No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Post by lizardking on Mon Jan 11, 2016 9:20 pm

Post by Admin on Mar 23, 2015 at 9:44am

The days in Antarctica are comparatively short to everywhere else on Earth, with swifter dawn and dusk periods also. From approximately May to July every year there is perpetual night and the Sun never makes it over the Antarctic horizon. They lie to us and claim Antarctica has a "midnight sun" like the Arctic, periods of many days/weeks of continuous sunlight as seen in the video above. You can find many such videos of the Arctic Midnight Sun online, but you'll only find this one following, clearly fake video of the "Antarctic Midnight Sun" full of cut scenes claiming "the Sun never sets in Antarctica" which is a total lie. The Sun is never seen directly over-head at the high-noon position in Antarctica at any time during the year. In fact it barely rises more than 20-30 degrees above the horizon daily and never stays above the horizon for anything close to 24+ hours as it does in Arctic regions:



The Midnight Sun, far from being something "debunkers" could use against the flat Earth model, confirms and proves in several ways the globular model is incorrect. If the Earth were actually a spinning globe revolving around the Sun, the only place such a phenomenon as the Midnight Sun could be observed would be at the poles. Any other vantage point from 89 degrees latitude downwards could never, regardless of any tilt or inclination, see the Sun for 24 hours straight. To see the Sun for an entire revolution on a spinning globe at a point other than the poles, you would have to be looking through miles and miles of land and sea for part of the revolution! Anyone below the 89th parallel could never witness the Sun for 72 hours, 3 whole revolutions, straight because to do so would be to assume you are somehow seeing “through the globe” and to the Sun on the other side! Since such an assumption is ridiculous, and yet the Midnight Sun can clearly be seen as low as the 65 parallel, this is another absolute proof that Earth is the flat, stationary center of the universe.



“If the earth be a globe, at midnight the eye would have to penetrate thousands of miles of land and water even at 65 degrees North latitude, in order to see the sun at midnight. That the sun can be seen for days together in the Far North during the Northern summer, proves that there is something very seriously wrong with the globular hypothesis. Besides this how is it that the midnight sun is never seen in the south during the southern summer? Cook penetrated as far South as 71 degrees, Weddell in 1893 reached as far as 74 degrees, and Sir James C. Ross in 1841 and 1842 reached the 78th parallel, but I am not aware that any of these navigators have left it on record that the sun was seen at midnight in the south.” -Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (63)

Heliocentrists also cannot explain why the Midnight Sun phenomenon is not experienced anywhere in the Southern hemisphere at any time of year. Quite to the contrary, it has been recorded by the Royal Belgian Geographical Society in “Expedition Antarctique Belge,” that during the most severe part of the Antarctic winter, from 71 degrees South latitude onwards, the sun sets on May 17th and is not seen above the horizon again until July 21st! This is completely at odds with the ball-Earth theory, but easily explained by the flat-Earth model. The Midnight Sun is seen from high altitudes in extreme Northern latitudes during Arctic summer because the Sun, at its inner-most cycle, is circling tightly enough around the polar center that it remains visible above the horizon for someone at such a vantage point. Likewise, in extreme Southern latitudes during Arctic summer, the Sun completely disappears from view for over 2 months because there at the Northern Tropic, at the inner-most arc of its boomerang journey, the Sun is circling the Northern center too tightly to be seen from the Southern circumference. 

“It is evident that in the great encircling oceans of the south, and the numerous islands and parts of continents, which exist beyond that part of the earth where the sun is vertical, cannot have their days and nights, seasons, etc., precisely like those in the northern region. The north is a centre, and the south is that centre radiated or thrown out to a vast oceanic circumference, terminating in circular walls of ice, which form an impenetrable frozen barrier. Hence the phenomena referred to as existing in the north must be considerably modified in the south, For instance, the north being central, the light of the sun advancing and receding, gives long periods of alternate light and darkness at the actual centre; but in the far south, the sun, even when moving in his outer path, can only throw its light to a certain distance, beyond which there must be perpetual darkness. No evidence exists of there being long periods of light and darkness regularly alternating, as in the north. In the north, in summer-time, when the sun is moving in its inner path, the light shines continually for months together over the central region, and rapidly develops numerous forms of animal and vegetable life.” -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (115)

In typical reverse-engineered damage-control fashion, trying to explain away the Midnight Sun, problematic Arctic/Antarctic phenomena, and the fact that Polaris can be seen approximately 23.5 degrees South of the equator, desperate heliocentrists in the late 19th century again modified their theory to say the ball-Earth actually tilts back 23.5 degrees on its vertical axis, thus explaining away many problems in one swoop! If it simply tilted the same direction constantly, however, this would still not explain the phenomena because after 6 months of supposed orbital motion around the Sun, any amount of tilt would be perfectly opposite, thus negating their alleged explanation for Arctic/Antarctic irregularities. To account for this, heliocentrists added that the Earth also “wobbles,” in a complex combination of patterns known as, “planetary nutation,” the “Chandler wobble,” and “axial precession” which, in their vivid imaginations, somehow explains away common sense.

Common sense, however, says that if the heat of the Sun travels 93,000,000 miles to reach us, a small axial tilt and wobble, the difference of a few thousand miles, should be completely negligible. If the ball-Earth actually spun around 93,000,000 miles from the Sun, regardless of any tilt or wobble, temperature and climate the whole world over should be almost completely uniform. If the heat of the Sun truly travelled ninety-three million miles to reach Earth’s equator, the extra few thousand miles to the poles, regardless of any supposed “tilt” or “wobble,” no matter how extreme, would surely be negligible in negating such intense heat!

“The supposition that the seasons are caused by the Earth’s annual motion round the Sun at a mean distance of 92,500,000 of miles, is grotesque. According to Piazzi the size of the Sun is in proportion to the Earth, as 329,360 to 1, the diameter exceeds that of the Earth 112 times. The Earth appears, as Biot says, by this statement, ‘a mere grain of sand, as compared to the Sun.’ This enormous expanse of light focused on a rotating ‘grain of sand,’ at the distance of 93 millions of miles, would cause the same season throughout it. The paltry few miles, in comparison that separates London from Cape Town could never cause diverse seasons, neither would the distance from London to the Riviera justify the difference in the climate that characterizes the two places.” -E. Eschini, “Foundations of Many Generations” (7)



Common sense also says if the Earth were actually a ball spinning daily with uniform speed around the Sun, there should be exactly 12 hour days and 12 hour nights everywhere all year round! The great variety in length of days and nights throughout the year all over Earth testifies to the fact that we do not live on a spinning ball-planet. There cannot exist phenomena such as this on a globe, nor the Midnight Sun, nor anything like Antarctic winter where the Sun is nowhere to be found for over 2 months per year!

“The theory of the rotation of the earth may once and for all be definitely disposed of as impracticable by pointing out the following inadvertence. It is said that the rotation takes twenty-four hours and that its speed is uniform, in which case, necessarily, days and nights should have an identical duration of twelve hours each all the year round. The sun should invariably rise in the morning and set in the evening at the same hours, with the result that it would be the equinox every day from the 1st of January to the 31st of December. One should stop and reflect on this before saying that the earth has a movement of rotation. How does the system of gravitation account for the seasonal variations in the lengths of days and nights if the earth rotates at a uniform speed in twenty-four hours!?” -Gabrielle Henriet, “Heaven and Earth” (10)
avatar
lizardking

Posts : 1757
Points : 4786
Reputation : 2504
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 23
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Post by lizardking on Mon Jan 11, 2016 9:20 pm

Post by Admin on Mar 28, 2015 at 4:35am

Welcome Earthisastarge, the supposed "axial tilt" they added to the ball-model was for this very reason. People can see Polaris all the way down to the Tropic of Capricorn at 23.5 degrees South latitude, which is completely impossible on a ball-Earth, so what did they do? They said, oh yeah, the ball is tilted back on its axis exactly 23.5 degrees and that's why you can see Polaris in the South. This brilliant reverse-engineered damage-control explanation still doesn't work though because it still cannot account for the visibility of many other constellations. For instance, Ursa Major, very close to Polaris, can be seen from 90 degrees North latitude (the North Pole) all the way down to 30 degrees South latitude. The constellation Vulpecula can be seen from 90 degrees North latitude, all the way to 55 degrees South latitude. Taurus, Pisces and Leo can be seen from 90 degrees North all the way to 65 degrees South. Aquarius and Libra can be seen from 65 degrees North to 90 degrees South! The constellation Virgo is visible from 80 degrees North down to 80 degrees South, and Orion can be seen from 85 degrees North all the way to 75 degrees South latitude! An observer on a ball-Earth, regardless of any tilt or inclination, should not logically be able to see this far.

“Another thing is certain, that from within the equator the north pole star, and the constellations Ursa Major, Ursa Minor, and many others, can be seen from every meridian simultaneously; whereas in the south, from the equator, neither the so-called south pole star, nor the remarkable constellation of the Southern Cross, can be seen simultaneously from every meridian, showing that all the constellations of the south - pole star included - sweep over a great southern arc and across the meridian, from their rise in the evening to their setting in the morning. But if the earth is a globe, Sigma Octantis, a south pole star, and the Southern Cross, a southern circumpolar constellation, they would all be visible at the same time from every longitude on the same latitude, as is the case with the northern pole star and the northern circumpolar constellations. Such, however, is not the case.” -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (286)

They also had to add a "wobble" to the "tilt" to try and make their make-shift "seasons" model work. Unfortunately for them, you can prove in your backyard the Earth does not wobble (or rotate around the Sun for that matter) by keeping track of the meridian lines/times of stars and seeing that they do not accordingly change throughout the year due to Earth's supposed wobbling and spinning around the Sun.

“Take two carefully-bored metallic tubes, not less than six feet in length, and place them one yard asunder, on the opposite sides of a wooden frame, or a solid block of wood or stone: so adjust them that their centres or axes of vision shall be perfectly parallel to each other. Now, direct them to the plane of some notable fixed star, a few seconds previous to its meridian time. Let an observer be stationed at each tube and the moment the star appears in the first tube let a loud knock or other signal be given, to be repeated by the observer at the second tube when he first sees the same star. A distinct period of time will elapse between the signals given. The signals will follow each other in very rapid succession, but still, the time between is sufficient to show that the same star is not visible at the same moment by two parallel lines of sight when only one yard asunder. A slight inclination of the second tube towards the first tube would be required for the star to be seen through both tubes at the same instant. Let the tubes remain in their position for six months; at the end of which time the same observation or experiment will produce the same results--the star will be visible at the same meridian time, without the slightest alteration being required in the direction of the tubes: from which it is concluded that if the earth had moved one single yard in an orbit through space, there would at least be observed the slight inclination of the tube which the difference in position of one yard had previously required. But as no such difference in the direction of the tube is required, the conclusion is unavoidable, that in six months a given meridian upon the earth's surface does not move a single yard, and therefore, that the earth has not the slightest degree of orbital motion." -Samuel Rowbotham, "Zetetic Astronomy"

Once people like Danish Astronomer Tycho Brahe pointed this out, then the heliocentric "globalists" moved the distance of the stars to trillions upon trillions of miles away claiming them to be sooo far away that even after 200 million miles of supposed orbit around the Sun, we still cannot see even an inch of parallax change! You've got to give them credit for constantly and continuously re-modeling their pile of bullshit, like a potter, with a huge hunk of steaming shit on his potter's wheel, just re-molding and working that shit until it don't stink too bad Razz (puke) Even with all their back-peddling damage-control, however, they cannot answer the myriad objections in the following film:

avatar
lizardking

Posts : 1757
Points : 4786
Reputation : 2504
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 23
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Post by lizardking on Mon Jan 11, 2016 9:21 pm

Post by schpankme on Apr 9, 2015 at 5:57pm

Apr 9, 2015 at 5:52pm erick said:
[From the South Pole] Follow the shadow of the flag poles.
It shows that the sun does not set in January at the south pole.
This should be impossible in a flat earth scenario.
There is no South Pole, therefore the video is fake.
avatar
lizardking

Posts : 1757
Points : 4786
Reputation : 2504
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 23
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Post by lizardking on Mon Jan 11, 2016 9:21 pm

Post by Admin on Apr 9, 2015 at 6:01pm

I have seen videos of the Sun in the extreme North where shadows behave just like this as the Sun goes around during the summer. All it takes to fake this footage is change the word "North" Pole to "South."
avatar
lizardking

Posts : 1757
Points : 4786
Reputation : 2504
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 23
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Post by lizardking on Mon Jan 11, 2016 9:21 pm

Post by thinkforyourself on Apr 9, 2015 at 6:35pm

Apr 9, 2015 at 5:52pm erick said:
www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/obop/spo/movies.html

click on January of 2013. Follow the shadow of the flag poles. It shows fairly clearly shows that the sun does not set in January at the south pole. This should be impossible in a flat earth scenario.
Ridiculous. Their own videos of the Antarctic during the time period where they claim that the sun never sets, clearly shows the sun setting.

Go and spread your crap and lies elsewhere.
avatar
lizardking

Posts : 1757
Points : 4786
Reputation : 2504
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 23
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Post by lizardking on Mon Jan 11, 2016 9:22 pm

Post by raymond on Apr 12, 2015 at 7:33am

Interestingly, there are no videos from May to August. Why is that? Too dark? Except they have one for June 2, 2004. "lunar pass and aurora's" That doesn't really look like moonlight to me, but what do I know? The light moves behind the camera, but I have no way verify either the time or location of the video.

I find the 'midnight sun' video to be laughable. Clearly this MrTwinning is confused about where he is. It sure looks warm there for 'antarctica.' Maybe he is anticipating the poles 'switching?' Very Happy

I found another 'south pole' midnight sun type video at newt.phys.unsw.edu.au/southpolediaries/webcam.html

"How was the animation made?

The web camera was set up to take an image of the AASTO every four minutes for a period of 33 hours (and the sun just goes round and round, proving we're at the South Pole). This produced a series of over 1000 jpeg images. These images were combined in Adobe Premiere and made into animation which was then compressed to MPEG format ready for the web."

33 hours, huh? I wonder why they chose that number. Anyway, clearly this 'proves' something - mostly their inability to do simple math. How'd they get over 1000 images in 33 hours by taking ~15/hr? Did 'over 1000' just sound more believable?

Ray
avatar
lizardking

Posts : 1757
Points : 4786
Reputation : 2504
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 23
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Post by lizardking on Mon Jan 11, 2016 9:22 pm

Post by schpankme on Apr 12, 2015 at 7:44am

Apr 12, 2015 at 7:33am raymond said:
The web camera was set up to take an image of the AASTO
every four minutes
for a period of 33 hours
This produced a series of over 1000 jpeg images
How'd they get over 1000 images in 33 hours by taking ~15/hr?
Did 'over 1000' just sound more believable?

Their math is only off by 50%; I bet they got some Spectacular CGI footage.
avatar
lizardking

Posts : 1757
Points : 4786
Reputation : 2504
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 23
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Post by lizardking on Mon Jan 11, 2016 9:23 pm

Post by Admin on May 13, 2015 at 3:11pm

Lol, that's the best fake footage they can come up with? There is NO 24 hour daylight anywhere in Antarctica. You cannot show us a real video like this and prove it to be in the Southern Hemiflat:

avatar
lizardking

Posts : 1757
Points : 4786
Reputation : 2504
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 23
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Post by lizardking on Mon Jan 11, 2016 9:23 pm

Post by Admin on Jun 17, 2015 at 4:59pm

avatar
lizardking

Posts : 1757
Points : 4786
Reputation : 2504
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 23
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Post by lizardking on Mon Jan 11, 2016 9:23 pm

Post by truth2light on Sep 14, 2015 at 1:42am

I noticed in the video of the sun in the north pole is traveling clockwise, and in the video they show us of the sun in the south is counter clockwise. So I looked into the footage a little bit and I noticed something a bit off, the footage is of the north pole but is in reverse time-lapse to make it look like its going counter clockwise in the south pole. Also saw footage that looked like the people working there were walking backwards which means it is the north pole but just reversed to make it look like their in the south pole. How pathetic of them to do that..
avatar
lizardking

Posts : 1757
Points : 4786
Reputation : 2504
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 23
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Post by vortexpuppy on Thu Jan 14, 2016 9:45 pm

Emperors in Antarctica ...
https://youtu.be/6AiCIZ9wM1o?t=48

Sun already low in the horizon, can be seen circling in the distance starting around 0:50
Never seen a sunset like that "above" the equator ....
Then 4 months of darkness....
Hang in there guys ...


vortexpuppy

Posts : 111
Points : 756
Reputation : 189
Join date : 2015-12-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Post by Admin on Fri Jan 15, 2016 5:16 am

Nice one, both the Sun and the Moon are circling very low to the horizon and moving much more horizontally and much less vertically than we're used to in less extreme latitudes (as would be expected on the flat model).
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 551
Points : 2859
Reputation : 1701
Join date : 2015-12-30

View user profile http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com

Back to top Go down

Re: No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Post by csp on Fri Jan 15, 2016 5:42 am

Wow, that is some great footage - good spot!
avatar
csp

Posts : 270
Points : 1426
Reputation : 704
Join date : 2016-01-04
Location : Australia

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Post by Odin Rising on Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:59 am

In the darkness on March 12, 1842 Captain James Clark Ross's friend, Captain Francis Crozier, operator of The Terror (Note: the other ship that was with Captain Ross, Ross operated the Erebus) smashed into a massive iceberg, IN THE DARKNESS.  How could this happen in 24 hours sunlight? http://www.timeanddate.com/sun/antarctica/south-pole?month=3&year=1842  
IT COULD NOT!   affraid

avatar
Odin Rising

Posts : 2
Points : 449
Reputation : 10
Join date : 2016-01-13
Location : South Louisiana, USA

View user profile https://www.youtube.com/c/OdinRising

Back to top Go down

Re: No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Post by AbuIsmael on Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:44 am

New HD timelapse video from Tromso showing  midnight sun reflecting on the water for several hours.

avatar
AbuIsmael

Posts : 3
Points : 431
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2016-01-24
Location : Northern Norway

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Post by Admin on Tue Feb 02, 2016 1:12 pm

avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 551
Points : 2859
Reputation : 1701
Join date : 2015-12-30

View user profile http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com

Back to top Go down

Re: No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Post by lizardking on Tue Feb 02, 2016 1:59 pm

Admin wrote:'Antarctica 24 hour sun DISPROVES the Flat Earth'

I am flabbergasted at their level of gall to actually publish footage so horrifically edited and with such little attention paid to detail, that it debunks itself. That demented piece of shit screaming that he 'DOCUMENTED IT!' is making me feel physically ill.
avatar
lizardking

Posts : 1757
Points : 4786
Reputation : 2504
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 23
Location : United Kingdom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Post by Paranoid Gramdroid on Tue Feb 09, 2016 2:35 am

Here's another faked 24 hour sun in the Antarctic video. The sun is CGI for sure. The only time we see the real sun is in the last 10 seconds. You'll see what I mean.

avatar
Paranoid Gramdroid

Posts : 10
Points : 484
Reputation : 37
Join date : 2016-01-13
Age : 39
Location : Lincolnshire, UK

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Post by Admin on Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:49 am

Haha, yes, I've seen this one before. Look at the clearly fake CGI Sun with never changing light rays shooting out of it! The real Sun's rays do not stay the exact same shape/length/width/brightness without changing even the tiniest bit like this. Pathetic, but just like NASA's CGI ball-Earth, good enough to fool 99% of the masses.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 551
Points : 2859
Reputation : 1701
Join date : 2015-12-30

View user profile http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com

Back to top Go down

Re: No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Post by Animal Sanctuary on Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:33 am

Paranoid Gramdroid wrote:Here's another faked 24 hour sun in the Antarctic video. The sun is CGI for sure. The only time we see the real sun is in the last 10 seconds. You'll see what I mean.


Yes very easy to see. Thing is, who are they doing this for? The average person is far too trusting. Very few people know how the the Antarctic is largely beyond the Sun's clutches. They hope to coral those who already suspect the truth.

It's not working though. The sun's rays are fixed for the whole clip. This makes me very mad that they lie so visibly.
avatar
Animal Sanctuary

Posts : 54
Points : 646
Reputation : 155
Join date : 2016-01-12

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Post by QuantumPineapple on Thu Feb 18, 2016 3:54 pm

There's a GIF clip going around on Facebook of the "Antarctic Winter Midnight Sun" never setting, which is in reality just a clip of the North Pole Midnight Sun.

It's getting hilarious how they are dispensing this Flat Earth disinformation to such crowds who don't question a second of it. How convenient!
avatar
QuantumPineapple

Posts : 5
Points : 447
Reputation : 25
Join date : 2016-02-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Post by Admin on Mon Jan 30, 2017 3:43 am

avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 551
Points : 2859
Reputation : 1701
Join date : 2015-12-30

View user profile http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com

Back to top Go down

Re: No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Post by csp on Mon Jan 30, 2017 4:04 am

Haha, very well done - I thought he was serious for a moment there lol!
avatar
csp

Posts : 270
Points : 1426
Reputation : 704
Join date : 2016-01-04
Location : Australia

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Post by Admin on Mon Feb 06, 2017 3:44 am

avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 551
Points : 2859
Reputation : 1701
Join date : 2015-12-30

View user profile http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com

Back to top Go down

Just aquestion

Post by Al-Zubaidi on Thu Feb 23, 2017 7:45 am

How can i dissprove the gravity theory but in the other hand we stil use it!s laws and predictions in the engeeniring studies ,statics ,dynamics ....etc
...i realy need an answer... i had seen the flat earth society answers but it makes no scence

Al-Zubaidi

Posts : 1
Points : 31
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2017-02-23

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum