ISS Hoax - The International Space Station Does Not Exist!

IS THE ISS A HOLOGRAM WORN BY A U2 SPY PLANE

Look in the background during this video. You see one of the "Astronots" gliding by in his harness setup....oops must have been edited on a Friday.

Has anyone compared the live feed from the ISS and compared the cloud coverage to say any weather maps. I bet they don't match. Would be a good test i think as more proof to the fakery.

Root wrote:Has anyone compared the live feed from the ISS and compared the cloud coverage to say any weather maps. I bet they don't match.   Would be a good test i think as more proof to the fakery.

We were doing this with their feeds when they were "live" but they stopped doing them last October. First mention of anything exposing their fakery and you were instantly banned from commenting on youtube. We've also done this with their DSCVR images to prove they are fake, that the model itself doesn't even correctly display the time of year they claim these images are being taken. It's not even difficult to prove with all the fraudulent evidence in their photos and videos.

Do you guys think they gave Scott Kelly a fake twin Mark  so he could go out in pubic while he was supposed to be in space for a year?

This is absolute evidence of ISS camera trickery somewhere in a studio -



Please skip to 4:50. At 4:54 as soon as the woman says "really shocking.." a man with a purple shirt on is seen in the reflection.

Anyone seen the latest farcical footage from the 'alleged' ISS?
It shows astro-nots creating pizzas in space, I kid you not

Amazing that with a limited amount of weight carry-able on the rocket to get to the ISS (so they claim) they can take balls, guitars, (piano) keyboards and now the dough and toppings to make pizzas

https://mobile.twitter.com/astro_paolo/status/936958158680989696/video/1

They are merely taking the piss now, it's almost as if they are testing just how much rubbish the masses will accept.

Here is an 'alleged' photo taken from the ISS on December 5th 2017 of the California wildfires.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/12/07/15/47102D9A00000578-5154893-image-m-50_1512662270585.jpg


Anyone notice anything 'strange' about this picture? Check out the size of California, it would place the USA at covering 80% of the 'globe'

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/12/06/20/470DC0B900000578-5152225-image-a-109_1512591826315.jpg


Check the lake at the bottom right corner and the top left 'Santa Maria' in this map, and compare it to the ISS photo.



Now look at an 'official' map of the USA on a 'globe'

https://www.mapsofworld.com/world-maps/maps/america-centric-world-globe-map.jpg

If you cannot see the HUGE discrepancies I fear you are beyond help

Screenshots of Nasa Live feed taken about 24 hours apart...

Look closer...

Proof of screenshot;

I compared the first ISS photo with a normal view from an airplane...

http://il8.picdn.net/shutterstock/videos/3010705/thumb/1.jpg

Not much difference to me. The ISS must have been flying at airplane altitude that day (haha!) or the camera zoomed in to California very deeply. If the ISS actually existed, then it should be the latter. But then it begs the question, how did the camera capture the foreground object so clearly or at all if it's zoomed in?

FL@T-E@RTH wrote:Here is an 'alleged' photo taken from the ISS on December 5th 2017 of the California wildfires.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/12/07/15/47102D9A00000578-5154893-image-m-50_1512662270585.jpg


Anyone notice anything 'strange' about this picture? Check out the size of California, it would place the USA at covering 80% of the 'globe'

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/12/06/20/470DC0B900000578-5152225-image-a-109_1512591826315.jpg


Check the lake at the bottom right corner and the top left 'Santa Maria' in this map, and compare it to the ISS photo.



Now look at an 'official' map of the USA on a 'globe'

https://www.mapsofworld.com/world-maps/maps/america-centric-world-globe-map.jpg

If you cannot see the HUGE discrepancies I fear you are beyond help

whoever has worked with photoshop knows what the "picking tool" is, and knows that sometimes when you pick a color to extract,like on green screen image..there is a little of this color still on the boarders of the selection area cause the green pixels are mixing with the colors of the boarder..so sometimes you can still see some green left on the boarders.As it happened to this guy that photoshopped (badly)these ISS pictures..https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3e/ISS-27_Dmitri_Kondratyev_and_Paolo_Nespoli_photograph_the_Earth_through_the_Cupola.jpg

Here we can see Karen Nyberg,on a zero gravity plane washing her hair and of course not caring at all about the water spreading anywhere.In this kind of videos you can hear the engines of the plane.
But here there is something more interesting..a very cheap nasa trick: parabolic flights cannot last more than 30 seconds,so you can see how they make this "flash effect" since the begining of the video to make your eye get used to the cool effect.In the begining of the video the flashes are used in the same cut..but later you dont know how much time has passed..watch it with attention to understand the trick and the illusion.You cant count a take more than 30 seconds,is always interrupted by a cut

macgyver wrote:
zero gravity plane
cheap nasa trick
parabolic flights
30 seconds

There is No Gravity - The Zero G Plane provides a protected environment for Free-Fall; unlike Sky-Divers who must fall through differing air resistance based on speed and conditions. For the Sky-Diver, without the protected cabin, air resistance increases with velocity until equilibrium is reached and acceleration stops; this is called terminal velocity.

[G]ravity replaced Abracadabra
Theoretical Physicist is another term for Science Fiction Writer