White Genocide

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: White Genocide

Post by lizardking on Wed Feb 03, 2016 4:01 pm

Post by schpankme

Neil has all the answers to your Theory Based Education.



Here BP (British Petroleum) is selling something, but it's not Fuel.


avatar
lizardking

Posts : 1781
Points : 5075
Reputation : 2557
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 23
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: White Genocide

Post by Animal Sanctuary on Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:44 pm

Migrants sexually harass German School Girls - Mayor dismisses Grandfather: "Don't provoke them and don't walk in these areas"

Germans can't walk in their own city anymore.

avatar
Animal Sanctuary

Posts : 55
Points : 869
Reputation : 165
Join date : 2016-01-12

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: White Genocide

Post by mitch on Fri Feb 12, 2016 8:13 pm

Hungarian Woman Speaks Out Against the Betrayal of European Women and is Called a ‘Racist’

According to the Women’s rights and Gender Equality (FEMM) Committee of the European Parliament it is only racism that may lead someone who sees any problem in the mass violence committed against women in Europe by migrant men.

Every day there are instances of European women being subjected to sexual abuses, insults, violent actions that force the European women to rethink and reorganize their daily lives and activities – and this matter is “of course” not even on the agenda of the European Parliament, nor on the women’s rights committee’s.

In other words: the European Parliament does not care about the fact that there were around thousand instances of violence against European women by migrant men in Cologne, and not on New Year’s Eve alone.

Krisztina Morvai, Non-Attached Member of the European Parliament and of the FEMM Committee, broke the ice and pointed out that this matter had to be dealt with and called this lack of concern of the committee “an absolute betrayal of European women”. The answer was given by Mary Honeyball, the (socialist) rapporteur of the report on the situation of women refugees and asylum seekers in the EU: Morvai is racist and this is what motivates her by raising this issue.

avatar
mitch

Posts : 89
Points : 962
Reputation : 213
Join date : 2016-01-08
Location : Northumbria

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: White Genocide

Post by mitch on Fri Feb 12, 2016 8:15 pm

The Swedish National Police Commissioner shows a shocking display of bizarre sympathy for a criminal Somali murderer of an innocent 22-year-old Swedish girl who was trying to break up a fight between two migrant delinquents.
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/01/25/europe/sweden-asylum-seeker-stabs-woman/

avatar
mitch

Posts : 89
Points : 962
Reputation : 213
Join date : 2016-01-08
Location : Northumbria

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: White Genocide

Post by mitch on Fri Feb 12, 2016 8:23 pm

Mass Immigration isn’t about Economics or Enrichment, it is about Racial and Cultural Ruination





The focus on immigration has centred on the Islamic issue in recent years because it has been the most obvious symptom of mass immigration, and especially recently with events in Germany it has become a major talking point. People talk about the Islamic issue as if it is the only issue, but it isn’t, Islam is a symptom of a much bigger disease which is enforced multiculturalism and mass immigration as a whole. Organisations that focus only on the mass Islamic immigration we have seen, but ignore all other immigration and actually say they support multiculturalism and only oppose Islamic extremism are actually part of the problem.


Of course Islam is a problem, it is a massive problem, but the reason we have over 50 million Muslims in Europe is because of the all encompassing phenomenon of mass immigration which has brought to our shores a mass monolithic tide of non-European immigrants that are doing irreparable damage to the historical identity of our continent.

This brings me on to my next point. Do those people who oppose mass Islamic immigration and the manifestation of Islam in our nations and the tens of millions of Muslims now walking our European streets ever ask how we ended up in this situation? Do they ever ask who has been behind it or do they really do enough research to understand the answer to this question? Or do they ignore it and believe that all of these Muslims just arrived in Europe one sunny day with nobody noticing? Do they not question who would want European nations destroyed? Do they not ask who benefits? In whose interest would it be to see European homogeneity undermined and weakened? The mass immigration we have seen has not been an accident, it hasn’t been for economic reasons although huge profits have been made by a select few, it hasn’t been about diversity or enrichment, so what has it been about?

Mass Immigration in all its forms not just Islamic, is about the ruination of the racial and cultural identity of the indigenous European population. For what other purpose would it have been imposed upon us? The economic argument is a lie because you don’t replace your own people for economic reasons, we have posted about the difference between guest worker immigration for a fixed term and citizenship immigration which is permanent. If you absolutely needed immigration for economic reasons you would employ a system of guest worker immigration and not permanent race replacement immigration.

So who benefits? It is to easy to say that politicians are behind it, they are merely the public face of a hidden hand, they are puppets who implement the policies of the international financiers although political parties benefit due to voting blocs among the immigrant population, but that isn’t why they have been brought here. It is true that big business benefits, but they don’t make the decisions they simply rake in the profits of imported cheap labour, the corporations and the capitalist class would sell their own grandmother for profit and don’t care about the long term consequences of Mass Immigration so long as their profit margins are high. Mass Immigration has been used as a biological weapon against the European people, it has been a tool of divide and conquer, but who would want to divide and conquer the European people and for what reason?

There is one group of people who wield enormous and disproportionate power in European and Western nations in media and finance and who influence political decision making not just domestically but internationally.

This group have an historical enmity towards the European people that many people are unaware of and as result do not understand the true motivation behind Mass Immigration or the group responsible for it. This historical antipathy towards the West and to the European people is kept from the public consiousness because it would expose the true agenda behind Mass Immigration.

If you haven’t guessed already, I am talking about Jewish supremacists who wield this enormous and disproportionate power and who influence politicians with financial incentives to implement policies that benfit Jews as a group. It is pretty much common knowledge that Jewish money influences Western nations to support Israel, but what isn’t so well known is that the same money power influences governments to implement a policy of ‘multiculturalism’ and Mass Immigration because it benefits Jews within Western nations.

They do this because of historical animosity towards us, an act of revenge for what they call the oppression of the Jews because the Jews never do anything to bring the wrath of people whom the live amongst down upon them do they.

They do it because they feel ‘safer’ in a population that is racially and culturally mixed, because homogeneous European nations had identified Jews as a corrosive force and had kicked them out. Within a multicultural multiracial multifaith society they become just one group among many. Racial and Cultural pluralism is their safety net and is also a malevolent act of sinister intent. Another reason for their implementation of a multifaith society ie importing Islam en mass, is their hatred and fear of Christianity, at the same time as racially consious European nations had identified Jews as being a corrosive out-group, they were also predominantly Christian and viewed Jews as being anti-Christian and proceeded to expel Jews from European nations. So the motivation for Jews to promote and support ‘multiculturalism’ is both racial and religious.

This is the main reason why Europe now has 50 million Muslims among its population, and is being destroyed by Mass Immigration as a whole.

Some quotes that should leave you in no doubt whatsoever about the real reason for mass immigration:

“I think there’s a resurgence of antisemitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural, and I think we’re going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural.. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies that they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the center of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode, and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role, and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.” – Barbara Lerner Spectre

A typical example of what characterises the Jewish push for open immigration can be seen in the following 1948 quote by David Petegorsky, former Director of the AJ Congress:

“Jewish survival can only take place within the framework of a progressive and expanding democratic society, which through its institutions and public policies gives expression to the concept of cultural pluralism.”

In his 1985 book A Certain People: American Jews and Their Lives Today. Charles Silberman writes that:

“American (and European based) Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief, one firmly rooted in history, that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of American Jews to endorse “gay rights” and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called “social issues.”

Earl Raab, executive director emeritus of the Perlmutter Institute of Jewish Advocacy, an associate of the ADL (Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith) and writer for the San Francisco Jewish Bulletin, wrote:

“It was only after World War II that immigration law was drastically changed to eliminate such discrimination. In one of the first pieces of evidence of its political coming-of-age, the Jewish community has a leadership role in effecting those changes.”

Raab goes on to celebrate the coming minority status of Whites in America. Once that has happened, he looks forward to “constitutional constraints” (restriction of freedom of speech?):

“The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.”

“We have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to ethnic bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever.”

“Arab migration has been the best thing that’s happened to Europe in the past 50 years. Arabs in Europe are a fact of life. It’s time we started to accept that there’s no way to block the migration of Chinese, Pakistanis or Arabs to Europe. … It’s true, Europe won’t be what it once was, but that’s a good thing. … [The] more migrants from Africa and Asia who arrive, the better off Europe will be. Sooner or later, their children and grandchildren will marry into veteran European families and change the demographics of their countries. Europe will be different.”

Yigal Ben-Nun, Israeli Writer in an Haaretz article 15.11.13

“For perhaps another generation, an optimistic forecast, the Jewish community will be in a position where it will be in a position to divide and conquer and enter into selective coalitions to support our agendas.” – Stephen Steinlight, “The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography.” Center for Immigration Studies, October, 2001

“We, the Greens [Green Party] have to make sure to get as many immigrants as possible into Germany. If they are in Germany, we must fight for their right to vote. When we reach that, we will have a share of the vote, we need to change this republic.” – Daniel Cohn-Bendit, (Jewish Communist) Co-president of the European Greens–European Free Alliance group in the European Parliament.

“In the modern Europe there is no room for homogeneous national states. It was an idea from 1800s, and we are going to carry it (multi-culturalism) through…and we are going to create multi-ethnic states.” – General Wesley Clark commenting on CNN after the war on Serbia.

“Jews should rejoice at the fact that Christian Europe is losing its identity as a punishment for what it did to us for the hundreds of years were in exile there.

“We will never forgive Europe’s Christians for slaughtering millions of our children, women and elderly. Not just in the recent Holocaust, but throughout the generations, in a consistent manner which characterizes all factions of hypocritical Christianity.

“And now, Europe is losing its identity in favor of another people and another religion, and there will be no remnants and survivors from the impurity of Christianity, which shed a lot of blood it won’t be able to atone for.

“Even if we are in a major war with the region’s Arabs over the Land of Israel, Islam is still much better as a gentile culture than Christianity. Jews must pray that the Islamization of most of Europe will not harm the people of Israel.” – Rabbi Baruch Efrati, a yeshiva head and community rabbi in the West Bank settlement of Efrat

Groups that ignore this crucial aspect of Mass Immigration are not only not telling the whole story, but are doing themselves a disservice. Some groups purposefully leave out this narrative because they are pro-Jewish philo semites and have Jewish influences within their organisation providing financial support this is especially true among many counter jihad groups. Again this influence is not geared towards the best interests of Europe or Europeans. What you will find is that these groups openly speak of their support for Israel when the issue at hand is not Israel but the survival of the European people. The anti-Islamic narrative of the counter jihad groups which is right in theory for our own continent, is used by the Jewish element to whip up support for Israel. Their motivation is purely to gain support for Israel and not for the preservation of the European people. An example of this kind of strategy is somebody like Melanie Phillips who comes across as being anti-Islam and anti-immigration, but is a staunch Zionist who never fails to expose her anti-Islam stance as being nothing more than a ruse for her desire to harness support for Israel. Counter Jihad groups who fall for this are being used to advance the interests of Jews and Israel and are being led astray from what is really important in terms of defending Europe.

One way in which to identify this deception is to see how these same Counter Jihad groups support multiculturalism, gays rights, and a whole host of other anti-Western subversive agendas. If these Counter Jihad groups stated their opposition to ALL immigration and the destructive concept of multiracialism and ‘diversity’ then you would see Jewish support for these groups dissappear because they would no longer be serving the overall Jewish interest. “Oppose Islamic extremism and support Israel” they say, but don’t dare acknowledge and advocate your own racial interests because that runs counter to their overall Jewish agenda. Counter Jihad groups almost never speak about race, their argument is always pushed down the road of ‘it isn’t about race’ when it has everything to do with race. They are terrified of speaking in racial terms for fear of being labeled ‘nazi’ and losing the support of Jewish finance. When was the last time you heard a Counter Jihad leader speak about the preservation of the white race?

There are some very intelligent and articulate people involved in the Counter Jihad movement, but I’m not having it that these same intelligent and articulate people who speak out about Mass Immigration and Islamic extremism are not aware of the extensive and disproportionate Jewish role in not only opening our borders, but promoting and supporting the idea of ‘multiculturalism’ just without the Islamic extremism. If this Islamic extremism didn’t exist, would the Counter Jihad groups exist? Would they still be forming groups and organising demos? Or would they then be quite happy to see European nations destroyed racially and culturally simply because Islamic extremism wasn’t an issue? Would they still receive Jewish support if they did oppose the racial and cultural annihilation of Europe? I think not.

What we are seeing across Europe is an extreme form of racial nihilism and it is even prevalent among some so-called ‘nationalist’ groups.

Nihilism is the lack of belief in anything, the rejection of all moral principles. The deliberate refusal of belief, to the point that belief itself is rejected as untenable.

Racial Nihilism:

As moral nihilism commonly asserts that morality does not exist, so racial nihilism often denies the existence of races, claiming that nothing exists to preserve or conserve. This is racial deconstructionism , the ideological annihilation of race or ideological reduction of race to nothingness, defining race out of existence by “deconstructing” its terms or classifications.

Racial nihilism is the opposite or antithesis of racial preservationism and conservationism. It is opposed to racial preservation (continued racial life), and to the conditions required for preservation (separation and reproductive isolation). In ideological terms, racial nihilism can be defined as any system of ideas, beliefs and values that opposes racial preservation and conservation, that supports or promotes the causes of racial destruction or devolution, or that denies racial rights, especially the racial right to life and the conditions of separation required for continued racial life (racial preservation). (1)

It is this refusal to accept the reality of our racial predicament that Jewish groups rely on. It should come as no surprise to learn that Jews have been at the forefront of attempts to
remove the reality of race in the minds of Europeans. (2)

To sum up, the scores of millions of Muslims on our continent represent a clear and present danger to our civilisation, this is an undeniable reality that only a fool would attempt to deny. However they make up just one part of the immigration population and despite being the most dangerous body, are part of a wider agenda which encompasses mass non-European immigration in its entirety. Islam isn’t separate, it is part of the same anti-European agenda as the mass immigration of African Christians, Sikhs, Chinese etc. They all constitute a non-European collective that are designed to displace and replace us. Continuing to ignore this only empowers and emboldens those who work towards our eventual racial and cultural demise.

(1) http://www.racialcompact.com/racialnihilism.html

(2) https://smashculturalmarxism.wordpress. ... l-warfare/
avatar
mitch

Posts : 89
Points : 962
Reputation : 213
Join date : 2016-01-08
Location : Northumbria

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: White Genocide

Post by Beashambassador on Mon Feb 15, 2016 2:07 am

George Lincoln Rockwell - University of California, Los Angeles Speech (1967)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDiJegerYCE

Synopsis from Age of Treason:
In this relatively high-quality recording of George Lincoln Rockwell speaking at UCLA 5/16/1967 he covers many topics: How a jew editor distorted hisPlayboy interview (he did not live to answer Alex Haley’s jewed theatrical vision); losing Vietnam; how he was “almost a liberal” before he saw through the lies, e.g. Churchill’s 1920 article Zionism versus Bolshevism; how jews disguise their actions by putting non-jews on top and out front; the jewishness-as-religion fraud; the kosher tax; free speech and how jews stifle opposition by keeping others from reading/hearing what they hate (e.g. Rockwell, or Madison Grant’s Conquest of a Continent); on FDR whipping up hate during WWII;the name game, and more.
avatar
Beashambassador

Posts : 117
Points : 1068
Reputation : 298
Join date : 2016-01-12
Age : 71
Location : USA

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: White Genocide

Post by Admin on Sun Feb 21, 2016 5:37 pm

avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 765
Points : 3769
Reputation : 2177
Join date : 2015-12-30

View user profile http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com

Back to top Go down

Liberalism and White Genocide

Post by George Tirebiter on Wed Mar 16, 2016 10:03 pm

What is Liberalism?

"The word liberalism has been in common use in political discourse for more than two hundred years. Why is its meaning so ambiguous and changed so dramatically over time?

"In short, it is due to a shift away from White/Aryan origins to a contemporary judaized meaning. The word itself is emblematic of the racial struggle for control of Europe.

"Liberalism:

"Originally based on two main principles: liberty (freedom from constraints on speech and thoughts) and equality (every human born possessing “natural rights”, ala John Locke).

"Contemporary, judaized liberalism is actually the opposite – granting special preferences to “protected classes”, and defining special “hate crimes” for offenses against them.

"Liberalism rejected the notions, common at the time, of hereditary privilege, state religion, absolute monarchy, and the Divine Right of Kings.

"Liberalism thus developed in opposition to the long-standing socio-political status quo in Europe, overturning and destroying it. In retrospect it was not a natural expression of European nature, but represented a revolution, a turn toward jewish rule and the complete destruction of Europeans which looms today.

"The notion that liberalism seeks equality is a fraud. The reality is that it elevates non-Whites above Whites – jews are the archetype, elevated first and highest, above everyone else.

"With the rise of the Enlightenment, the word (liberal) acquired decisively more positive undertones, being defined as “free from narrow prejudice” in 1781 and “free from bigotry” in 1823. In 1815, the first use of the word liberalism appeared in English. By the middle of the 19th century, liberal started to be used as a politicised term for parties and movements all over the world.

"The shift in meaning and spread of liberalism corresponds/correlates with the emancipation of jews. Tolerance and freedom from prejudice and bigotry enabled the jews to more easily infiltrate, manipulate and exploit White society. Here we see the beginnings of anti-”racism”.

"During the twentieth century, liberal ideas spread even further, as liberal democracies found themselves on the winning side in both world wars. Liberalism also survived major ideological challenges from new opponents, such as fascism and communism.

"The jews won those wars – securing and entrenching jewish power while disempowering Europeans. Communism was a jewish project, not an opponent of liberalism. They share major features, including central banking, internationalism, and an Orwellian drive for equality (metastasizing into anti-”racism” and ultimately anti-Whitism).

"As such, the meaning of the word “liberalism” began to diverge in different parts of the world. According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, “In the United States, liberalism is associated with the welfare-state policies of the New Deal program of the Democratic administration of Pres. Franklin D. Roosevelt, whereas in Europe it is more commonly associated with a commitment to limited government and laissez-faire economic policies.”

"These contradictory meanings reflect a different emphasis on freedom versus equality (which are at odds).

"What liberalism supposedly means:

"Despite these variations, liberal thought does exhibit a few definite and fundamental conceptions. At its very root, liberalism is a philosophy about the meaning of humanity and society. Political philosopher John Gray identified the common strands in liberal thought as being individualist, egalitarian, meliorist, and universalist. The individualist element avers the ethical primacy of the human being against the pressures of social collectivism, the egalitarian element assigns the same moral worth and status to all individuals, the meliorist element asserts that successive generations can improve their sociopolitical arrangements, and the universalist element affirms the moral unity of the human species and marginalizes local cultural differences.

"This is the “philosophy about the meaning of humanity and society” which Whites are propagandized to believe.

"Meliorism:

"Meliorism is an idea in metaphysical thinking holding that progress is a real concept leading to an improvement of the world. It holds that humans can, through their interference with processes that would otherwise be natural, produce an outcome which is an improvement over the aforementioned natural one.

"The real, jewish liberalism is completely different. It is not individualist; it is collectivist (group/bloc-oriented, identity politics, partisan politics). It is not egalitarian; non-Whites are collectively elevated above Whites, Whites are blamed for “racism”/privilege. It is not meliorist; degeneracy is promoted and celebrated, Whites excelling or progressing is regarded as evidence of “racism”/privilege. It is not universalist; it sets everyone, including Whites, against Whites.

"Liberalism, as a “philosophy about the meaning of humanity and society”, has become entangled with democracy.

"Liberal democracy:

"Liberal democracy is a form of government in which representative democracy operates under the principles of liberalism, i.e. protecting the rights of minorities and, especially, the individual. It is characterized by fair, free, and competitive elections between multiple distinct political parties, a separation of powers into different branches of government, the rule of law in everyday life as part of an open society, and the equal protection of human rights, civil rights, civil liberties, and political freedoms for all persons.

"Porter, at The Kakistocracy, describes how it works in practice:

   "Liberalism is two jews and a black voting on which white to have for lunch;

   Conservatism is a well-armed white enforcing the vote.
"

"In 1961 the poet Robert Frost remarked:

   "A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel."

"When my dictionary says that liberalism is about social progress, it forgets to say that “social progress” has been redefined by the Jews in the last 50 years. Social progress used to be about helping the lower classes who were seen as victims of society and of capitalism. But now, the white lower class has been reclassified as part of the oppressing race. It is targeted for replacement in the name of the new conception of social progress. Many left wing voters still think that social progress is about income redistribution. But in the main political parties, in colleges and in the media, social progress now centers around sexual and racial issues. Also, the Jewish left used to claim that they were the champions of freedom. And now, their priority is to shut us up.

"So, I think the word “liberalism” no longer means anything. It doesn’t refer to a coherent ideology. The Jews pretend to be liberals, which they are not. And the White liberals pretend they still believe in something, but they defer to the Jewish agenda and are held tightly in check. The incredible thing is how the non-Jews have accepted to go along with a new agenda that contradicts their former ideals.

"Instead of studying liberalism, maybe we should start studying how dictatorship works, and how the whole population of a country can come under the rule of a small hostile minority.

"In a nutshell, when people describe “liberalism” as suicidal, what they’re talking about (and denying, consciously or not) is actually the genocidal effect it’s having on Whites. The White “liberals” who aid and abet “liberalism” certainly aren’t suicidal, and neither are the “liberal” jews. Seeing contemporary “liberalism” as a death wish is closer to the truth – in the sense of wishing for someone else's death, and making that dream come true.

"There seems to be a distinct jewish origin to what little pushback there is within the jew-policed mainstream. The marker is “X isn’t a suicide pact”, e.g. where X = “liberalism” or “the constitution”. The jews, including “liberal” jews, aren’t at all trying to destroy themselves or their people, they’re doing it to Whites."(1)

A podcast by the author- Tanstaafl:
http://thewhitenetwork-archive.com/data/audio/tWn_Age_of_Treason_Radio_20140408.mp3

Cite:
(1) http://thewhitenetwork-archive.com/2014/04/08/what-is-liberalism/
avatar
George Tirebiter

Posts : 55
Points : 819
Reputation : 133
Join date : 2016-02-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: White Genocide

Post by lizardking on Tue Mar 29, 2016 11:17 pm



German kids beaten up by Muslim migrants
avatar
lizardking

Posts : 1781
Points : 5075
Reputation : 2557
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 23
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: White Genocide

Post by lizardking on Tue Apr 05, 2016 12:47 am



“People need to say good-bye to the illusion that Germany belongs to the Germans.” – Akkaya Cigdem, Vice director of the “Centre for Turkey Studies” in German newspaper WAZ.



“It’s not about justice or injustice in the immigration debate, its all about the repression of the German population in this country.” – Federal executive board of the Green Party, Munich.

“We, the Green Party, must make sure, to rack up as many foreigners as possible into Germany… when they are in Germany, we must fight for their right to vote. When we achieved this, we will have the percentage of votes that we need to change this republic.” – Daniel Cohn-Bendit, has a seat in the EU- parliament for the Green Party.



“The German nation is nothing positive for me by any means. I would even combat it politically.” – Franziska Drohsel, former leader of the youth organization of the German Socialist Party SPD



“Germany is a problem because the Germans are more gifted, more disciplined and eagerer then the rest of Europe. This will always end up in “inequalities”. But counter measures can be taken by pulling out as much money as possible out of Germany. It can be radically wasted for whatever. The main point is that Germans don’t have it. And so the world is saved.” – Joschka Fischer, 1999, former foreign minister of Germany.

“Germany has to be enclosed from outside, and by the immigration, mixed up from inside, virtually diluted.”



“It may surprise you but i’m a traitor of my country. I love and support the death of our nation.” – Christin Lochner, Politician of the German Extreme Left Party “Die Linke”

“In the year of 2100, there will be 35 million Turks in Germany. The population of the Germans will be around 20 million. That what Kamuni Sultan Suleyman began with the occupation of Vienna in the year of 1529, are we going to finish with out powerful men and our healthy women.” – Vural Oger, EU-Parliamentarian for the SPD, the German socialist party.



“The German offspring is called Mustafa, Giovanni and Ali now!” – Cem Ozdemir, federal chairman of the Green Party at the party congress in Bonn, 1998



“At national day of the Germans, the streets are drowning in a sea full of red Turkish flags and a few black-red-gold flags.” Claudia Roth, Vice federal chairman of the Green Party at “Tag det Deutschen Einheit”

“Turkey is a second home for me, I do politics for Turkey in 20 years.” – In an interview with the SPIEGEL



“Germany is vanishing more and more by every day. And I find this just fantastic.”

“I have never sung the German national anthem. And I will never do it, not even as a minister.” – Jurgen Tritten, Green party.
avatar
lizardking

Posts : 1781
Points : 5075
Reputation : 2557
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 23
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: White Genocide

Post by lizardking on Tue Apr 05, 2016 6:38 pm









Last edited by lizardking on Wed Feb 22, 2017 12:19 pm; edited 1 time in total
avatar
lizardking

Posts : 1781
Points : 5075
Reputation : 2557
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 23
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: White Genocide

Post by lizardking on Fri Jun 24, 2016 11:17 pm

EU Basics – Your Guide to the UK Brexit Referendum on EU Membership
By Professor Richard A. Werner

http://www.globalresearch.ca/eu-basics-your-guide-to-the-uk-brexit-referendum-on-eu-membership/5532351

The British people should be clear about just what they will be voting on at the EU referendum this Thursday.

What does it actually mean to stay in the EU?

What does it mean to exit?

Concerning the second question, the dominant issue in the debate has been the question whether there will be a significant negative economic impact on the UK from exiting the EU. Prime Minister David Cameron, together with the heads of the IMF, the OECD and various EU agencies have given dire warnings that economic growth will drop, the fiscal position will deteriorate, the currency will weaken and UK exports will decline precipitously. George Osborne, the chancellor of the exchequer has threatened to cut pensions if pensioners dare to vote for exit. But what are the facts?

I have been trained in international and monetary economics at the London School of Economics and have a doctorate from the University of Oxford in economics. I have studied such issues for several decades. I have also recently tested, using advanced quantitative techniques, the question of the size of impact on GDP from entry to or exit from the EU or the eurozone. The conclusion is that this makes no difference to economic growth, and everyone who claims the opposite is not guided by the facts. The reason is that economic growth and national income are almost entirely determined by a factor that is decided at home, namely the amount of bank credit created for productive purposes.

This has sadly been very small in the UK in recent decades, thus much greater economic growth is possible as soon as steps are taken to boost bank credit for productive purposes – irrespective of whether the UK stays in the EU or not (although Brexit will make it much easier to take such policy steps). We should also remember that a much smaller economy like Norway – thought more dependent on international trade – fared extremely well after its people rejected EU membership in a referendum in 1995 (which happened against the dire warnings and threats from its cross-party elites, most of its media and the united chorus of the heads of international organisations). Besides, Japan, Korea, Taiwan and China never needed EU membership to move from developing economy status to top industrialised nations within about half a century. The argument of dire economic consequences of Brexit is bogus.

As for the first question, namely what it means to stay inside the EU, we should consult the EU itself. Happily, the EU released a major official report about its key policies and what it plans to achieve in the near future in October 2015. This report was issued in the names of the „Five Presidents“ of the EU. In case you had not been aware that there was even a single, let alone five presidents of the EU, these are: The unelected president of the European Central Bank, Goldman Sachs alumnus Mario Draghi, the unelected president of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, the unelected Brussels Commissar and „president of the Eurogroup“, Jeroen Dijsselbloem, the „president of the Euro Summit“, Donald Tusk, and the president of the European Parliament, Martin Schulz. What is the message of this not negligible number of EU presidents concerning the question of where the EU is going? The title of their joint report is a give-away: „The Five President’s (sic) Report: Completing Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union“.

https://ec.europa.eu/priorities/publications/five-presidents-report-completing-europes-economic-and-monetary-union_en

The report starts with the frank admission that „with 18 million unemployed in the euro area, a lot more needs to be done to improve economic policies“ in the EU. Well said. But what exactly needs to be done?

„Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) today is like a house that was built over decades but only partially finished. When the storm hit, its walls and roof had to be stabilised quickly. It is now high time to reinforce its foundations and turn it into what EMU was meant to be…“

“ we will need to take further steps to complete EMU.“

The central planners in Brussels and at the ECB in Frankfurt are not unaware that under their command, a historically unprecedented economic dislocation has taken place in the EU during the past ten years, including massive asset and property bubbles, banking crises and large-scale unemployment in all the periphery countries – with over 50% youth unemployment in Greece, Spain and Portugal, as well as the lack of any serious controls of the EU external borders to prevent an influx of unparalleled numbers of illegal immigrants and economic migrants.

However, the EU central planners are in denial about the fact that these problems have been caused entirely by their own misguided and disastrous policies. As a result, they argue that the solution to such problems can only be further concentration of powers into their hands: „We need more Europe“, as Mrs Merkel put it (source: please read these Merkel claims about the EU

http://www.euractiv.com/section/eu-priorities-2020/news/merkel-calls-for-political-union-to-save-the-euro/)

This is what they propose to implement in the coming years, by turning all EU members into one single country.

So the Five Presidents‘ Report makes clear that the EU is not simply a free trade area. That project had been left behind with the 1992 Maastricht Treaty and a very different kind of Europe has become enshrined with the 2007 European Constitution (called ‚Lisbon Treaty‘, since the people of Europe in several referenda rejected it. Source: please read what the author of the rejected European Constitution says:

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/commentators/valeacutery-giscard-destaing-the-eu-treaty-is-the-same-as-the-constitution-398286.html ).

Instead, the EU is the project to abandon all national sovereignty and borders within and melt away all European nations that don’t succeed in exiting in time, into a merged, joint new single country, with one central European government, centralised European monetary policy, centralised European fiscal policy, centralised European foreign policy, and centralised European regulation, including of financial markets and banking. This United States of Europe, an undemocratic leviathan that the European peoples never wanted, is the culmination of the much repeated mantra of „ever closer union“.

This project has been implemented steadily and stealthily over several decades, despite major and consistent policy blunders and scandals involving the central planners (e.g. in 1999 the entire European Commission – the unelected government and cabinet of the European superstate – resigned in disgrace, as it was found to have taken bribes and engaged in fraud, while the EU’s own Court of Auditors has repeatedly refused to sign off the EU’s official books).

The economics is clear: there is no need to be a member of the EU to thrive economically, and exiting does not have to impact UK economic growth at all. The UK can remain in the European Economic Area, as Norway has done, or simply agree on a trade deal, as Switzerland did, and enjoy free trade – the main intention of European agreements in the eyes of the public. The politics is also clear: the European superstate that has already been formed is not democratic. The so-called ‚European Parliament‘, unique among parliaments, cannot propose any legislation at all – laws are all formulated and proposed by the unelected European Commission! As a Russian observer has commented, the European Parliament is a rubber-stamping sham, just like the Soviet parliament during the days of the Soviet Union, while the unelected government is the European Commission – the Politibureau replete with its Commissars.

Big business and big banks, as well as central bankers and the IMF, constitute the financial elite that is behind this purposeful concentration of power – giving ever more power into the hands of ever fewer people. The undemocratic nature of EU institutions has reached such an extent that I have heard a recently retired member of the ECB governing council in private confessing that his biggest worry is the undemocratic nature and extent of the ECB’s powers, which have increasingly been abused for political ends. These facts have been drowned out by the constant drip of propaganda emanating from the powerful elites behind the creation of the United States of Europe.

During these years and decades of steady transfers of powers and sovereignty from nation states and their democratically elected assemblies to the unelected Brussels bureaucracy, I had always been puzzled by the apparent strong US support for all this. Whenever the ‚process‘ of ‚ever closer union‘ seemed to have hit an obstacle, a US president – no matter the post holder’s name or party affiliation – would intervene and in no uncertain terms tell the troublesome Europeans to get their act together and speed up unification of Europe into one state. In the naivety of my youth this had struck me as surprising. Likewise, the British public has recently been told by US president Obama that dropping out of the EU was not a good idea and they had better vote to stay in.

While it is not surprising that the global elite that has benefitted from the trend towards concentration of power is getting increasingly hysterical in their attempts to cajole the British public into voting to stay inside the EU, it is less clear why the US president and his government should be so keen on the EU project. We had been told in the past by the European media that the concentration of economic and political decision-making in Europe was being engineered in order to create a counter-weight against the US dominance. This seemed to motivate some pro-EU voices. Surely the US president must have heard about that?

There is another mystery. Only yesterday, an impressive-looking leaflet was dropped into the letterbox of my Winchester home, entitled „EU Basics – Your Guide to the Referendum“. It was issued by an organisation called the „European Movement“. The 16-page colour and high gloss booklet argues for Britain to stay in the EU. Who is this „European Movement“, and who is funding it? This little-known organisation seems financially powerful enough to drop a high-quality print booklet into every household in the entire UK.

The declassification of formerly secret records has solved both mysteries. For as it turns out, they are connected. In the words of Nottingham University academic Richard Aldrich:

„The use of covert operations for the specific promotion of European unity has attracted little scholarly attention and remains poorly understood. … the discreet injection of over three million dollars between 1949 and 1960, mostly from US government sources, was central to efforts to drum up mass support for the Schuman Plan, the European Defence Community and a European Assembly with sovereign powers. This covert contribution never formed less than half the European Movement’s budget and, after 1952, probably two-thirds. Simultaneously they sought to undermine the staunch resistance of the British Labour government to federalist ideas…. It is also particularly striking that the same small band of senior officials, many of them from the Western [note: this means US] intelligence community, were central in supporting the three most important transnational elite groups emerging in the 1950s: the European Movement, the Bilderberg Group and Jean Monnet’s Action Committee for a United States of Europe [ACUE]. Finally, at a time when some British antifederalists saw a continued ’special relationship‘ with the United States as an alternative to (perhaps even a refuge from) European federalism, it is ironic that some European federalist initiatives should have been sustained with American support.“

There is much more to read in this explosive piece of scholarly research (Richard J. Aldrich (1997), OSS, CIA and European unity: The American committee on United Europe, 1948-60, Diplomacy & Statecraft,8(1), pp. 184-227, online at

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09592299708406035#.V2exrU36voo )

UK journalist and former Brussels correspondent Ambrose Evans-Pritchard was the only journalist to report on such academic research findings, in two articles in 2000 and 2007:

„DECLASSIFIED American government documents show that the US intelligence community ran a campaign in the Fifties and Sixties to build momentum for a united Europe. … US intelligence secretly funded the European Movement, paying over half its budget. Some of Europe’s founding fathers were on the US payroll….

„The documents confirm suspicions voiced at the time that America was working aggressively behind the scenes to push Britain into a European state. Lest we forget, the French had to be dragged kicking and screaming to the federalist signing table in the early 1950s. Eisenhower threatened to cut off Marshall aid unless Paris agreed to kiss and make up with Berlin. France’s Jean Monnet, the EU’s mastermind, was viewed as an American agent – as indeed, he was. Monnet served as Roosevelt’s fixer in Europe during the war and orchestrated the failed US effort to stop de Gaulle taking power.

„One memorandum, dated July 26, 1950, gives instructions for a campaign to promote a fully fledged European parliament. It is signed by Gen William J Donovan, head of the American wartime Office of Strategic Services, precursor of the CIA. … Washington’s main tool for shaping the European agenda was the American Committee for a United Europe, created in 1948. The chairman was Donovan, ostensibly a private lawyer by then. The vice-chairman was Allen Dulles, the CIA director in the Fifties. The board included Walter Bedell Smith, the CIA’s first director, and a roster of ex-OSS figures and officials who moved in and out of the CIA. The documents show that ACUE financed the European Movement, the most important federalist organisation in the post-war years. In 1958, for example, it provided 53.5 per cent of the movement’s funds. The European Youth Campaign, an arm of the European Movement, was wholly funded and controlled by Washington.

„The leaders of the European Movement – Retinger, the visionary Robert Schuman and the former Belgian prime minister Paul-Henri Spaak – were all treated as hired hands by their American sponsors. The US role was handled as a covert operation. ACUE’s funding came from the Ford and Rockefeller foundations as well as business groups with close ties to the US government.

„The head of the Ford Foundation, ex-OSS officer Paul Hoffman, doubled as head of ACUE in the late Fifties. The State Department also played a role. A memo from the European section, dated June 11, 1965, advises the vice-president of the European Economic Community, Robert Marjolin, to pursue monetary union by stealth.

„It recommends suppressing debate until the point at which „adoption of such proposals would become virtually inescapable“.

„Fifty years after the Treaty of Rome, the architects of post-war US policy would be quite pleased, I think, if they were alive today. …

(excerpted from: Ambrose Evans-Pritchard (2000), Euro-federalists financed by US spy chiefs, The Daily Telegraph, 19 September 2000;

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/1356047/Euro-federalists-financed-by-US-spy-chiefs.html

and Ambrose Evans-Pritchard (2007), The scare of a superstate has passed, but do we want to lose the EU altogether? The Daily Telegraph, 7 April 2007)

No wonder Mr Evans-Pritchard has now concluded that he will vote for Brexit:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/06/12/brexit-vote-is-about-the-supremacy-of-parliament-and-nothing-els/

The revelation that the EU is the result of a major US secret service operation – effectively just yet another secret creature of deception launched by the CIA (taking seat of honour in the hall of infamy that includes false flag operations, invasions, coup-detats, and the establishment of organisations such as Al Qaida and ISIS) solves the third mystery, namely how on earth the allegedly democratic European nations could design such an undemocratic, virtually dictatorial structure. With the EU/United States of Europe the US not only achieves its geo-strategic goals in Europe, but it has also eliminated the role of pesky national parliaments that could on occasion get in the way of US or CIA foreign policy. And another puzzle is solved, namely why the EU had so readily agreed to a US request a few years back that US spy agencies get access to all European emails and telephone calls….

A vote to stay in the EU thus is a vote to abolish the United Kingdom as a sovereign state and merge it into the undemocratic United States of Europe which the European elites are building under US tutelage. That the European public – and, it seems, even European politicians – have little or no input in key European decisions can be seen from the increasingly aggressive NATO stance against Russia (Brussels-based NATO being the military arm of the EU, which is overtly under direct US control), and the one-sided sanctions against Russia that the US could simply order the Europeans to implement (causing significant losses in incomes and jobs in Europe, while boosting US business interests). Immigration policies are another case in point. If the US had in the past considered the largely homogeneous European populations a source of potential European resistance against its plans for Europe, then the policy to replace them with balkanised failed ‚melting pots‘ also makes sense.

Norway voted in 1995 on EU membership. Leading parties were all in favour. Big business and central banks, major media outlets and the talking heads on TV were frantically bullying and cajoling the Norwegian public to vote ‚in‘. The people remained steadfast and voted ‚out‘. Norway did splendidly. And so much more will the UK.
avatar
lizardking

Posts : 1781
Points : 5075
Reputation : 2557
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 23
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: White Genocide

Post by lizardking on Fri Jun 24, 2016 11:19 pm

BBC Bias, Brexit, the EU, Bilderberg and Global Government

http://www.globalresearch.ca/bbc-bias-brexit-the-eu-bilderberg-and-global-government/5518878


One of the BBC’s flagship news programmes has shown a “strong” bias towards Britain staying in the European Union (EU), a media monitoring group claimed last week. From the 13th of January to the 11th of March 2016, News-watch analysed 40 editions of the popular current affairs programme Newsnight. News-watchnoted that 25 of the guests who appeared on the programme were in favour of Britain staying in the EU, compared to only 14 who advocated the UK leaving the union. The monitoring group noted that: “The former President of the EU Commission, José Manuel Barroso, and the former Swedish Prime Minister, Carl Bildt, have had the clear opportunity in main interviews to explain why leaving the EU would not be in the UK’s interest. There has been no balancing opinion from similarly weighty figures” who support Britain leaving the EU. 
The BBC has always been the propaganda mouthpiece of the British establishment, yet many Britons still cling to the deluded notion that the BBC is an impartial news organisation. It is clear that the British establishment is desperate to keep Britain in the union, and this is reflected in the BBC’s reporting of the issue. A Brexit may prove to be the catalyst which encourages other countries to leave, triggering the collapse of the EU entirely. Unless the Western elite manage to roll a collapsed EU into a more globally integrated system, this would be a disaster for the globalists. If European nations regain control over their own affairs and resort back to national sovereignty, the agenda of the shadow elite in the form of destroying nation-states and building a global empire will be severely impeded.  
The debate on whether Britain should leave or stay in the EU has been gathering pace in the UK for years, and the Prime Minister has finally set June 23rd as the date for the referendum. David Cameron is merely trying to appease some factions in Britain who are pro-national sovereignty and feel that too much power is concentrated in the bureaucratic, technocratic and largely undemocratic hands of the EU. One the most pivotal speeches that Cameron has made on the EU in recent months, was not given at the House of Commons, but at the shadow British government: the Royal Institute of International Affairs (or Chatham House). The executive body of the EU – the European Commission – is a corporate partner of Chatham House. The majority of the major political figures in the West support Britain staying in the EU, including Barack Obama, Tony Blair and Peter Mandelson. This is because the EU is far more than just a union in Europe; it’s a stepping stone towards global government.
The EU and Global Government
The EU has always been a key part of the grander strategy by the global elite to destroy national sovereignty and bring in a world government, through eventually amalgamating the EU with other trading blocs. As Alan Sked, a Professor of International History at the London School of Economics and the original founder of UKIP (who has since criticised the party), notes, the EU was created by a Western elite who have been surreptitiously working to build a global government. Herman Van Rompuy, the former President of the European Council, even boldly proclaimed that 2009 was “the first year of global governance” (according to the translation). Van Rompuy added that “the climate conference in Copenhagen is another step towards the global management of our planet.”
The former President of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso, gave a speech in 2014 at the Yale School of Management, titled: ‘The European Union in the New World Order.’ Barroso said that the world is largely in a state of chaos, but “out of all this chaos some kind of order will eventually materialise.” He added that a gap is emerging “within the global sphere between an increasingly interdependent and interconnected world which lacks the global governance mechanisms to manage that interdependence and interconnectedness.” In essence, Barroso deceptively argued that the world is in such a state of chaos (the majority of which is created by the Western elite) that we are in desperate need of greater “global governance mechanisms” (i.e. order) – stronger global governance is practically synonymous with global government, but at bare minimum it’s the final stepping stone towards fully certified global government.
Peter Mandelson, a former European Commissioner for Trade and British politician, said during a [url=https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/files/chathamhouse/public/Meetings/Meeting Transcripts/220307mandelson.pdf]meeting at Chatham House[/url] in 2007 that he “sees the EU as Europe’s most promising means of engaging with and shaping globalization.” George Soros, the investor, billionaire and regime change extraordinaire, called the EU an “experiment in international governance.” Soros did state that the EU had “failed,” and that the surge in populism was threatening the union. But if the EU does completely disintegrate, the major danger is that the elite will push for further global integration as the solution.
Bilderberg and the EU
Founded in 1954, the Bilderberg group is illustrative of a shadowy network of super-elites who often make decisions in secret meetings that come to impact the lives of millions. The annual conference is attended by between 120 and 150 elites who meet to discuss global issues with a focus on North American and European challenges. It encompasses a range of individuals: from the heads of multi-national corporations to the leaders of nations; banking executives to media titans.
In 2009, WikiLeaks released a document which was reportedly the meeting report from the 1955 Bilderberg conference in West Germany. The document shows that the idea of creating the Euro was being discussed within circles of the Western elite as far back as 1955, concealed from the general public of Europe:
 “A European speaker expressed concern about the need to achieve a common currency, and indicated that in his view this necessarily implied the creation of a central political authority.”
Interestingly, one general point of agreement in the conference was the shared notion that atomic energy could be the most pivotal issue that would increase cooperation:
“Throughout the discussion there was considerable emphasis on atomic energy as forming, perhaps, the most hopeful area in which integration could proceed.”
Three years later, the European Atomic Energy Community was established in 1958. Another conclusion of the meeting was that the European project was designed to eviscerate national sovereignty and achieve the “highest degree of integration” as quickly as possible:
“It was generally recognized that it is our common responsibility to arrive in the shortest possible time at the highest degree of integration, beginning with a common European market.”
In more modern times, Étienne Davignon, a former European Commissioner and an influential architect of European integration, revealed that the Bilderberg group helped create the Euro in the 1990’s.
The Global Shift
In 2008, a book was published that is of critical importance in understanding some of the real forces that are driving the political and economic transitions in our world today. Written by David Rothkopf, a protégé of Henry Kissinger and an individual who belongs to numerous pre-eminent think tanks in the US (including the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)), it was titled, ‘Superclass: How the Rich Ruined Our World.’ Rothkopf argues that an infinitely small number of super-elites run the world, completely outside of any democratic process:
“A global elite has emerged over the past several decades that had vastly more power than any other group on the planet. Each of the members of this superclass has the ability to regularly influence the lives of millions of people in multiple countries worldwide… My researchers and I identified just over 6,000 people who qualify” (from the Preface).
Rothkopf continues, documenting the profound transition that has taken place in recent decades, from the nation-state towards a global state:
“But the center of gravity of elites has shifted. Today, the most powerful elites are global citizens tied more to international finance than national politics… If the richest and most powerful individuals in the world are now predominantly globally oriented, globally dependent, globally active, then an important shift has taken place in the world’s balance of power – away from national governments and away from national interests narrowly defined” (2009 edition: p.320).
This shift away from the nation-state and national governments towards a new global order is the defining one of our time. “We are living in a period of global change that is deeper, faster and broader than we have ever known,” was how Peter Mandelson [url=https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/files/chathamhouse/public/Meetings/Meeting Transcripts/220307mandelson.pdf]articulated it in 2007[/url]. But this shift is not a coincidental one; it has been the objective of a cabal of international bankers who have been pushing for the creation of a “world system” for over a century. As the late Carroll Quigley – a historian and Professor at Georgetown University – wrote in his 1966 book, Tragedy and Hope:
“The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations” (1998 printing: p.324).
The push towards a new world order is going to continue to meet resistance however, as the Westphalian model of international relations – based on the principles of national sovereignty and the non-interference in the affairs of other states – has been the central model since the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648. Furthermore, the fact that Russia is standing up for her national interests puts a significant spanner in the works of the Western elite.
avatar
lizardking

Posts : 1781
Points : 5075
Reputation : 2557
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 23
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: White Genocide

Post by lizardking on Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:24 pm

Europe’s “refugee” crisis and the Kalergi plan for white genocide
https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2015/11/12/europes-refugee-crisis-and-the-kalergi-plan-for-white-genocide/

In a recent op/ed titled “Can Europe Survive This Invasion?,” Patrick Buchanan writes:
With birth rates in this smallest and least populated of continents below replacement levels for decades, Europe is aging, shrinking and dying, as it is being invaded and altered forever. […]
Unlike America, Europe has never known mass immigration. And those pouring into Europe are Arab, African and Muslim, not European Christians or Jews. They come from other civilizations and cultures. And they are not all assimilating but rather creating enclaves in Europe that replicate the lands whence they came. […]
The threats raised by the mass migration into Europe rise to the level of the existential.
Can a civilization survive the replacement of the people who created it by people of other races, religions, and civilizations?
Ask the Native Americans.
Will Europe remain Europe if she is repopulated by Arabs, Muslims, Asians and Africans? What will hold Europe together? Free trade?
The current invasion of Europe by “refugees” from the Middle East, North Africa, and Asia is engineered and enabled by politicians (with the exception of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban), without the support of Europe’s peoples. That raises the obvious question: Why are European politicians promoting what Buchanan, Orban and any person (whose mind hasn’t been turned into mush by PC propaganda) so clearly see — the systematic destruction, via demographics, of European civilization and its people?
One explanation reaches back to the 1920s, to a plan drafted by a bi-racial Austrian-Japanese named Richard Nikolaus Eijiro, Count of Coudenhove-Kalergi (1894-1972), whose parents were the Austro-Hugarian diplomat Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of a Tokyo oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and landowner.
Richard Nikolaus, more commonly known as Coudenhove-Kalergi, was a Free Mason and an advocate of racial mixing. He is regarded as a father of the European Union, being the founder and president for 49 years until his death of the first movement for a united Europe, the Paneuropean Union.
In his 1925 book Praktischer Idealismus (Practical Idealism), Coudenhove-Kalergi wrote that “The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice.”
Though not himself a Jew according to Wikipedia, Kalergi extolled a kind of Jewish supremacism, characterizing Jews as “a spiritual nobility of Europe” — “a new race of nobility by the Grace of Spirit” formed just “when Europe’s feudal aristocracy became dilapidated,” in the crucible of antisemitism wherein “Instead of destroying European Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection process.”
As Europe finds itself overwhelmed by the incoming hordes of “refugees” and “migrants,” some have turned to what is called the Kalergi Plan to explain why Europe’s political elites encourage and welcome the invasion.
Below is an edited translation of an Italian-language article from the blog Identità.com, which is being reblogged and cited by various websites. The article, by Riccardo Percivaldi, is titled “The Kalergi Plan: the genocide of the European peoples“. I’m presenting this on FOTM without commentary, in the interest of information and to provoke discussion.
~Eowyn

The Kalergi Plan: the genocide of the European peoples

By Riccardo Percivaldi • Identità.com • Dec. 11, 2012 
Mass immigration is a phenomenon whose causes are still cleverly hidden by the system and which is falsely represented as inevitable by the multicultural propaganda. With this article we intend to demonstrate once and for all that mass immigration is not a spontaneous phenomenon. What appears to you as inevitable is actually the fruition of a decades-long plan to destroy completely the face of the Old Continent.

Pan Europa

Few people know that one of the main architects of European integration was also the one with a plan for the genocide of European peoples. He is a dark character whose existence is not known by the masses but whom the powerful consider as the founding father of the European Union. His name is Richard Coudenhove Kalergi. While he was alive, he moved behind the scenes, away from the spotlight, and managed to attract the most important heads of state in Europe, who became his supporters and promoters of European unification. In 1922, he founded the Pan Europa movement in Vienna. Its goal is to bring about a New World Order based on a federation of nations led by the United States. The unification of Europe would be the first step towards a single world government.
With the rise of fascism in Europe, the plan suffered a setback, resulting in the dissolution of the Pan-European union is forced to dissolve. After the Second World War, Kalergi redoubled his efforts and, aided by the support of Winston Churchill, the Masonic B’nai B’rith lodge, and major newspapers such as the New York Times, Kalergi succeeded in pushing his plan to the US government.

The Kalergi Plan

In his book Praktischer Idealismus (Practical Idealism), Kalergi declared that the people of the future “United States of Europe” will not be the original peoples of the Old Continent, but a kind of bestial subhumans made ​​by miscegenation. Kalergi stated in no uncertain terms that you must cross the peoples of Europe with Asian races and color, to create a multiethnic flock without quality and easily controllable by the ruling.
“The man of the future will be of mixed blood. The future Eurasian-Negroid race, very similar to the ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples, with a variety of personalities.”
Austrian writer Gerd Honsik describes the essence of the Kalergi plan:
Kalergi proclaims the abolition of the right of self-determination and, subsequently, the elimination of nations by means of ethnic separatist movements or mass allogeneic (genetically dissimilar) immigration. In order for Europe to be mastered by the elite, homogeneous peoples are transformed into a mixed race of whites, blacks and Asians. Kalergi characterized these mestizos as cruel and unfaithful, and maintained that the elite must deliberately create the mestizos to achieve their own superiority.
The elite will first eliminate democracy — the rule of the people. Next, the elite will eliminate the people via miscegenation, thereby replacing the white race with an easily controllable mestizo race. By abolishing the principle of equality of all before the law, avoiding and punishing any criticism of minorities, and protecting the minorities with special laws, the masses are suppressed.
In his time, politicians hearkened to Kalergi — banks and the press were based on his ideas, while U.S. intelligence financed his projects. Europe’s political leaders know that Kalergi was the author of the European Union. Though unknown to the public and untaught in schools, Kalergi is the father of Maastricht and multiculturalism, which indoctrinate Europeans to tolerate and accept subhuman migrants.
Although no school book talks of Kalergi, his ideas were the guiding principles of today’s European Union. His belief that the peoples of Europe should be mixed with blacks and Asians to destroy European identity and create a single mestizo race, is the basis of our present policy of protecting and integrating minorities. Disguised as humanitarianism, this policy is aimed at the greatest genocide [of whites] in history.
Europe’s Coudenhove-Kalergi prize was created in his honor. Every two years, Europeans who excelled in pursuing Kalergi’s criminal plan are awarded the prize, among whom are the likes of [German Chancellor] Angela Merkel and Herman Van Rompuy [former Prime Minister of Belgium and the first President of the European Council].
[White] genocide is also the basis of the UN’s welcoming policy toward millions of immigrants to compensate for Europe’s low birth rate. According to a UN report released in January 2000, entitled “Replacement Migration: a solution to declining and aging populations,” Europe would need 159 million immigrants by the year 2025. One wonders how it was possible to make such an accurate estimate if immigration was not a well-rehearsed plan. Certainly, Europe’s low birth rate can easily be reversed with appropriate measures to support families. It is equally clear that the genetic heritage of Europe cannot be protected by introducing nonEuropean migrants. On the contrary, mass immigration will only accelerate the disappearance of Europeans. The sole purpose of mass immigration, therefore, is to completely denature a people, turning them into a collection of individuals without any ethnic, historical and cultural cohesion. In short, the Kalergi Plan has been and still is the foundation of the official mass immigration policies of European governments, at the cost of the genocide of the peoples of Europe.
As G. Brock Chisholm, former director of the World Health Organization (WHO) and a good disciple of Kalergi, said [in 1955]:
“In all places, people must practice the limitation of births and racially mixed marriages so as to create a single race in a new world dependent on a central authority.”
CONCLUSION
If we look around Europe, we can see that the Kalergi Plan seems to be fully realized. We are facing a “terzomondializzazione” or Third Worldization of Europe — a “New Civilization” supported by multicultural missionaries, formed from forced mass immigration of hordes of Africans and Asians. Each year, miscegenation and mixed marriages produce thousands of new individuals of mixed race — the “sons of Kalergi”. Under the media’s dual pressure of misinformation and the propaganda of humanitarianism, Europeans are taught to deny their origins, to deny their ethnic identity.
Advocates of Globalization strive to convince us to give up our identity as a progressive and humanitarian act and to think that holding onto our ethnic and cultural identity is “racism” because they want to make us all into blind consumers. In these times, it is more necessary than ever that we expose the lies of the system so as to rekindle the spirit of rebellion in Europe. Integration is tantamount to genocide. We have no choice but to rebel for the alternative is ethnic suicide.
avatar
lizardking

Posts : 1781
Points : 5075
Reputation : 2557
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 23
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: White Genocide

Post by Animal Sanctuary on Tue Oct 04, 2016 7:39 pm

5 minutes before midnight...

avatar
Animal Sanctuary

Posts : 55
Points : 869
Reputation : 165
Join date : 2016-01-12

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Psi-Op

Post by conairscience on Sun May 07, 2017 4:48 am

Flat Earth brethren,

Please keep in mind that anything put out to divide us all is a Psi-Op. As a non-white I do understand that they Jews are trying to rid the world of all of you. I stand with you in defeating these people once and for all as they have created idiots of my people as well. If i can do anything to stop them from doing to the white race what they did to the black I will do everything in my power to do such. We don't need two races of controlled idiots.

conairscience

Posts : 1
Points : 171
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2017-05-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: White Genocide

Post by Admin on Sat May 20, 2017 3:32 pm

avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 765
Points : 3769
Reputation : 2177
Join date : 2015-12-30

View user profile http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com

Back to top Go down

Re: White Genocide

Post by Realearth on Sat May 27, 2017 2:26 am


Let’s Get This Right: Jews Aren’t White!
May 22, 2017 renegade

Renegade Editor’s Note: Hey Jared Taylor, how are you with the jews?



By Eric Thomson (2002)

From time to time a correspondent or writer will blithely state his unresearched opinion that jews are “White”. This is not only a fallacy, but it is an impossibility. Here’s why: the jews are the only people who are not qualified for protection under their own Genocide Treaty.

(1) They are not a race. This is proven from jewish sources in regard to Falashim or Black jews; Benai Israel or Indian jews; Chinese jews, who look Chinese to a foreigner, but who are not real Chinese; the Sephardim or semitic jews; and the Ashkenazim or “Russian” jews, who are most likely to have White genes. These people converted to Judaism in 700 A.D. Many of them resemble White people, but all of them, according to “The Genetics of the Jews” have Afro-Asian genes, including the blondest of them. Blond, blue-eyed people with Afro-Asian genes are not White, but mongrels.

(2) Jews are not a religious group, for they include atheists. Two thirds of the “jewish” population of Israel are not religious, but claim to be “jewish” through their mothers, which is how Orthodox rabbis define “jewishness”. A White person who ‘converts’ to Judaism will not be deemed a jew by Orthodox rabbis.

(3) Jews are not an ethnic group because they reside in all parts of the world and resemble their host peoples in looks, language, and often, in religion. Yet, they consider themselves jews. What can be their common bond? Not religion, not race, not ethnicity, but economy! It’s their rackets which bind them together as jews, exactly as the “patels” are bound together by their caste-determined role as merchants. Such disparate groups maintain cohesion with their common interests, and behave like a nation among nations. Yet, they are not a nation, which is comprised of people with a common genetic origin.

It is extremely dangerous to admit jews into White Nationalist groups, for I have had firsthand experience of their sudden betrayal of White interests in Rhodesia and South Africa. One day they were “White”. Next day they were sneering at us as “you White people”. Jews officially declared themselves non-White in 1972, as quoted in The Rand Daily Mail of May 15, 1972.

Some Goyim go by FEDZOGUSA’s definition of jews as “White”, but if we were to accept ZOG definitions of “White”, which includes hispanic mestizos and other Eurasian mongrels, Arabs, et al., we would cease being White Nationalists in fact and in effect. Foolish Whites may over-look racial differences, out of love for the ZOG, but mestizos, Arabs and other mongrels do not see Whites as their people, although they enjoy White women as trophy sex partners, like any Black or Asian pimp. I notice that a non-White ‘stud’ with a beautiful White female will enter premises, with his eye on the Ostensible White males, to amuse himself at their reactions, as if to say, “See what I took from you honkey muthas!” When an Ostensible White enters with a Black female, all eyes look at him with the unspoken question: “Are you blind or nuts?” I have seen this pattern almost daily in my work for a full decade, and there are many such places in this town, where the same things occur.

The jew’s job is to infiltrate all Gentile groups, in order to spy on and to influence them for the benefit of himself and his fellow jews. A genuinely righteous jew belongs not with us, but with his own people., who sorely need him. Exclude the jew, White man, or your castles will be built on quicksand, and they will collapse like Rhodesia and South Africa. You are now informed and you have thereby been warned. ORION! [Our Race Is Our Nation]

***

“THE GENETICS OF THE JEWS” by A.E. Mourant et al., Oxford University Press, 1978, reports the findings of jew hematologists, whose work was originally published in The Lancet, the official journal of the British Medical Association. They report that “even the blondest jew has Negro marker genes… which are due to concubinage (prostitution) and slavery.”

Blacks were introduced in the Black Sea region, and along the Silk Route, as ‘trade goods’. I have met dozens of ‘poison dwarfs’ from Odessa, jews who have mottled dark complexions, negroid noses, mongoloid eyes and kinky Afro hair; everyone as mean as he is ugly. These specimens comprise the darker side of the Ashkenazim or “Russian” jews. White they are not!



I'm Not White, I'm Jewish

Published on Mar 29, 2017
I suspect that the more whites from European descent become minorities in Western countries, the more Jews will stop pretending that they are "white." After all, what will be the need for it? Also, this is further evidence on how even young children are indoctrinated with Jewish nationalism/supremacism. Of course, if they were "white" there would be cries of "racism!" This doesn't apply to the Tribe however.

See also: After Inciting a Race War Against Whites, Jews Are Now Giving Up Their “Whiteness”
avatar
Realearth

Posts : 80
Points : 447
Reputation : 97
Join date : 2017-01-25

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: White Genocide

Post by BrandBrandon on Fri Jul 28, 2017 4:42 pm

...


Last edited by BrandBrandon on Sat Jul 29, 2017 6:07 am; edited 1 time in total

BrandBrandon

Posts : 4
Points : 90
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2017-07-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: White Genocide

Post by Birdog770 on Sat Jul 29, 2017 4:16 am

BrandBrandon,
That's a little extreme, don't you think. I recommend you watch some of the conscience videos on here. Then come back to me about "white only" "paradise". What are colors?
Every human is being genocided in one way or another. That's why the truth about the earth is so important. Realizing that the earth is flat and non moving will open up so many other questions to other deceptions.
Obviously, we all know people of all shades of skin color and some people are amazing and some people suck.
We don't need to be separated. We just to do remove the influence (and in some cases forced influence), from these low life's scum.
We don't need to be forced. If we allowed a free market and leave collectivism ideals alone, things would work out naturally. I see a lot of potential in this department. But I digress.
I find that most people I randomly interact with are nice people.
You speak from a place of fear and not love.
Peace brother. We're all in this experience together.

Birdog770

Posts : 23
Points : 210
Reputation : 15
Join date : 2017-05-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: White Genocide

Post by BrandBrandon on Sat Jul 29, 2017 6:14 am

I apologize for my indecent ramblings on this forum yesterday. Birdog770, you are right. My words do come from fear, (I was anxious). But I do not mean to disgrace the people of any race. The problem actually arises since we have never seen this enemy who lies to us in plain sight, who pulls the strings behind the curtains; people like me without knowing, point fingers.I understand that all kinds(having all kinds of nature, personalities) people can be found in all the ethnicities,races,or other groups.
Peace.

BrandBrandon

Posts : 4
Points : 90
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2017-07-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: White Genocide

Post by Birdog770 on Sat Jul 29, 2017 8:09 am

BrandBrandon,
No worries dude. Don't even let me lie to you. I don't have it all figured out. I do know that we're told in the US that everyone wants to cut our heads off. But from my experience, my travels, the people are either happy to meet an American or indifferent. It's kind of narcissistic to think everyone hates you.
I mean, there is obviously an orchestrated mass migration being done by an evil force to change demographics for devious reasons. Like a board game. They do it with a low profile in the states and it's wide open in the EU. With little regard for either group. It's lunacy and no amount of logic will change the puppet masters direction.
I guess the only way is to remove their power.

Birdog770

Posts : 23
Points : 210
Reputation : 15
Join date : 2017-05-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: White Genocide

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum