No Curvature On Bodies Of Water

Has anyone debunked this? Forgive me if I've missed it on here.

Amitchelld wrote:
Has anyone debunked this?
Forgive me if I've missed it on here

Amitchelld, did you come here to ask all your balltard questions?

I want you to answer your own question;
HOW is it possible for the curvature shown to be so great across the short lake called "Pontchartrain"?
WHAT should the curvature be on Spaceball Earth for the distance shown (average) at Lake Pontchartrain?

Didn't come for my questions, this specific one was a question of someone I was talking about the shape of the Earth with and they brought this lake up as evidence of the globe Earth, and I didn't know anything about it so I came on here, sorry. That's how you would answer someone trying to give you a piece of evidence supporting their globe idea, just ask them to think for themselves?

Amitchelld wrote:
Didn't come for my questions
I was talking about the shape of the Earth with and they brought this lake up as evidence of the globe Earth

You came here to ask this forum if Lake Pontchartrain has a curve in it?

Are you incapable of knowing how "balltard curvature math" works to debunk the bullshit you drag in here?

Do us all a favor a stop talking to balltads and spend more time reading this forum.


Here we have you back in the Topic: North Pole - South Pole Circumnavigation 2014. Or not?
asking - "British Trans-globe expedition?"

That pic that's supposedly of Lake Pontchartrain is absurd. In fact its such a "bad" photo it's laughable. Was it photoshopped? Because if you look carefully you'll see that the pylons actually don't get any shorter or narrower the further you look into the distance. It's as though they start to "float" above the water. Also, while there is a noticeable shadow to the right of the pylon there are no shadows on the water. It's fake.