Questions About the Flat Earth

Page 4 of 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

Go down

Just wondering

Post by Justin McCarron on Sat Apr 29, 2017 4:21 pm

I believe the place we live on is flat makes perfect sense. I just have a couple questions. Are volcanoes real? what is lava ? are the tectonic plates under the earth moving ? and if not then what are earthquakes?

Justin McCarron

Posts : 1
Points : 389
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2017-04-29

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Questions About the Flat Earth

Post by Mar L on Wed May 24, 2017 7:35 am

I have a few things I always wondered about but can't seem to find enough information  on (or rather, REAL information on) so if anyone knows anything or could point me in the direction of some reading material /videos that would be amazing.
1.) The Dark Rift: what it really is,  its connection to flat earth and ancient cosmology (I've watched wayki wayki 's video but I've now unsubscribed. )
2.) Saturn, the cube and all related symbolism: what does it really mean and what is its connection to everything they try to hide from us?
3.) The fact the dark ages never really existed and were another historical fabrication to cover up what really happened and make history longer than it actually is.
4.) The galapagos : since evolution is a total pile of s*** what is the real truth about their existence?  And what is going on underground there? It's almost impossible to find true info.
5.) The northern lights  (aurora borealis) : the truth. What are they really  and what is their connection to our flat earth and the "North pole"? I know they're something amazing and somehow connect everything  and I've always been drawn to them even before I woke up to flat earth.

I know it's not all flat earth questions directly but I'm convinced EVERYTHING is connected.

Thank you

Mar L

Posts : 24
Points : 517
Reputation : 24
Join date : 2017-02-11

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Questions About the Flat Earth

Post by Foreverlearning on Wed May 24, 2017 6:11 pm

[quote="Mar L"
3.) The fact the dark ages never really existed and were another historical fabrication to cover up what really happened and make history longer than it actually is.

Hi Mar L I have been watching a YouTube channel "NewEarth" and she mentions some very compelling information about our time lines and survivors of Atlantis.
It is most definitely food for thought.
avatar
Foreverlearning

Posts : 62
Points : 995
Reputation : 75
Join date : 2016-01-15
Age : 45
Location : Ontario, Canada

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Questions About the Flat Earth

Post by Mar L on Wed May 24, 2017 9:01 pm

Thanks I'll check it out, definitely!

Mar L

Posts : 24
Points : 517
Reputation : 24
Join date : 2017-02-11

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Population growth is impossible to account for if Earth is old.

Post by damnice on Thu May 25, 2017 9:10 am

Foreverlearning wrote:
Hi Mar L I have been watching a YouTube channel "NewEarth" and she mentions some very compelling information about our time lines and survivors of Atlantis.
It is most definitely food for thought.

I'm a huge fan of simple logical concepts and proofs. If human growth was a steady and VERY conservative 1% per year, starting with only 2 people 4000 years ago, we'd have 38,000 trillion people alive today. They are lying to us about many things, population could very well be one of them. The age of Earth is definitely falsified in the science community. They tell us the population growth % has been slowing which makes the proposed timeline seem even more far fetched.

http://www.metamorphosisalpha.com/ias/population.php
avatar
damnice

Posts : 40
Points : 1031
Reputation : 113
Join date : 2016-01-01
Age : 37
Location : SLC, UT

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Santiago de Chile to Sydney

Post by eazierider on Tue May 30, 2017 12:37 pm

Hello everyone,

the one ball argument I have trouble debunking is the direct flight between Santiago de Chile and Sydney.

They claim this distance wouldn't be impossible to cover with a direct flight on the AE map, which the ballers claim is "our" map.

My best explanation is that the AE map is not the actual flat earth map. But you can see how it's a weak point, because all I can say is, "we don't know" at this point.

Don't get me wrong, I am perfectly happy with stating that we don't fully understand the entire layout of this planet yet given centuries of misinformation and indoctrination. I was just wondering whether someone had any more information on this particular problem?

Thanks and kind regards,

e

eazierider

Posts : 4
Points : 376
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2017-05-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Questions About the Flat Earth

Post by Schpankme on Tue May 30, 2017 12:53 pm

eazierider wrote:
the one ball argument
I have trouble debunking
is the direct flight between Santiago de Chile and Sydney

You have trouble debunking Spinning Balls that hold water around their circumference?
You have trouble debunking Curvature for Perspective?

If your sitting on the Baller Fence, let me suggest you read more and ask less question on this flat Earth Forum.

We have covered these auto generated flights in the TOPIC: Flight Routes, Shipping Routes, Under Sea Cables

These fights are auto generated based on someone implementing two locations. Let me advise you that Qantas does not fly out of the International Terminal Santiago.

There are no nonstop flights from Santiago de Chile and Sydney
There are no shipping lanes from Santiago de Chile and Sydney
There are no under sea cables from Santiago de Chile and Sydney

If you have further details related to these flights, please make sure to provide PROOF OF PURCHASE within the Topic provided.

avatar
Schpankme

Posts : 729
Points : 2946
Reputation : 1320
Join date : 2015-12-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Questions About the Flat Earth

Post by eazierider on Tue May 30, 2017 1:24 pm

Thanks for the quick reply.

eazierider

Posts : 4
Points : 376
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2017-05-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Questions About the Flat Earth

Post by Schpankme on Tue May 30, 2017 1:25 pm

eazierider wrote:Thanks for the quick reply.

Welcome to IFERS.
avatar
Schpankme

Posts : 729
Points : 2946
Reputation : 1320
Join date : 2015-12-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Questions About the Flat Earth

Post by eazierider on Tue May 30, 2017 2:08 pm

And just to clarify: the reason I asked is that those flights are listed on Quantas own website.




Add this video – by a guy who I know is listed as a shill here – and it made me ask the question.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJpezryshsg

I by no means need further proof that we're not living on a spinning ball. I just wanted every argument I could come up with to be water tight. And I needed one for anybody who might show me this video.

I apologize for not having searched long enough to find the topic you linked to on my own.

eazierider

Posts : 4
Points : 376
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2017-05-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Amateur airplanes question

Post by Reddoctober on Sat Jul 15, 2017 9:08 pm




Model rc airplanes can fly at 440+ mph.

Do you think it could make it to "space" or whatever is above us?

An rc craft has even flown across the ocean.

They run on scale jet turbine engines.



An amateur rocket might be too expensive to make but one of these might be more affordable to explore the upper atmosphere with a camera.



Thoughts?

Reddoctober

Posts : 1
Points : 313
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2017-07-15

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Questions About the Flat Earth

Post by FL@T-E@RTH on Sun Jul 16, 2017 3:25 am

eazierider wrote:And just to clarify: the reason I asked is that those flights are listed on Quantas own website.

I guarantee if you actually pay for the ticket YOURSELF one of two things will happen.

1: You will be informed there are no seats available on the direct flight and offered a stop-over flight instead once your payment has been processed.
2: On the day you arrive at the airport for the direct flight you will be informed it has either, been cancelled, or the plane has a problem, and you will be transferred to an alternative non-direct flight with a stop-over.
avatar
FL@T-E@RTH

Posts : 214
Points : 1080
Reputation : 257
Join date : 2016-10-12
Age : 45
Location : Certainly Not On A Globe

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Questions About the Flat Earth

Post by Pearshapidness on Fri Nov 24, 2017 5:00 pm

Hello all, I was recently in a debate with a globulist in the comment section of youtube, the video was "testing flattards part 1" by coolhardlogic.  My comment started with a list of reasons why the earth was flat, about 4 days ago if you want to read it(my avatar is neil the ass Tysons face in a pear haha )  In the thread I go on to argue that the Cavendish effect is better explained by van der waals forces/electromagnetism than the mystical, mechanismless 'gravity'.  This is an excerpt from the debate that I wanted to bounce off Eric Dubay if possible, or anyone who can provide substance, to get the counter explanation for the question the character "jimsmithinchiapas" asked.  Here it is, this is him responding to me:

"@Pearshapidness  "It’s all reverse engineered" You're misrepresenting my question as well as evading it. I asked you, specifically, about *previously-undetected comets*, many of whose orbits are hyperbolic (and therefore cannot be periodic). If you had the slightest knowledge of the subject upon which you're expounding, you'd know that astronomers can, within days of first detecting such comets, predict the comets' perihelia accurately and routinely, even though the perihelia are months away.

The examples you've given in response refer, instead, to long-studied phenomena that are know to be periodic. Yes, those predictions can be "reverse-engineered"; many ancient peoples did so. But your examples are irrelevant to the case of previously-undetected comets. So, again: How can astronomers predict orbits of previously-undetected comets accurately, using orbital-mechanics calculations based upon gravity, if there is no such thing as gravity?

I admittedly don't know much about comets, meteor showers etc, especially since much of the information seems to come from heliocentrists and is therefore highly suspicious, but I would greatly value Mr. Dubay's or anyone else's input in giving an answer to this question.  I did do some research and read an article about NASA possibly faking the path of the comet NEAT but Id like to hear what you folks here at IFERS have to say in response to the globulists question.  Thanks, and happy thanksgiving!

Pearshapidness

Posts : 1
Points : 182
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2017-11-24

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Questions About the Flat Earth

Post by Admin on Fri Nov 24, 2017 5:11 pm

by starfox42 Today at 8:58

They can't. You can send people private messages if you'd like to ask direct questions, and there's a load of good information in this forum on the subject already, I suggest you look around a bit. Also, seems you're forgetting that the people you're arguing with suffer from cognitive dissonance and believe just as they can see the sun 93 million miles away that people are actually predicting orbits and using "orbital mechanics based on gravity." Ask one of them to show you a gravity measurer.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 1091
Points : 5041
Reputation : 2901
Join date : 2015-12-30

View user profile http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com

Back to top Go down

“Great American Solar Eclipse 2017”

Post by ForeverFlat on Wed Nov 29, 2017 2:57 am

Is anyone aware of any footage of the FP Pendulum, taken during the this years past solar eclipse? I was curious if anyone had come across, or personally documented Foucault’s parlor trick, during this solar event. I haven’t seen any yet. If anyone else has, please reach out, much love. ✌️
avatar
ForeverFlat

Posts : 19
Points : 280
Reputation : 25
Join date : 2017-10-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Questions About the Flat Earth

Post by FL@T-E@RTH on Wed Nov 29, 2017 5:48 am

Pearshapidness wrote:
How can astronomers predict orbits of previously-undetected comets accurately, using orbital-mechanics calculations based upon gravity, if there is no such thing as gravity?

Ask him to provide evidence of a previously undiscovered comet which astronomers have used orbital-mechanics and calculations to successfully predict it's return.
If he states Halleys Comet you'll know he is full of shit Smile

Halleys Comet was known about hundreds of years before Edmond Halley postulated it was a returning comet, which then gave his name to the comet. (It was first observed in 240 BC)
Incidentally it's last pass over the sky was in 1986 and the Challenger was due to observe it, and we all know what happened to the 1986 Challenger launch..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Challenger_disaster
avatar
FL@T-E@RTH

Posts : 214
Points : 1080
Reputation : 257
Join date : 2016-10-12
Age : 45
Location : Certainly Not On A Globe

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Questions About the Flat Earth

Post by Anej on Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:18 pm

Hi, I have to say that, being a researcher in a completely different scientific field, most of the major advances I have seen stemmed from a truly objective standpoint questioning and very often relaxing many a hypothesis that are at the core of the academic establishment and politically correct, often contradicting the basic building blocks of the general consensus.
Having looked at videos and read about the flat earth model, I found many ideas to be very elegant indeed.
I have one question though: I have been travelling very often on a Boeing 737-800 at 10,000 meters altitude at a cruising speed of 850 kilometres an hour over Spain, several times with a 5/5 visibility with no clouds and clear view of the ground.
Knowing the distances between the various cities as well as the main rivers and the general geography of the country, I would say that one can clearly see up to about 350 kilometers in all directions.
Assuming the flat earth model placing the sun at 5,000 kilometers altitude, if we imagine an observer to be at 5,000 kilometers altitude, one would expect to be able to see in all directions up to 5,000/10= 500 times further than me in the plane. That would mean that the sun should be creating an area of light on the ground with a radius of 500*350=175,000 kilometers.
The outer (Antarctica) ring of the flat earth model has a circonference of 84,000 kilometers, therefore a radius of 13,400 kilometers.
That would mean that the sun would be clearly visible from any point on earth at all times. Which is not the case.
Therefore the only way for the sun to be creating an area of light on the ground, when circling on the Tropic of Cancer, that does not light further than the central North Pole would be that the lit area has a radius of at most 6,700 kilometers, which would place the sun at an altitude 175/6.7=26 times lower than earlier assumed, that is 200 kilometers altitude.
But that would mean that the area lit stops at the equator and only the northern hemisphere is lit. Which is not the case.
That leads me to the question: what is the altitude of the sun and what is the radius of the lit area?
Many thanks in advance.

Anej

Posts : 1
Points : 165
Reputation : -1
Join date : 2017-12-08

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Questions About the Flat Earth

Post by FL@T-E@RTH on Fri Dec 08, 2017 7:11 pm

Anej wrote:Hi, I have to say that, being a researcher in a completely different scientific field, most of the major advances I have seen stemmed from a truly objective standpoint questioning and very often relaxing many a hypothesis that are at the core of the academic establishment and politically correct, often contradicting the basic building blocks of the general consensus.
Having looked at videos and read about the flat earth model, I found many ideas to be very elegant indeed.
I have one question though: I have been travelling very often on a Boeing 737-800 at 10,000 meters altitude at a cruising speed of 850 kilometres an hour over Spain, several times with a 5/5 visibility with no clouds and clear view of the ground.
Knowing the distances between the various cities as well as the main rivers and the general geography of the country, I would say that one can clearly see up to about 350 kilometers in all directions.
Assuming the flat earth model placing the sun at 5,000 kilometers altitude, if we imagine an observer to be at 5,000 kilometers altitude, one would expect to be able to see in all directions up to 5,000/10= 500 times further than me in the plane. That would mean that the sun should be creating an area of light on the ground with a radius of 500*350=175,000 kilometers.
The outer (Antarctica) ring of the flat earth model has a circonference of 84,000 kilometers, therefore a radius of 13,400 kilometers.
That would mean that the sun would be clearly visible from any point on earth at all times. Which is not the case.
Therefore the only way for the sun to be creating an area of light on the ground, when circling on the Tropic of Cancer, that does not light further than the central North Pole would be that the lit area has a radius of at most 6,700 kilometers, which would place the sun at an altitude 175/6.7=26 times lower than earlier assumed, that is 200 kilometers altitude.
But that would mean that the area lit stops at the equator and only the northern hemisphere is lit. Which is not the case.
That leads me to the question: what is the altitude of the sun and what is the radius of the lit area?
Many thanks in advance.

What a load of pseudo-intellectual garbage


I would say...

Assuming the Flat Earth model...

If we imagine...

One would expect...

That would mean...

For someone who claims to be from a scientific research standpoint, that's a lot of assumptions,
We deal with objective, provable and demonstrable, not assumptions, presumptions and theory.
avatar
FL@T-E@RTH

Posts : 214
Points : 1080
Reputation : 257
Join date : 2016-10-12
Age : 45
Location : Certainly Not On A Globe

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Questions About the Flat Earth

Post by Skywalker on Sat Dec 09, 2017 11:15 pm

Anej,

Like the rest of us, you don't know what the sun is, so don't assume to know any of its properties.
avatar
Skywalker

Posts : 99
Points : 941
Reputation : 110
Join date : 2016-05-20
Location : Scotland

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Interesting take on the Flat Earth magnetic pole swap.

Post by Tsaltsrif on Fri May 11, 2018 2:08 am

I've come across a channel on jewtube by the name of brianaustinlambert33. I'm wondering if any of you have seen or heard anything about it.

Here's a link to the first video in his series "100% Correct Working Model of Everything and The Coming Worlwide Catastrophe"
https://youtu.be/XezJPR7snAo

Now, I'm not saying that I buy into the end of the world schtick, but there seems to be some level of credence of what he's talking about. If you look up:
1. magnetostratification and the 'brunhes matuyama gauss gilbert' lines
2. Electrical Discharges carved the American Southwest https://youtu.be/ecDDczEogR0
3. Primer fields. https://youtu.be/9EPlyiW-xGI

If anything It's another fascinating subject. Terrifyingly fascinating.

What do you guys think? If you've done any of your own research And come across anything interesting let me know.

Tsaltsrif

Posts : 3
Points : 150
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2017-12-31

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Questions About the Flat Earth

Post by mitch on Fri May 11, 2018 4:02 pm

Christ psychotic fear porn
avatar
mitch

Posts : 130
Points : 1265
Reputation : 263
Join date : 2016-01-08
Location : Northumbria

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Questions About the Flat Earth

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 4 of 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum