currents through the earth. To better understand the background for the causes of electrical pollution, it is helpful to learn the basics of how the electrical current works.

"Regular “clean” power enters homes, buildings, and offices at 60 Hz. The increased use of electrical power overloads electrical grid base, which distributes the power. Power is “dirty” or polluted when it contains the high frequency signals flowing through overloaded wires, and not just clean 60 Hz power.

"The pollution of electricity is often compared to how water is polluted. At the source, water is clean. It is what comes with the water and pollutants along its path to the recipient that makes the water harmful to humans. However, like water pollution in many ways, electrical pollution is complex and often difficult to understand for the common consumer. The causes are varied and sometimes cannot be identified with certainty. However, the bulk of overloaded electricity bases can be attributed to the reliance on electrical appliances in today’s environment.

"In the 1950’s, the National Electrical Safety Code required a neutral wire to return wire to utilities. In this code it was forbidden to use the earth as a neutral return. This was a worsening problem in rural, farm areas where the currents were being returned to the soil affecting the feeding of animals. Later, the Public Service Commission allowed utilities to use grounding rods to serve as neutral wires for return. This was done instead of increasing the size of the neutral rods. Installing ground rods is a less costly solution than making the neutral rods larger in size. The grounding rods serve as an alternate and additional pathway for the energy to return to the substation instead of to the earth.

"Those concerned about electrical pollution say the size of neutral wires to make sure energy is returned to its source needs to be much larger. The current regulated size of the neutrals is not large enough to handle the load due to the greater use of electricity. The currents that are not properly directed are emitted into the environment or into homes or offices where electrical devices are widely relied upon by consumers. Neutral wires are not often sized for the modern electrical load. Power that is misdirected into the earth or home environments contains a much higher frequency that the 60 Hz classification making it “dirty” or unclean.

"Dr. Robert O. Becker, author of Cross Currents and the Body Electric stated that "I have no doubt in my mind that at the present time that the greatest polluting element in the earth's environment is the proliferation of electromagnetic fields. I consider that to be far greater on a global scale that warming".

"The high frequency currents most commonly created by computers and other electronic devices are circulated by various wires and systems, emitting the high frequency currents into home or office environments. Many cases have been documented where decreasing the amount of "dirty" electricity has lessened the effects of health problems and complications. Some of those health problems being attributed to electrical pollution include fibromyalgia, attention deficit disorder, asthma, chronic fatigue syndrome, diabetes, and asthma. There are also cases that detail that electrical pollution aggravates other preexisting conditions like multiple sclerosis and migraine headaches.(2)

"The diseases of civilization or lifestyle diseases include cardiovascular disease, cancer and diabetes and are thought to be caused by changes in diet, exercise habits, and lifestyle which occur as countries industrialize. I think that the critical variable which causes the radical changes in mortality accompanying industrialization is electrification. Beginning in 1979, with the work of Wertheimer and Leeper, there has been increasing evidence that some facet of electromagnetic field exposure is associated epidemiologically with an increased incidence of leukemia, certain other cancers and non-cancers like Alzheimer’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and suicide. With the exception of a small part of the electromagnetic spectrum from infra red through visible light, ultraviolet light and cosmic rays, the rest of the spectrum is man-made and foreign to human evolutionary experience. I suggest that from the time that Thomas Edison started his direct current electrical distribution system in the 1880s in New York City until now, when most of the world is electrified, the electricity carried high frequency voltage transients which caused and continue to cause what are considered to be the normal diseases of civilization. Even today, many of these diseases are absent or have very low incidence in places without electricity.

"When Edison and Tesla opened the Pandora’s box of electrification in the 1880s, the US vital registration system was primitive at best, and infectious disease death rates were falling rapidly. City residents had higher mortality rates and shorter life expectancy than rural residents. Rural white males in 1900 had an expectation of life at birth of over 10 years longer than urban residents.

"Although the authors of the 1930 US vital statistics report noted a 58.2% cancer mortality excess in urban areas, it raised no red flags. The census bureau residential electrification data was obviously not linked to the mortality data. Epidemiologists in that era were still concerned with the communicable diseases. Court Brown and Doll reported the appearance of the child- hood leukemia age peak in 1961, forty years after the US vital statistics mortality data on which it was based was available. I reported a cluster of childhood leukemia a decade after it occurred, only because I looked for it. Real time or periodic analysis of national or regional vital statistics data is still only rarely done in the US.

"The real surprise in this data set is that cardiovascular disease, diabetes and suicide, as well as cancer seem to be strongly related to level of residential electrification. A community-based epidemiologic study of urban rural differences in coronary heart disease and its risk factors was carried out in the mid 1980s in New Delhi, India and in a rural area 50 km away. The prevalence of coronary heart disease was three times higher in the urban residents, despite the fact that the rural residents smoked more and had higher total caloric and saturated fat intakes. Most cardiovascular disease risk factors were two to three times more common in the urban residents. Rural electrification projects are still being carried out in parts of the rural area which was studied.

"It seems unbelievable that mortality differences of this magnitude could go unexplained for over 70 years after they were first reported and 40 years after they were noticed. I think that in the early part of the 20th century nobody was looking for answers. By the time EMF epidemiology got started in 1979 the entire population was exposed to EMFs. Cohort studies were therefore using EMF-exposed population statistics to compute expected values, and case-control studies were comparing more exposed cases to less exposed controls. The mortality from lung cancer in two pack a day smokers is over 20 times that of non-smokers but only three times that of one pack a day smokers. After 1956, the EMF equivalent of a non-smoker ceased to exist in the US. An exception to this is the Amish who live without electricity. Like rural US residents in the 1940s, Amish males in the 1970s had very low cancer and cardiovascular disease mortality rates.

"If this hypothesis and findings outlined here are even partially true, the explosive recent increase in radiofrequency radiation, and high frequency voltage transients sources, especially in urban areas from cell phones and towers, terrestrial antennas, wi-fi and wi-max systems, broadband internet over power lines, and personal electronic equipment, suggests that like the 20th century EMF epidemic, we may already have a 21st century epidemic of morbidity and mortality underway caused by electromagnetic fields. The good news is that many of these diseases may be preventable by environmental manipulation, if society chooses to.(1)



Cite:
(1) http://www.sammilham.com/historical%20evidence.pdf
(2) http://www.dirtyelectricity.org/health-issues.shtml

Sam Milmam's Dirty Electricity Website:
http://www.sammilham.com/links.shtm
avatar
George Tirebiter

Posts : 55
Points : 731
Reputation : 132
Join date : 2016-02-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

EMF Exposure and Potential Health Effects

Post by George Tirebiter on Thu Mar 24, 2016 1:40 am

"In today’s world, everyone is exposed to two types of EMFs: (1) extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF) from electrical and electronic appliances and power lines and (2) radiofrequency radiation (RF) from wireless devices such as cell phones and cordless phones, cellular antennas and towers, and broadcast transmission towers.  In this report we will use the  term EMFs when referring to all electromagnetic fields in general; and the terms ELF and RF when referring to the specific type of exposure.  They are both types of non-ionizing radiation, which means that they do not have sufficient energy to break off electrons from their orbits around atoms and ionize (charge) the atoms, as do x-rays, CT scans, and other forms of ionizing  radiation.

"Main Reasons for Disagreement among Experts: There may be no lower limit at which exposures do not affect us.  Until we know if there is a lower limit below which bioeffects and adverse health impacts do not occur, it is unwise from a public health perspective to continue “business-as-usual” deploying new technologies that increase ELF and RF exposures, particularly involuntary exposures.

1) Scientists and public health policy experts use very different definitions of the standard of evidence used to judge the science, so they come to different conclusions about what to do.  Scientists do have a role, but it is not exclusive and other opinions matter.
2) We are all talking about essentially the same scientific studies, but use a different way of measuring when “enough is enough” or “proof exists”.
3) Some experts keep saying that all studies have to be consistent (turn out the same way every time) before they are comfortable saying an effect exists.  
4) Some experts think that it is enough to look only at short-term, acute effects.
5) Other experts say that it is imperative we have studies over longer time (showing the effects of chronic exposures) since that is what kind of world we live in.
6) Some experts say that everyone, including the very young, the elderly, pregnant women, and people with illnesses have to be considered –others say only the average person (or in the case of RF, a six-foot tall man) matter.
7) There is no unexposed population, making it harder to see increased risk of diseases.
Cool The lack of consensus about a single biological mechanism of action.
9) The strength of human epidemiological studies reporting risks from ELF and RF exposures, but animal studies don’t show a strong toxic effect.  
10) Vested interests have a substantial influence on the health debate.

"Today’s public exposure limits for telecommunications are based on the presumption that heating of tissue (for RF)  or induced electric currents in the body (for ELF) are the only concerns when living organisms are exposed to RF.

"In the last few decades, it has been established beyond any reasonable doubt that bioeffects and some adverse health effects occur at far lower levels of RF and ELF exposure where no heating (or induced currents) occurs at all; some effects are shown to occur at several hundred thousand times below the existing public safety limits where heating is an impossibility.

"It appears it is the INFORMATION conveyed by electromagnetic radiation (rather than heat) that causes biological changes - some of these biological changes may lead to loss of wellbeing, disease and even death.

"Effects occur at non-thermal or low-intensity exposure levels thousands of times below the levels that federal agencies say should keep the public safe. For many new devices operating with wireless technologies, the devices are exempt from any regulatory standards. The existing standards have been proven to be inadequate to control against harm from low-intensity, chronic exposures, based on any reasonable, independent assessment of the scientific literature. It means that an entirely new basis (a biological basis) for new exposure standards is needed.  New standards need to take into account what we have learned about the effects of ELF and RF (all non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation and to design new limits based on biologically demonstrated effects that are important to proper biological function in living organisms.   It is vital to do so because the explosion of new sources has created unprecedented levels of artificial electromagnetic fields that now cover all but remote areas of the habitable space on earth.  Mid-course corrections are needed in the way we accept, test and deploy  new technologies that expose us to ELF and RF in order to avert public health problems of a global nature.

"There may be no lower limit at which exposures do not affect us.  Until we know if there is a lower limit below which bioeffects and adverse health impacts do not occur, it is unwise from a public health perspective to continue “business-as- usual” deploying new technologies that increase ELF and RF exposures, particularly involuntary exposures.

Childhood Leukemia and Other Childhood Cancers

"The evidence that power lines and other sources of ELF are consistently associated with higher rates of childhood leukemia has resulted in the International Agency for Cancer Research (an arm of the World Health Organization) to classify ELF as a Possible Human Carcinogen (in the Group 2B carcinogen list).  Leukemia is the most common type of cancer in children.

"There is little doubt that exposure to ELF causes childhood leukemia.

"The exposure levels for increased risk are quite low –just above background or ambient levels and much lower than current exposure limits.

"There is some evidence that other childhood cancers may be related to ELF exposure but not enough studies have been done.

Brain Tumors and Acoustic Neuromas

"Radiofrequency radiation from cell phone and cordless phone exposure has been linked in more  than one dozen studies to increased risk for brain tumors and/or acoustic neuromas (a tumor in the brain on a nerve related to our hearing).

"People who have used a cell phonefor ten years or more have higher rates of malignant brain tumor and acoustic neuromas.   It is worse if the cell phone has been used primarily on one side of the head.

"For brain tumors, people who have used a cell phone for 10 years or longer have a 20% increase in risk (when the cell phone is used on both sides of the head).  For people who have used a cell phone for 10 years or longer predominantly on one side of the head, there is a 200% increased risk of a brain tumor.  This information relies on the combined results of many brain tumor/cell phone studies taken together (a meta-analysis of studies).

"People who have used a cordless phone for ten years or more have higher rates of malignant brain tumor and acoustic neuromas. It is worse if the cordless phone has been used primarily on one side of the head.

"The risk of brain tumor (high-grade malignant glioma) from cordless phone use is 220% higher (both sides of the head).  The risk from use of a cordless phone is 470% higher when used mostly on only one side of the head.

"For acoustic neuromas, there is a 30% increased risk with cell phone use at ten years and longer; and a 240% increased risk of acoustic neuroma when the cell phone is used mainly on one side of the head.  These risks are based on the combined results of several studies (a meta-analysis of studies).
 
"For use of cordless phones, the increased risk of acoustic neuroma is three-fold higher (310%) when the phone is mainly used on one side of the head.

"The current standard for exposure to the emissions of cell phones and cordless phones is not safe considering studies reporting long-term brain tumor and acoustic neuroma risks.

Other Adult Cancers

"There are multiple studies that show statistically significant relationships between occupational exposure and leukemia in adults (see Chapter 11), in spite of major limitations in the exposure assessment.

"The evidence for a relationship between exposure and breast cancer is relatively strong in men (Erren, 2001), and some (by no means all) studies show female breast cancer also to be elevated with increased exposure (see Chapter 12).  Brain tumors and acoustic neuromas are more common in exposed persons (see Chapter 10).  There is less published evidence on other cancers, but Charles et al. (2003) report that workers in the highest 10% category for EMF exposure were twice as likely to die of prostate cancer as those exposed at lower levels.

"In total the scientific evidence for adult disease associated with EMF exposure is sufficiently strong for adult cancers that preventive steps are appropriate, even if not all reports have shown exactly the same positive relationship.  This is especially true since many factors reduce our ability to see disease patterns that might be related to EMF exposure: there is no unexposed population for comparison, for example, and other difficulties in exposure assessment, The evidence for a relationship between EMF exposure and adult cancers and neurodegenerative diseases is sufficiently strong at present to merit preventive actions to reduce EMF exposure.

Breast Cancer

"There is rather strong evidence from multiple areas of scientific investigation that ELF is related to breast cancer.  Over the last two decades there have been numerous epidemiological studies (studies of human illness) on breast cancer in both men and women, although this relationship remains controversial among scientists.  Many of these studies report that ELF exposures are related to increased risk of breast cancer (not all studies report such effects, but then, we do not expect 100% or even 50% consistency in results in science, and do not require it to take reasonable preventative action).

"The evidence from studies on women in the workplace rather strongly suggests that ELF is a risk factor for breast cancer for women with long-term exposures of 10 mG and higher.

"Breast cancer studies of people who work in relatively high ELF exposures (10 mG and above) show higher rates of this disease.  Most studies of workers who are exposed to ELF have defined high exposure levels to be somewhere between 2 mG and 10 mG; however this kind of mixing of relatively low to relatively high ELF exposure just acts to
dilute out real risk levels.  Many of the occupational studies group exposures so that the highest group is exposed to 4 mG and above.  What this means is that a) few people are exposed to much higher levels and b) illness patterns show up at relatively low ELF levels of 4 mG and above.  This is another way of demonstrating that existing ELF limits that are set at 933-1000 mG are irrelevant to the exposure levels reporting increased risks.

"Laboratory studies that examine human breast cancer cells have shown that ELF exposure between 6 mG and 12 mG can interfere with protective effects of melatonin that fights the growth of these breast cancer cells.  For a decade, there has been evidence that human breast cancer cells grow faster if exposed to ELF at low environmental levels.  This is thought to be because ELF exposure can reduce melatonin levels in the body.   The presence of melatonin in breast cancer cell cultures is known to reduce the growth of cancer cells.  The absence of melatonin (because of ELF exposure or other reasons) is known to result in more cancer cell growth.

"Given the very high lifetime risks for developing breast cancer, and the critical importance of prevention; ELF exposures should be reduced for all people who are in high ELF environments for prolonged periods of time.

"Reducing ELF exposure is particularly important for people who have breast cancer.  The recovery environment should have low ELF levels given the evidence for poorer survival rates for childhood leukemia patients in ELF fields over 2 mG or 3 mG.  Preventative action for those who may be at higher risk for breast cancer is also warranted (particularly for those taking tamoxifen as a way to reduce the risk of getting breast cancer, since in addition to reducing the effectiveness of melatonin, ELF exposure may also reduce the effectiveness of tamoxifen at these same low exposure levels).  There is no excuse for ignoring the substantial body of evidence we already have that supports an association between breast cancer and ELF exposure; waiting for conclusive evidence is untenable given the enormous costs and societal and personal burdens caused by this disease.

"These are just some of the cancer issues to discuss.  It may be reasonable now to make the assumption that all cancers, and other disease endpoints might be related to, or worsened by exposures to EMFs (both ELF and RF).

Changes in the Nervous System and Brain Function

"Exposure to electromagnetic fields has been studies in connection with Alzheimer’s disease, motor neuron disease and Parkinson’s disease. (4)  These diseases all involve the death of specific neurons and may be classified as neurodegenerative diseases. There is evidence that high levels of amyloid beta are a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease, and exposure to ELF can increase this substance in the brain.  There is considerable evidence that melatonin can protect the brain against damage leading to Alzheimer’s disease, and also strong evidence that exposure to ELF can reduce melatonin levels.  Thus it is hypothesized that one of the body’s main protections against developing Alzheimer’s disease (melatonin) is less available to the body when people are exposed to ELF. Prolonged exposure to ELF fields could alter calcium (Ca2+) levels in neurons and induce oxidative stress (4).   It is also possible that prolonged exposure to ELF fields may stimulate neurons (particularly large motor neurons) into synchronous firing, leading to damage by the buildup of toxins.

"Evidence for a relationship between exposure and the neurodegenerative diseases, Alzheimer’s and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), is strong and relatively consistent.

"Alzheimer’s disease is a disease of the nervous system.  There is strong evidence that long-term exposure to ELF is a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease.

"Laboratory studies show that the nervous system of both humans and animals is sensitive to ELF and RF.  Measurable changes in brain function and behavior occur at levels associated with new technologies including cell phone use. Exposing humans to cell phone radiation can change brainwave activity at levels as low as 0.1 watt per kilogram SAR (W/Kg)*** in comparison to the US allowable level of 1.6 W/Kg and the International Commission for Non-ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) allowable level of 2.0 W/Kg.  It can affect memory and learning.  It can affect normal brainwave activity.  ELF and RF exposures at low levels are able to change behavior in animals.

"There is little doubt that electromagnetic fields emitted by cell phones and cell phone use affect electrical activity of the brain.

"Changes in the way in which the brain and nervous system react depend very much on the specific exposures. Most studies only look at short-term effects, so the long-term consequences of exposures are not known.

"There is large variability in the results of ELF and RF testing, which would be expected based on the large variability of factors that can influence test results.  However, it is clearly demonstrated that under some conditions of exposure, the brain and nervous system functions of humans are altered.  The consequence of long-term or prolonged exposures have not been thoroughly studied in either adults or in children.

"The consequence of prolonged exposures to children, whose nervous systems continue to develop until late adolescence, is unknown at this time.  This could have serious implications to adult health and functioning in society if years of exposure of the young to both ELF and RF result in diminished capacity for thinking, judgment, memory, learning, and control over behavior.

"People who are chronically exposed to low-level wireless antenna emissions report symptoms such as problems in sleeping (insomnia), fatigue, headache, dizziness, grogginess, lack of concentration, memory problems, ringing in the ears (tinnitus), problems with balance and orientation, and difficulty in multi-tasking.  In children, exposures to cell phone radiation have resulted in changes in brain oscillatory activity during some memory tasks.  Although scientific studies as yet have not been able to confirm a cause-and-effect relationship; these complaints are widespread and the cause of significant public concern in some countries where wireless technologies are fairly mature and widely distributed (Sweden, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, Austria, Greece, Israel). For example, the roll-out of the 3rd Generation wireless phones (and related community-wide antenna RF emissions in the Netherlands) caused almost immediate public complaints of illness.

"Conflicting results from those few studies that have been conducted may be based on the difficulty in providing non-exposed environments for testing to compare to environments that are intentionally exposed.  People traveling to laboratories for testing are pre-exposed to a multitude of RF and ELF exposures, so they may already be symptomatic prior to actual testing.  Also complicating this is good evidence that RF exposures testing behavioral changes show delayed results; effects are observed after termination of RF exposure.  This suggests a persistent change in the nervous system that may be evident only after time has passed, so is not observed during a short testing period.

Effects on Genes (DNA)

"The European research program (REFLEX) documented many changes in normal biological functioning in tests on DNA. The significance of these results is that such effects are directly related to the question of whether human health risks might occur, when these changes in genes and DNA happen. This large research effort produced information on EMFs effects from more than a dozen different researchers.

"Both ELF and RF exposures can be considered genotoxic (will damage DNA) under certain conditions of exposure, including exposure levels that are lower than existing safety limits.

Effects on Stress Proteins (Heat Shock Proteins)

"Very low-level ELF and RF exposures can cause cells to produce stress proteins, meaning that the cell recognizes ELF and RF exposures as harmful.  This is another important way in which scientists have documented that ELF and RF exposures can be harmful, and it happens at levels far below the existing public safety standards.

"An additional concern is that if the stress goes on too long, the protective effect is diminished. There is a reduced response if the stress goes on too long, and the protective effect is reduced. This means the cell is less protected against damage, and it is why prolonged or chronic exposures may be quite harmful, even at very low intensities.

Effects on the Immune System

"There is substantial evidence that ELF and RF can cause inflammatory reactions, allergy reactions and change normal immune function at levels allowed by current public safety standards.

"The body’s immune defense system senses danger from ELF and RF exposures, and targets an immune defense against these fields, much like the body’s reaction in producing stress proteins. These are additional indicators that very low intensity ELF and RF exposures are a) recognized by cells and b) can cause reactions as if the exposure is harmful.  Chronic exposure to factors that increase allergic and inflammatory responses on a continuing basis are likely to be harmful to health.  Chronic inflammatory responses can lead to cellular, tissue and organ damage over time. Many chronic diseases are thought to be related to chronic problems with immune system function.

"There is very clear evidence that exposures to ELF and RF at levels associated with cell phone use, computers, video display terminals, televisions, and other sources can cause these skin reactions.  Changes in skin sensitivity have been measured by skin biopsy, and the findings are remarkable.  Some of these reactions happen at levels equivalent to those of wireless technologies in daily life. Mast cells are also found in the brain and heart, perhaps targets of immune response by cells responding to ELF and RF exposures, and this might account for some of the other symptoms commonly reported (headache, sensitivity to light, heart arrhythmias and other cardiac symptoms).  Chronic provocation byexposure to ELF and RF can lead to immune dysfunction, chronic allergic responses, inflammatory diseases and ill health if they occur on a continuing basis over time.

Plausible Biological Mechanisms

"Plausible biological mechanisms are already identified that can reasonably account for most biological effects reported for exposure to RF and ELF at low-intensity levels (oxidative stress and DNA damage from free radicals leading to genotoxicity; molecular mechanisms at very low energies are plausible links to disease, e.g., effect on electron transfer rates linked to oxidative damage, DNA activation linked to abnormal biosynthesis and mutation).    It is also important to remember that traditional public health and epidemiological determinations do not require a proven mechanism  before inferring a causal link between EMFs exposure and disease.

"Oxidative stress through the action of free radical damage to DNA is a plausible biological mechanism for cancer and diseases that involve damage from ELF to the central nervous system.

Cite:
(1) http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec01_2007_summary_for_public.pdf

The complete BioInitiative Report:
http://www.bioinitiative.org/table-of-contents/
avatar
George Tirebiter

Posts : 55
Points : 731
Reputation : 132
Join date : 2016-02-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Cell Tower Microwave Radiation

Post by Schpankme on Thu Mar 24, 2016 4:25 am

George Tirebiter wrote:

In today’s world, everyone is exposed to two types of EMFs:
(1) extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF) from electrical and electronic appliances and power lines
(2) radiofrequency radiation (RF) from wireless devices such as cell phones and cordless phones, cellular antennas and towers, and broadcast transmission towers.

ELF and RF are non-ionizing radiation
they do not have sufficient energy to break off electrons from their orbits around atoms and ionize (charge) the atoms

ELF and RF exposures
electromagnetic radiation causes biological changes - may lead to loss of well being, disease and even death.

Childhood Leukemia and Other Childhood Cancers
power lines and other sources of ELF are consistently associated with higher rates of childhood leukemia
Leukemia is the most common type of cancer in children.

Brain Tumors and Acoustic Neuromas
cell phone and cordless phone exposure linked to increased risk for brain tumors

Other Adult Cancers
Breast Cancer
Effects on Genes (DNA)
Effects on the Immune System


George,

I understand the above may not be your words, but I want to break down whats being said and the story being conveyed.

Lets start with the Science Fiction (Scientism)
"non-ionizing radiation do not have sufficient energy to break off electrons from their orbits around atoms and ionize (charge) the atoms"

The "atom" is nothing more then theory to give objects the same building blocks.
The "electron" is also theory used to describe the electromagnetic force, which is said to travel via "atoms" inside the conductor.

So, as we dive into this "ELF and RF radiation" one must ask, how much of this is fear mongering based on Scientism?

Childhood Leukemia and Other Childhood Cancers, Dr John McDougall
"Leukemia is the most common type of cancer in children"
Widespread Infection with Leukemia Virus from eating Meat and Dairy - 9 out of 10 dairy cows within the USA (89%) are infected with leukemia virus.  This means millions of cows presently have live, infectious, leukemia viruses -- bovine leukemia virus -- living inside them.  These viruses are known to cause cancers of the immune system, called leukemias and lymphomas, in these cows.  More startling will be the reaction when they learn that consuming tainted beef has already infected as many as 74% of people living within the USA.
GOT MILK?

References:
Buehring GC, Philpott SM, Choi KY.  Humans have antibodies reactive with Bovine leukemia virus.  2003 Dec;19(12):1105-13.

...
Other Adult Cancers and the immune System, Joel Fuhrman M.D.
Breast Cancer
Effects on Genes (DNA)
Effects on the Immune System

Frequent consumption of animal products increases the risk of many cancers, including bladder cancer, brain cancer, breast cancer, colon cancer, endometrial cancer, intestinal cancer, kidney cancer, leukaemia, lung cancer, lymphoma, oropharyngeal cancer, ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer, skin cancer and stomach cancer.

Scientists suggest that this link between obesity and cancer is due to excess fat increasing levels of sex steroids and other hormones that promote cancer growth. Also the reduced immune function and elevated oxidative stress associated with excess body fat may contribute to the initiation of cancer by damaging DNA.

References:
Fraser GE. Association between diet and cancer, ischemic heart disease, and all-cause mortality in non-Hispanic white California Seventh-Day Adventists. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;70(3 supp.):532-38S. Sarasua S, Savitz DA. Cured and broiled meat consumption in relation to childhood cancer. Cancer Causes Control 1994;5(2):141-48. Favero A, Parpinel M, Franceschi S. Diet and risk of breast cancer: major findings from an Italian case-control study. Biomed Pharmacother 1998;52(3):109-15. Levi F, Pasche C, La Vecchia C, Lucchini F, Franceschi S. Food groups and colorectal cancer risk. Br J Cancer 1999;79( 7 - 8 ):1283-87.
...

Now, does "ELF and RF radiation" cause cancer or destroy the immune system in animals having a Mother, Face, and Blood?  
How will we know, clearly just about everyone tested consumes an animal based diet of High Fat and Cholesterol.

Can exposure to "ELF and RF radiation" increase the risk of cancer and also destroy the immune system in animals?
How would they know, their victims were already part of a high-risk group for cancer and other immune system related diseases.

Could what were told about exposure to "ELF and RF radiation" be fear mongering?
Yes, fear is the number one commodity sold across the face of the Earth.
avatar
Schpankme

Posts : 488
Points : 2120
Reputation : 1032
Join date : 2015-12-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Cell Tower Microwave Radiation

Post by George Tirebiter on Thu Mar 24, 2016 7:21 pm

Schpankme,

I would appreciate it if you spared the condescension going forward.

The tactic of labeling something as 'scientism' doesn't automatically eliminate its validity, and make it science fiction.

This designation is going to quickly lose any meaning at all if it is loosely applied to discredit some bit of information one doesn't happen to agree with.

You make some good points about excessive meat/dairy eating and its potential negative effects, but one can also interpret an extreme focus on this as a form of fear mongering.

Labeling something as fear mongering has become a popular tactic used to stop discussion on specific subjects.

The discussion of EMF as a contributory cause of disease doesn't eliminate other additional causes.

Your statements give a clear indication that you have strong resistance to the idea that non-native EMF has strong negative effects on the human body.

Why such a resistance?

Dismissing the research done by shifting the focus to additional potential health affecting factors doesn't eliminate the effects of non-native EMF.

Shifting the focus of discussion is also a popular tactic used to derail discussion.

It's clear that many people are heavily addicted to devices that emit non-native EMF frequencies and most will not stop using those devices even if they end up being strongly warned of potential negative health effects.

There are those, however, that may be interested in optimizing their health and will search for ways to mitigate the negative effects.

Attempting to create confusion by suggesting these people narrow their focus to the negative effects of meat/dairy eating actually does them a disservice in their search for optimal health.

Cheers
avatar
George Tirebiter

Posts : 55
Points : 731
Reputation : 132
Join date : 2016-02-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

EMF and Autoimmunity

Post by George Tirebiter on Thu Mar 24, 2016 10:43 pm

"Most people in the alternative healthcare field believe that autoimmunity is some how tied to the leaky gut, altered BBB, or leakiness on the inner mitochondrial membrane, or via the use of dietary grains and/or modern dairy products. The problem is most have no idea how they really connect back to the electromagnetic field effects.

"Autoimmunity is directly tied to an alteration of the electromagnetic field that our cells live in. The field has radically changed since 1893 when the surface of the planet was changed by electrification. The electric field in our house uses 60 Hz systems. This has been shown by Robert O. Becker and by Nancy Wertheimer to be enough change to cause a big change to DNA. As the luxury of electricity grew, it fueled the growth of the industrial revolution and the development of modern technology over the last century. This is precisely when all modern disease began to show up, and they have exploded as the frequencies of EMF fields have increased. This one change has lead to massive increases in man-made EMF that now is present in the resonant cavity of the Earth. This is the space between the surface of the planet and the ionosphere.

"Becker’s work in the 1950s and 1960s showed that any time an EMF field was introduced to the brain stem of any animal he tested, it resulted in a “stress response” from the animal. Today we call this stress response leptin resistance or adrenal fatigue at the brainstem level."(1)

What causes this? Loss of control of the calcium voltage channels in neurons is the short answer. The altered field increases the frequency of the resonant EMF around the Earth and it opens the calcium voltage gated channels in neurons in the CNS and PNS. This is the real cause of most of the modern diseases we see today. Because EMF energies are absorbed into tissues in differential rates, we see a large spectrum of effects, and we do not see the same disease. What underpins everyone of them, however, is the spike of cytokines in the effected tissue.

"Becker found the biologic effects were due to an altered DC current coming from Schwann cells that myelinate the neurons of the peripheral nervous system.

"When there is a lack of myelination, we have a decreased regenerative current for many systems in the body. The mechanism is ultimately tied to calcium efflux out of these cells. When the net electromagnetic effect on the brain and the endogenous immune system is highly powered it directly diminishes the DC current coming from brain and nervous system’s myelin sheaths. These DC currents have been shown in all mammals to allow us to be able to use our bodies natural systems to both heal and regenerate physiologic systems.

"Biophysicists have found these effects 50 years ago. The cellular mechanism is linked directly to a calcium homeostasis which alters cellular signaling in many ways. Many want to blame a food substance, but it is 100% tied to an altered field effect. Biophysics and the laws of nature show you how it happens. Foods exacerbate the condition but they do not cause it. This is also why autoimmune diseases were unheard of in the medical literature before 1893. We had not yet electrified the planet’s surface to alter the field yet.

"The Earth magnetic field resonates at 7.83 Hertz. This ionic resonance is what dictates how cations like calcium and magnesium work in circadian biology and in our neurons. When the EMF field becomes altered for any reason at all we lose ionic control of these cations, we dehydrate, and we spill out calcium from our cells. When cells lose calcium they can not signal properly. This can lead to autoimmunity, childhood cancers, and altered embryology, and genetic defects.

"Few people understand how nature’s laws interact with DNA. Even fewer people know that this too has been studied and proven. Water hydrogen bonding network is controlled by the EMF field it is found in. 71% of our cellular weight is made from water for a reason. The micropulsations of the Earth magnetic field creates a resonant cavity on Earth. In this cavity it contains a low frequency ELF EMF called the Schumann resonance. Water electrifies DNA and RNA in this resonant cavity. It was a controversial point for many years until Christophe Yamahata at Tokyo University and Kawaga University convincingly demonstrated the ability of DNA to transport an electrical charge. It 100% depends upon the water inside a cell.

"Becker, Wertheimer, Marino, and Savitz all found childhood cancers in multiple generations of animals whose parents germ cells were expose to magnetic fields above the native Schumann frequency. Today the levels of this EMF frequency has increased 2 million times since the studies mentioned and cited in this blog were completed in 1979. This was also done and proven in animal and human cells long ago but no one seems to know it because they do not read biophysics work.

"DNA has been shown experimentally to be controlled by a magnetic field. Genetic expression is directly tied to the electromagnetic field that life lives in. To deny it is to deny experiments already proving it is true.

"Schumann resonances occur because the space between the surface of the Earth and the conductive ionosphere acts as a closed waveguide. The limited dimensions of the Earth cause this waveguide to act as a resonant cavity for electromagnetic waves in the ELF band. The cavity is naturally excited by electric currents in lightning. Schumann resonances are the principal background in the electromagnetic spectrum between 3 and 69 Hz, and appear as distinct peaks at extremely low frequencies (ELF) around 7.83, 14.3, 20.8, 27.3 and 33.8 Hz.

"The shape of the Earth Magnetic field is radically changed in the last 50 years. We are completely unaware of what we do not know with regards to electromagnetic waves and particles. The non-thermal effects of EMF from an altered field results in all biochemical and physical constants also being altered.

Cite:
(1) Energy and Epigenetics 3: Autoimmunity, Cancer, Autism
http://jackkruse.com/energy-and-epigenetics-3-autoimmunity-cancer-autism/
August 31, 2013 By Jack Kruse, M.D.
avatar
George Tirebiter

Posts : 55
Points : 731
Reputation : 132
Join date : 2016-02-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Cell Tower Microwave Radiation

Post by csp on Fri Mar 25, 2016 12:09 am

George, while some of your other posts are great, I seem to agree with Schpankme on this - there is no real science behind what this folks are suggesting (they are all appear to be "opinions").

Jack Kruse, M.D. is promoting paleo diet which goes against all we know about nutrition and the effect of animal products on the human body. His website is also full of "stores" to buy his products, and recommended products along with "bootcamps" and "exclusive clubs" - profiteering off peoples ill-health always raises a red flag for me, especially when promoting pseudo-science.

While I believe there could be negative effects from radio towers/cell towers and power lines, I believe they are simply overstated as we can see without a doubt that eating a whole foods plant based diet (even while being surrounded by these things) can prevent, treat and sometimes reverse disease.
avatar
csp

Posts : 338
Points : 1753
Reputation : 838
Join date : 2016-01-04
Location : Australia

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Cell Tower Microwave Radiation

Post by Schpankme on Fri Mar 25, 2016 1:01 am

George Tirebiter wrote:
Autoimmunity is directly tied to an alteration of the electromagnetic field that our cells live in.

The electric field in our house uses 60 Hz systems.
This has been shown by Robert O. Becker and by Nancy Wertheimer to be enough change to cause a big change to DNA.

This is precisely when all modern disease began to show up, and they have exploded as the frequencies of EMF fields have increased.


George,

How will we know if EMF can cause or increase the risk of "modern disease"?  I don't know, we'll review the information you provided and find out.

History Lesson:

cyclotron
A cyclotron is a type of particle accelerator invented by Ernest O. Lawrence in 1932.

Ernest Lawrence was a pioneering American nuclear scientist and winner of the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1939 for his invention of the cyclotron. He is known for his work on uranium-isotope separation for the Manhattan Project, for founding the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.  After the war, Lawrence campaigned extensively for government sponsorship of Big Science with its requirements for Big Machines and Big Money, and in 1946 he asked the Manhattan Project for over $2 million for research at the Radiation Laboratory. By 1946, the Manhattan Project spent $7 on physics at the University of California for every dollar spent by the University.

Cyclotrons were the best source of high-energy beams for nuclear physics experiments
In the nonrelativistic approximation, the frequency does not depend upon the radius of the particle's orbit, since the particle's mass is constant. As the beam spirals out, its frequency does not decrease, and it must continue to accelerate, as it is travelling a greater distance in the same time period. In contrast to this approximation, as particles approach the speed of light, their relativistic mass increases...

Here's the cite you provided:  http://jackkruse.com/energy-and-epigenetics-3-autoimmunity-cancer-autism/

"Robert O. Becker and Carl F. Blackman are critical in understanding how a field effect can cause an autoimmune disease."

"Blackman was a research scientist at the Environmental Carcinogenesis Division of the EPA.  Blackman and Libroff combined a static (DC) and an alternating (AC) magnetic field on human cells. They found doing so caused an increase of the concentration of free calcium ions in nervous tissues in a very narrow resonance window of the AC magnetic field. The maximum calcium efflux from neurons corresponded to the cyclotron frequency of the calcium ions."

"This cyclotron ion resonance is very important to understand in space medicine when the solar magnetic field becomes altered for any reason."

"NASA released an article according to which ion cyclotron waves were identified by their solar probe spacecraft called WIND..."
"The solar wind is believed to be what burned off Mars’ magnetic field and sterilized the planet of all life."

'The great pandemic of influenza in the early 20th century was tied to an alteration of the solar wind and the Earth’s magnetic field."
"...influenza world wide that killed close to 5% of the world’s population."


Is EMF causing disease?  I don't know, there's nothing tangible here to base that decision on.  One thing does stand out, there will be no end to the funding required to promote the Religion of theoretical physics.


Here's food for thought:

How Autoimmune Diseases Form, Dr. John McDougall

"The one cell layer in your gut gets destroyed by a virus, drugs, different toxins or the food you eat. Once that one cell layer in your gut gets destroyed and you consume animal proteins, they can then leak out of your gut and into the bloodstream. Once in the bloodstream your body produces antibodies to combat these animal proteins that look like viruses to your body. Due to molecular mimicry these antibodies for the animal proteins look like ones made for different parts of your own body.

In the case of type I diabetes the body makes antibodies for the animal proteins in your blood that also look similar to antibodies made for the pancreas and essentially your own immune system starts to kill off the cells of the pancreas until the pancreas can no longer secrete insulin. Different autoimmune diseases can form in a very similar fashion but instead of attacking the pancreas they will attack the central nervous system in the case of multiple sclerosis or the thyroid in Hashimoto's Thyroiditis. So how do you reverse autoimmune diseases? Simple, stop eating animal products!"
avatar
Schpankme

Posts : 488
Points : 2120
Reputation : 1032
Join date : 2015-12-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Cell Tower Microwave Radiation

Post by George Tirebiter on Fri Mar 25, 2016 1:05 am

CSP,

I have to say, I wondered if this sort of approach would start to occur by some poster(s) on this site.

It's unfortunate to see the double-teaming that's normally only used by some shills.

You best do a bit more research on this subject before claiming there is no real science here and don't discount Kruse because he doesn't subscribe to your own belief system.

By the way, who is the we in "all we know about nutrition"?

Is that the royal we?

Are you claiming that the jury is in on the secret to health?

That's quite a tall claim.

Yes, the Earth is undoubtedly flat but that doesn't mean that everything else is also finally proven.

Especially when it comes to nutrition and health.

It's far to cavalier to make the claim that "we" have the final answer.

Kruse doesn't promote a Paleo diet. You would need to take a much deeper look at his information before you could even attempt to explain what he focuses on.

If you ignore everyone that doesn't totally subscribe to your belief system you're going to end up in a highly insulated ignorant cult mentality.

I've read a lot of posts on this site and there's plenty of clearly unfounded "Opinions" that are completely unchallenged, including some of the health related claims and your own 'opinions' above.

You might do what I do and realize that any post that fully documents all of the information shared would be so long that almost no one is going to read it.

And yes, just like your claims above, there will be some opinion, of course.

So....as with a lot of other information posted here, the reader is left to research deeper if they're interested and ignore any opinions as they choose.

You should know by now that just because some researcher or food guru or individual makes a claim about a mode of eating being the be all and end all of health, that the claim is not necessarily true.

There's no doubt that eating a better diet can potentially help to improve one's health, but my suggestion is to keep your mind a bit more open to more than just one narrow perspective if you're interested in health.

Cheers
avatar
George Tirebiter

Posts : 55
Points : 731
Reputation : 132
Join date : 2016-02-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Cell Tower Microwave Radiation

Post by George Tirebiter on Fri Mar 25, 2016 1:30 am

Schpankme,

You're getting lost in the weeds here.

Just like not every bit of information you're proposing is worth paying attention to, given your own particular beliefs, not every comment from Kruse is worth paying attention to.

But, depending on your interests, he has a lot to offer, just as do some on this forum.

If you only pay attention to those that believe exactly as you do then you'll end up in a very insulated reality with a very narrow viewpoint.

Your avid attack of the information presented indicates that you have some sort of vested interest in preventing this information from being shared with other forum members.

Given that there is a lot of unfounded and unchallenged information already posted on this site, your eagerness to attack here, seems a bit extreme, to say the least.

Why is that?

What is your agenda with this?
avatar
George Tirebiter

Posts : 55
Points : 731
Reputation : 132
Join date : 2016-02-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Cell Tower Microwave Radiation

Post by csp on Fri Mar 25, 2016 1:37 am

George Tirebiter wrote:
I have to say, I wondered if this sort of approach would start to occur by some poster(s) on this site.

It's unfortunate to see the double-teaming that's normally only used by some shills.

I have no affiliation with Schpankme, other than being registered on this forum - in fact Schpankme has led me to question a few of beliefs/opinions deeper in the past based on my own posts containing psuedo-scientific references (e.g. Heavy water thread).

George Tirebiter wrote:
You best do a bit more research on this subject before claiming there is no real science here and don't discount Kruse because he doesn't subscribe to your own belief system.

I've read everything you have posted, and I always will before commenting. Where are the studies? Where is the raw data? There are even references to "earths magnetic field" with support from NASA "science" - which we are vehemently opposed to here. NASA does not conduct science.

George Tirebiter wrote:
By the way, who is the we in "all we know about nutrition"?

Is that the royal we?

Are you claiming that the jury is in on the secret to health?

That's quite a tall claim.

I use we, as a collective for this forum, please see the bodies of research posted in the vegan thread titled "Don't eat your friends". And yes, for me the case is closed on the basics for good human health; as I'm sure it is for most others here who have taken the time to work through all the data.


George Tirebiter wrote:
Yes, the Earth is undoubtedly flat but that doesn't mean that everything else is also finally proven.

Especially when it comes to nutrition and health.

It's far to cavalier to make the claim that "we" have the final answer.

See above, I believe we do have the answer - high carbohydrate whole plant food based diet, exercise daily and get your sun.

George Tirebiter wrote:
Kruse doesn't promote a Paleo diet. You would need to take a much deeper look at his information before you could even attempt to explain what he focuses on.

If you ignore everyone that doesn't totally subscribe to your belief system you're going to end up in a highly insulated ignorant cult mentality.

He does promote a Paleo diet, it's literally a menu option on his website, along with a book. Why would he title something "Epi-Paleo" if he does not promote paleo?


George Tirebiter wrote:
I've read a lot of posts on this site and there's plenty of clearly unfounded "Opinions" that are completely unchallenged, including some of the health related claims and your own 'opinions' above.

You might do what I do and realize that any post that fully documents all of the information shared would be so long that almost no one is going to read it.

And yes, just like your claims above, there will be some opinion, of course.

So....as with a lot of other information posted here, the reader is left to research deeper if they're interested and ignore any opinions as they choose.

You should know by now that just because some researcher or food guru or individual makes a claim about a mode of eating being the be all and end all of health, that the claim is not necessarily true.

There's no doubt that eating a better diet can potentially help to improve one's health, but my suggestion is to keep your mind a bit more open to more than just one narrow perspective if you're interested in health.

Cheers

Sure there is plenty of speculation here in other threads, but it is noted as such and debated - yet there are topics such as health and nutrition, which are not speculation - it is backed up with real science, and real results.

I have a hard time believing eating meat, dairy or eggs (essentially paleo) in any capacity could benefit anyone's health based on decades of research showing the complete opposite. The only sceince I see supporting this, is funded by the billion dollar industries trying to keep their poisonous and cruel products on the market.
avatar
csp

Posts : 338
Points : 1753
Reputation : 838
Join date : 2016-01-04
Location : Australia

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Cell Tower Microwave Radiation

Post by Schpankme on Fri Mar 25, 2016 1:41 am

George Tirebiter wrote:

not every comment from Kruse is worth paying attention to.

But, depending on your interests, he has a lot to offer, just as do some on this forum.

your eagerness to attack here, seems a bit extreme, to say the least.

Why is that?

What is your agenda with this?


The Epi-Paleo Rx Easy Start Guide, by JACK KRUSE

"DHA is designed to be in our cell membranes"
"DHA from seafood or grass-fed meat is probably the most important part of food quality.  
"The Epi-Paleo Rx is the foundation of the program’s success."
"This Easy Start Guide should provide you everything you need to know about executing the Epi-paleo Rx."

George, can you comprehend what you read?
avatar
Schpankme

Posts : 488
Points : 2120
Reputation : 1032
Join date : 2015-12-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Cell Tower Microwave Radiation

Post by George Tirebiter on Fri Mar 25, 2016 1:50 am

CSP,

Thanks for making your beliefs clear.
I now have a better idea what your closed/verbotten subjects are, unless your beliefs are affirmed appropriately.
Although your selective 'real science' is obviously a blind-spot for you.
Carry on....
avatar
George Tirebiter

Posts : 55
Points : 731
Reputation : 132
Join date : 2016-02-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Cell Tower Microwave Radiation

Post by csp on Fri Mar 25, 2016 2:22 am

George Tirebiter wrote:CSP,

Thanks for making your beliefs clear.
I now have a better idea what your closed/verbotten subjects are, unless your beliefs are affirmed appropriately.
Although your selective 'real science' is obviously a blind-spot for you.
Carry on....

Real science requires real results, where are Dr Kruse's results? I have to buy his book? Or purchase exclusive access to his club? Or should I just take your word for it that he "doesn't promote paleo" (when it's abundantly clear he does) and that his own personal experience is fact rather than fiction?

You are showing your own beliefs in pseudo science and trying to hide it by attacking my beliefs, which are rooted in observable, repeatable science - I suggest starting with vegan thread, and reading every page, every article, every cited source - you will soon realize that arguing against such a comprehensive tome of research is inane.

And to note, I have no doubt there are some negative effects to being around cell/radio towers and power lines as I stated in my first post - however posting opinions from a paleo pushing psuedo-scientist with references to NASA data is not what is considered research around here.
avatar
csp

Posts : 338
Points : 1753
Reputation : 838
Join date : 2016-01-04
Location : Australia

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Cell Tower Microwave Radiation

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum