The 10,000 Dollar Baller Challenge

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

Go down

Re: The 10,000 Dollar Baller Challenge

Post by jewry/trannywood on Sun Sep 09, 2018 4:29 pm

Your'e not going to convince a religious ball earth fanatic of anything guys.
Despite pointing out the facts of perspective and limitation of vision, regardless of using telescopes or not, this balling disciple continues to spew the same drivel over and over.
If he was really concerned with truth, he would watch some of Gav's videos on perspective which are conclusive and full off observable proof rather than Jewkipedia. In fact anyone listing this as a source should not even be entertained, except to be laughed at like a court jester. '
These ballers would look at the colour black and tell you it is 100% white just because their high priests told them so.


jewry/trannywood

Posts : 16
Points : 57
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2018-08-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The 10,000 Dollar Baller Challenge

Post by Dual1ty on Sun Sep 09, 2018 9:40 pm

No worries. I'm sure a group of super-smart, honest and independent globe scientists are working really hard on this challenge at the moment—compiling a whole bunch of factual, irrefutable evidence for a magical spinning pear-shaped ball Earth—and will kindly present it to us (and the world) and collect their $10k any minute now...







avatar
Dual1ty

Posts : 6
Points : 26
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2018-09-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The 10,000 Dollar Baller Challenge

Post by Frenetic Zetetic on Mon Sep 10, 2018 10:20 am

jewry/trannywood wrote:Your'e not going to convince a religious ball earth fanatic of anything guys.
Despite pointing out the facts of perspective and limitation of vision, regardless of using telescopes or not, this balling disciple continues to spew the same drivel over and over.
If he was really concerned with truth, he would watch some of Gav's videos on perspective which are conclusive and full off observable proof rather than Jewkipedia. In fact anyone listing this as a source should not even be entertained, except to be laughed at like a court jester. '
These ballers would look at the colour black and tell you it is 100% white just because their high priests told them so.


Exactly. When you're brainwashed to believe that there is no up or down and everything is relative, the rules go right out the window. The ISS window...which is always open...despite being "in space"... Laughing
avatar
Frenetic Zetetic

Posts : 11
Points : 52
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2018-08-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The 10,000 Dollar Baller Challenge

Post by Admin on Wed Sep 12, 2018 12:57 pm

More proof the Lake Pontchartrain power lines curve due to perspective not globularity:

avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 1201
Points : 5393
Reputation : 3012
Join date : 2015-12-30

View user profile http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The 10,000 Dollar Baller Challenge

Post by jimsmithinchiapas on Thu Sep 20, 2018 4:27 pm

The following are only a few of the reasons why no one but the most deluded or dimwitted would consider this "Challenge" legitimate: (1) Eric Dubay is so determinedly biased that he doesn't even acknowledge the existence of Sigma Octantis; (2) The judges stand to lose money if they admit that they have been wrong about the Globe Earth; and (3) although the judges claim to have conducted a years-long search to satisfy their burning personal desire for evidence against the Flat Earth, they have crafted the terms of the Challenge so as to disallow, out of hand, the types of experiments that would be most likely to produce such evidence. For example, MigFlug "Edge of Space" flights to 17 km. (Note that to eliminate the possibility that optical distortions in the MiG's canopy cause the horizon to appear curved, the judges could perform their own tests before and after the flights.)

If MigFlug's advertising is accurate, that flight would satisfy the judges' burning personal desire for evidence against the Flat Earth. Perhaps that's why they crafted the Terms to require that submitted experiments be accessible to "everyone":

"The experiment needs to be something testable and demonstrable by everyone, so requiring people to travel to the North/South Pole or into "outer-space" to prove your point is not acceptable ... " (Admin on Mon Sep 03, 2018 8:08 pm).

So much for the judges' "desperate" desire to know the truth. Eric wouldn't have attempted this laughably, transparently bogus publicity stunt unless he thought that Flat Earthers are very dim bulbs. And to this point, events have proved him right.

jimsmithinchiapas

Posts : 3
Points : 5
Reputation : -5
Join date : 2018-09-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The 10,000 Dollar Baller Challenge

Post by Schpankme on Thu Sep 20, 2018 5:55 pm

jimsmithinchiapas wrote:
no one but the most deluded or dimwitted
acknowledge the existence of Sigma Octantis


The south celestial pole (SCP), "the imaginary point in the sky directly above the Earth’s south pole", can be located by using the constellation Crux and the two brightest stars in Centaurus, Rigil Kent and Hadar.  These stars are sometimes called the “Southern Pointers”.  Extend an imaginary line through the long axis of the cross, from the star at the top (Gacrux) through the star at the bottom (Acrux).  

...The SCP lies just south of the halfway point between these two bright stars.

Here's a better way to find the Fake south celestial pole star:  Look for the "second star to the right, and fly straight on till morning"

ref: oneminuteastronomer.com/3307/finding-south-celestial-pole/
avatar
Schpankme

Posts : 754
Points : 3149
Reputation : 1377
Join date : 2015-12-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The 10,000 Dollar Baller Challenge

Post by jimsmithinchiapas on Thu Sep 20, 2018 11:26 pm

You misquoted me. I did not say "no one but the most deluded or dimwitted acknowledge the existence of Sigma Octantis". Or do you not know how to use an ellipsis when you omit words from a passage that you're quoting?

Also, my post did not refer to the South Celestial Pole. Instead, I referred exclusively to the star Sigma Octantis, whose existence is incontrovertible. Eric's refusal to to acknowledge it disqualifies him as a judge of scientific evidence. But as I said in my OP,

"Eric wouldn't have attempted this laughably, transparently bogus publicity stunt unless he thought that Flat Earthers are very dim bulbs. And to this point, events have proved him right."

jimsmithinchiapas

Posts : 3
Points : 5
Reputation : -5
Join date : 2018-09-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The 10,000 Dollar Baller Challenge

Post by Schpankme on Thu Sep 20, 2018 11:46 pm

jimsmithinchiapas wrote:
"no one but the most deluded or dimwitted acknowledge the existence of Sigma Octantis"

The so called constellation Octans, is said to be one of the handful of constellations invented the French astronomer "Nicolas Louis de Lacaille", in 1754.  The so called southern polestar, Polaris Australis (also called Sigma Octantis), unlike the north polestar, Polaris, CAN NOT be seen by the naked eye.  bahaha

So, your balltardism has you using FAITH to beLIEve about the Southern Pole Star that you can't see and can't use for navigation.  Why did Lacaille use the Latin word octan?  Because he wanted to represent the fake Southeren Pole Star "as a navigational instrument that was replaced by the sextant in the latter half of the 18th century."  bahaha


Here's a better way to find the Fake southern pole star:  Look for the "second star to the right, and fly straight on till morning"
avatar
Schpankme

Posts : 754
Points : 3149
Reputation : 1377
Join date : 2015-12-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The 10,000 Dollar Baller Challenge

Post by jimsmithinchiapas on Fri Sep 21, 2018 12:49 am

" jimsmithinchiapas wrote: 'no one but the most deluded or dimwitted acknowledge the existence of Sigma Octantis' "

Thank you for demonstrating that your misrepresentation of my OP was deliberate.

The so called southern polestar, Polaris Australis (also called Sigma Octantis), unlike the north polestar, Polaris, CAN NOT be seen by the naked eye.  bahaha

I'll trust people who live in or travel to places in the Southern Hemisphere with clear, dark skies to test that assertion themselves, and form their own opinion about your credibility.

Also, you're misrepresenting or evading my point: that Eric denies the very existence of Sigma Octantis. Do you and he believe that a star exists only if it is naked-eye visible? If so, there's a marvelous new invention called binoculars that might interest you.

But a more-likely explanation is that you're being merely dishonest -- again.

jimsmithinchiapas

Posts : 3
Points : 5
Reputation : -5
Join date : 2018-09-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The 10,000 Dollar Baller Challenge

Post by Schpankme on Fri Sep 21, 2018 1:25 am

jimsmithinchiapas wrote:
Polaris Australis (Sigma Octantis)

I'll trust people who live in or travel to places in the Southern Hemisphere

Again you show to be "deluded or dimwitted" without first-hand knowledge.


jimsmithinchiapas wrote:
Eric denies the very existence of Sigma Octantis

Only Heliocentric Priests and the "deluded or dimwitted" except that "Sigma Octantis" is representing the so called Southern Pole Star on Spaceball Earth.

Why did French astronomer "Nicolas Louis de Lacaille", in 1754, use the Latin word "octan" to describe the fake Southern Pole Star?  
Because he wanted to claim it "as a navigational instrument that was replaced by the sextant in the latter half of the 18th century."  bahaha


"Sigma Octantis is so dim that trying to use this as a guide point is relatively pointless." ~ astronomywa.net.au/


"no one but the most deluded or dimwitted acknowledge the existence of Sigma Octantis"
avatar
Schpankme

Posts : 754
Points : 3149
Reputation : 1377
Join date : 2015-12-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The 10,000 Dollar Baller Challenge

Post by Dual1ty on Fri Sep 21, 2018 2:19 am

It's so dim because it's 88 quadrillion light years away in the LOL 666 galaxy and most of its light gets sent to a parallel dimension before it reaches the Earth due to the curvature of space-time. What a Face

You're just a dimwit for not knowing that, Schpankme!


Last edited by Dual1ty on Fri Sep 21, 2018 1:11 pm; edited 1 time in total
avatar
Dual1ty

Posts : 6
Points : 26
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2018-09-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The 10,000 Dollar Baller Challenge

Post by Schpankme on Fri Sep 21, 2018 3:34 am

Dual1ty wrote:
It's so dim because
its light gets sent to a parallel dimension before it reaches the Earth
due to the curvature of space-time

I love reading your Science Fiction Stories before bed time; but, it gets even worse for the worshipers of Heliocentricism.   Arrow

Why is it that Heliocentric Priests never ask, "how come the Vatican owns and operates the majority of Telescope Observatories?"

Lets begin with the fact that society is controlled through 'psychological manipulation' whose reality is defined by what they perceive to be fact and fiction.  It all started around the year 1500 when the advent of the "printing press" became available to those with influence and power.

In 1542 the papal Inquisition was re-established to combat Protestantism, eventually becoming an organ of papal government.  Except within the Papal States, the institution of the Inquisition was abolished in the early 19th century, after the Napoleonic Wars in Europe and after the Spanish American wars of independence in the Americas. The institution survived as part of the Roman Curia, but in 1908 was given the new name of "Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office". In 1965 it became the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

Nicolaus Copernicus (1473–1543)
It is said that Copernicus conducted astronomical observations, using primitive instruments modeled on ancient ones -- the quadrant, triquetrum, armillary sphere.  Around 1514, Copernicus wrote an initial outline describing his theory of the heliocentric mechanism, without mathematical apparatus, which differed in some important details of geometric construction from his work, De revolutionibus orbium coelestium (On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres).  This book was first printed in 1543 in Nuremberg, Holy Roman Empire, it offered an alternative model of the universe to Ptolemy's geocentric system, which had been widely accepted since ancient times.

History Time-Line:

1543
May 24, Copernicus dies.

1572 - almost 30 years later
Jesuit Christopher Clavius recommends reforming the calendar based on Copernican Heliocentricism.

1582 - 10 years would pass before the Holy Roman Empire agreed
Heliocentricism as invented by Copernicus is used by Pope Gregory XIII to reform the calendar.
  Institutes Gregorian calendar in March, 1582.

So, the question becomes:  has anyone seen a Spaceball orbiting another Spaceball?   NO, but we now have the Theory of Heliocentricism being taught by the most powerful and feared organization on the face of the Earth, the Holy Roman Empire (aka Vatican).

1601
Telescope invented

see:  Who invented the Space Enterprise

1610
Galileo Galilei, claims to see Spaceballs orbiting about one another (planetary motion).
  Galileo is a beneficiary of the Jesuit payroll.

1611
Jesuit Christopher Clavius, confirms Galileo’s observations of planetary motion.
  Jesuits claim that Lights they observe through their Telescopes are in fact Spaceballs that orbit about one another.

1931
Jesuits invent Big Bang theory (aka, Cosmic Egg or Primeval atom)


From birth you are indoctrinated to worship the man-made constructs of Heaven and Space (Fiction).

avatar
Schpankme

Posts : 754
Points : 3149
Reputation : 1377
Join date : 2015-12-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The 10,000 Dollar Baller Challenge

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum